The Confidence Code

The Confidence Code Plot Summary

Introduction

Confidence is the quality that sets apart those who achieve their potential from those who remain stuck at the starting blocks of possibility. It's a characteristic that is easily recognized yet difficult to define, and it appears to be in critically short supply among women. Despite remarkable gains in education and workplace representation, women continue to doubt themselves, underestimate their abilities, and hesitate to take risks or claim credit for their achievements. This confidence gap exists even among the most accomplished women in leadership positions across business, politics, sports, and academia. The gap between competence and confidence represents perhaps the most significant obstacle to women's full participation and advancement in professional life. The evidence is compelling: women apply for promotions only when they meet 100% of the qualifications, while men apply when they meet just 60%; women consistently rate their performance lower than men rate theirs, even when objective measures show no difference; and women speak 75% less when they're outnumbered in meetings. Yet research increasingly shows that confidence—not just competence—is what propels professional success. By understanding the biological, psychological, and social roots of the confidence gap, and by adopting practical strategies to overcome self-limiting patterns, women can develop the mindset essential for reaching their full potential in every sphere.

Chapter 1: The Definition of Confidence: Beyond Feeling Good to Taking Action

Confidence is widely misunderstood. Many people associate it with feeling good about oneself or projecting an appearance of self-assurance through dominant behaviors like speaking loudly or taking up physical space. But true confidence is fundamentally about action, not feelings or appearances. In its most basic form, confidence is the bridge that converts thoughts into deeds—it's what enables us to act despite uncertainty and imperfection. Neuroscientist Adam Kepecs offers valuable insight through his studies of confidence in rats. His research reveals that confidence has a "dual nature" with both objective and subjective components. The objective aspect involves a calculation about the likelihood of success, while the subjective element is the feeling that accompanies that calculation. When rats in Kepecs' experiments are confident in their choices, they will wait patiently for their reward. This demonstrates that confidence is not merely a human psychological quirk but a fundamental decision-making mechanism found across species. Ohio State University psychologist Richard Petty provides perhaps the most elegant definition: "Confidence is the stuff that turns thoughts into action." This simple formulation captures the essence of confidence as an activating force. When we are confident, we move from contemplation to implementation, from planning to performance, from intention to initiative. Without confidence, our thoughts remain just that—thoughts, trapped in our minds, never manifesting in the world. The distinction between confidence and related qualities further clarifies its unique nature. Self-esteem is a general feeling of self-worth, while confidence is domain-specific and tied to action. Optimism is a positive expectation about outcomes, but doesn't necessarily spur action as confidence does. Self-efficacy—the belief in one's ability to accomplish specific tasks—is closely related to confidence but focuses more narrowly on capability rather than activation. What makes confidence distinctive is its function as a catalyst that propels us to take risks, try new things, voice our opinions, and persevere through difficulties. For women, developing confidence requires acknowledging that perfection is not a prerequisite for action. The research consistently shows that slightly overconfident people—those who believe they can do somewhat more than their actual abilities might warrant—tend to accomplish more than those with perfectly calibrated self-assessments. This slight overconfidence creates a virtuous cycle: it leads to action, which leads to mastery, which builds genuine confidence, which encourages more action. The key insight is that confidence requires taking the leap before feeling fully ready—it's about doing, not just feeling.

Chapter 2: The Confidence Gap: Why Women Have Less and Why It Matters

The confidence gap between men and women is not merely anecdotal but measurable and significant. Research consistently documents this disparity across cultures, age groups, and professional fields. A study by the Institute of Leadership and Management found that half of female managers reported self-doubt about their job performance, compared to less than a third of male managers. At Carnegie Mellon University, economist Linda Babcock discovered that men initiate salary negotiations four times as often as women, and when women do negotiate, they ask for 30% less. Perhaps most tellingly, when surveyed about what they expect to earn five years after graduation, female business students consistently cite figures about 20% lower than what male students believe they deserve. This gap in self-perception translates into concrete disadvantages. The hesitation to speak up in meetings means women's ideas go unheard. The reluctance to apply for positions unless perfectly qualified keeps women from opportunities for which they are actually well-prepared. The tendency to attribute success to luck or others' help, rather than to their own capabilities, prevents women from building on their achievements. And perhaps most critically, confidence researcher Cameron Anderson has demonstrated that confidence is actually more strongly correlated with professional success than competence is. When people appear confident, others assume they are competent and give them more opportunities, resources, and influence. Crucially, women's lower confidence is not due to lower ability. In a revealing experiment, psychologist Zach Estes gave men and women a spatial rotation test. Initially, women performed worse than men—not because they got more answers wrong, but because they left more questions blank. When instructed to answer every question, women's scores rose to equal men's. The women had the same abilities but less confidence in those abilities, which prevented them from even attempting to solve problems they could have answered correctly. The consequences of this gap extend beyond individual women to affect entire organizations and societies. When talented women hold themselves back from leadership positions, everyone loses the benefit of their skills, perspectives, and potential contributions. Studies consistently show that companies with more women in leadership positions outperform their competitors on multiple measures of organizational health and financial performance. Yet women remain significantly underrepresented in top positions across most fields, with the confidence gap playing a crucial role in this persistent disparity. Understanding the confidence gap matters because addressing it requires recognizing that it exists not because women are inherently less capable but because multiple factors—biological, psychological, cultural, and structural—converge to undermine women's belief in their abilities to act and lead. Acknowledging these complex origins is the first step toward developing effective strategies for closing the gap and enabling women to fulfill their potential.

Chapter 3: Nature vs. Nurture: The Biology and Social Roots of Confidence

The origins of confidence lie in a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental influence. Research suggests that approximately 25-50% of our confidence baseline may be inherited through our genetic makeup. Neuropsychologist Steve Suomi's groundbreaking work with rhesus monkeys demonstrates that certain gene variations, particularly those affecting serotonin regulation, significantly impact confidence-related behaviors like risk-taking and resilience to stress. Similarly, behavioral geneticist Robert Plomin's twin studies indicate that genetic factors substantially influence self-perceived abilities, which form a crucial component of confidence. Several specific genes appear particularly influential. The serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) affects how efficiently our bodies process serotonin, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate mood and anxiety. Those with the "long" variant typically show greater emotional resilience and lower anxiety levels—key foundations for confidence. The COMT gene, often called the "warrior/worrier" gene, regulates dopamine levels in the brain. Its "warrior" variant helps people perform well under pressure, while the "worrier" variant can lead to overthinking and performance anxiety. The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) influences social behaviors and optimism, with certain variants associated with greater social confidence. However, biology is not destiny. The emerging field of epigenetics demonstrates that life experiences can actually modify how our genes express themselves. This means that while we may inherit certain predispositions toward higher or lower confidence, our experiences can override these tendencies. Particularly fascinating is the "orchid gene" hypothesis, which suggests that so-called "sensitivity genes" (including some variants of the serotonin transporter gene) make people more responsive to both negative and positive environments. Individuals with these genes might be more vulnerable to developing low confidence in harsh environments but may actually develop exceptionally high confidence in nurturing ones. Social and cultural factors play an equally significant role in shaping confidence. From early childhood, girls receive subtle but powerful messages that being "good" (quiet, compliant, perfect) is more important than being bold or taking risks. Research shows that parents and teachers tend to praise girls for their neatness, caution, and rule-following, while boys are more often encouraged to be adventurous and assertive. By elementary school, girls already express more doubt about their abilities than boys do, despite earning better grades. This socialization continues into adulthood, where women face what social scientists call a "double bind"—they are expected to be confident and competent but also warm and likable. When women display the assertive behaviors associated with confidence in men, they often face social penalties. Studies show that the same behaviors labeled as "confident" or "strategic" in men are frequently described as "aggressive" or "political" when exhibited by women. This creates a no-win situation where displaying confidence may actually undermine a woman's professional standing. Brain structure and hormonal differences further complicate the picture. Research indicates that female brains typically show greater activity in regions associated with worry and rumination, and women produce less serotonin than men, potentially making them more susceptible to anxiety and overthinking. The influence of hormones like estrogen and testosterone on risk-taking and competitive behavior adds another layer of complexity to the confidence equation. Understanding these intertwined biological and social influences reveals why the confidence gap persists despite women's clear competence. More importantly, it points to potential solutions that address both aspects of the confidence challenge.

Chapter 4: Building Confidence: Practical Strategies for Breaking Self-Limiting Patterns

Developing confidence requires concrete actions and deliberate mental shifts. The most fundamental principle for building confidence is counterintuitive yet consistently supported by research: action precedes feeling. Rather than waiting to feel confident before taking risks, women must take risks in order to develop confidence. This means embracing a "fail fast" approach—trying things, making mistakes, learning, and moving forward quickly rather than seeking perfection before acting. Rewiring thought patterns is essential for overcoming the negative mental habits that undermine confidence. Women tend to ruminate more than men, dwelling on perceived failures and mentally rehearsing worst-case scenarios. This rumination activates the brain's fear center (the amygdala) and inhibits the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for rational decision-making. To interrupt this pattern, women can practice cognitive reframing—consciously challenging negative thoughts and generating alternative explanations for events. For example, reframing "I made a mistake in that presentation, I'm terrible at public speaking" to "That slide didn't work well, but the rest of my presentation was clear and I'll improve next time." Another powerful mental shift involves redirecting focus from self-evaluation to task accomplishment. Psychologist Jenny Crocker's research shows that when women stop thinking about how they're being perceived and instead concentrate on what they want to accomplish, their confidence naturally increases. This can be as simple as reframing a presentation from "an opportunity to prove my expertise" to "a chance to share information that will help my team succeed." This shift from a self-focused to a purpose-focused mindset reduces anxiety and enhances performance. Mastery experiences—successfully accomplishing challenging tasks—are perhaps the most potent confidence builders. Washington Mystics basketball player Crystal Langhorne transformed herself from a bench player to an all-star through relentless practice. "When you work on things you think: 'I know I can do this. I worked on it. I did it in practice,'" she explains. Starting with small challenges and gradually tackling larger ones creates a foundation of proven capability that builds lasting confidence. Physical practices also play a surprising role in confidence development. Research by Harvard psychologist Amy Cuddy demonstrates that adopting "power poses"—expansive body positions that take up space—for just two minutes can increase testosterone, decrease cortisol, and boost confidence before challenging situations. Similarly, regular meditation has been shown to physically shrink the brain's fear center while strengthening the prefrontal cortex, creating a brain structure more conducive to confidence. Language patterns significantly impact confidence. Women often undermine their own authority through "upspeak" (ending statements with a questioning tone), excessive apologizing, and self-deprecating qualifiers ("I'm not an expert, but..."). Consciously monitoring and modifying these speech habits—speaking definitively, eliminating unnecessary apologies, and acknowledging accomplishments directly—helps both project and internalize greater confidence. Perhaps most challenging but crucial is learning to tolerate and even welcome failure. Attorney and former presidential campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle recalls being devastated after being fired from Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign. Yet she now views that experience as transformative: "I've learned how to deal with negative stories; I've learned that we can lose and move on." This capacity to view setbacks as learning opportunities rather than character indictments is essential for building resilience and confidence.

Chapter 5: Authentic Confidence: Finding Your Own Path Beyond Male Models

Authentic confidence for women doesn't require adopting traditionally masculine behaviors or suppressing feminine qualities. The prevailing cultural model of confidence—characterized by dominance, unshakable certainty, and aggressive self-promotion—is just one expression of confidence, not its essence. Women can develop equally effective but more authentic versions of confidence that draw on their strengths and align with their values. Research from Stanford Business School reveals that women who combine traditionally masculine qualities (assertiveness, decisiveness) with feminine strengths (collaboration, relationship-building) are actually promoted 1.5 times more frequently than men displaying purely masculine traits. This suggests that the most effective approach for women isn't mimicking male confidence but developing an integrated style that honors both assertiveness and connection. IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde embodies this integrated approach. She acknowledges experiencing nervousness before critical meetings but doesn't let that stop her from asserting her expertise. She values thorough preparation (studying issues "inside, outside, sideways, backwards, historically, genetically and geographically") while recognizing this as both a strength and a potential limitation. Most importantly, she believes women shouldn't "try to imitate the boys in everything they do" but rather should be "ourselves with strength and worthiness." Authenticity itself contributes to confidence. When women try to adopt confidence behaviors that feel unnatural or forced, they often experience what psychologists call "imposter syndrome"—the sense of fraudulence that undermines genuine confidence. By contrast, identifying and leveraging personal strengths creates a foundation for confidence that feels genuine and sustainable. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand emphasizes this point: "You don't want to turn women into men. You want to make women celebrate their own strong points." For many women, confidence manifests not as never experiencing doubt but as acting despite doubt. Beth Wilkinson, a top litigator who helped prosecute Timothy McVeigh, describes confidence as the ability to make decisions quickly and take responsibility for them, even knowing some decisions will be wrong. This view of confidence accommodates the self-reflection and consideration that many women value without allowing those qualities to paralyze action. Redefining confidence also means recognizing that it can be expressed through listening and collaboration as well as through speaking and individual achievement. Female confidence often includes building consensus, incorporating diverse perspectives, and sharing credit—approaches that research increasingly shows lead to better organizational outcomes. A Stanford study found that female members of Congress actually pass more legislation than their male counterparts and work more effectively across party lines, suggesting that a collaborative approach to leadership can be highly effective. Developing authentic confidence requires self-awareness about personal strengths, values, and natural leadership style. The Values in Action (VIA) Institute's research on character strengths offers a useful framework, helping women identify qualities like social intelligence, perspective, or creativity that they can leverage in developing their unique confidence profile. Rather than trying to eliminate every trace of self-doubt or uncertainty, authentic confidence means acknowledging these feelings while preventing them from determining action. Christine Lagarde captures this approach in her advice to a female president who reduced her motorcade from twenty-five cars to five despite criticism that she was undermining the presidency: "Dare the difference. Make it your selling point. Don't try to measure yourself, your performance, your popularity, against the standards and the yardsticks and the measurements that men have used before you." This perspective reframes confidence not as conformity to masculine norms but as the courage to chart a distinctive path aligned with one's values and vision.

Chapter 6: Failing Fast and Moving Forward: The Unexpected Path to Confidence

Contrary to common perception, failure is not the opposite of confidence but often its prerequisite. The "fail fast" approach—experimenting quickly, making mistakes, learning, and adjusting—builds confidence more effectively than cautious perfectionism. This counterintuitive insight is transforming how psychologists and business leaders understand confidence development, especially for women who tend to avoid situations where they might fail. The tech industry has embraced this principle through the concept of "minimum viable products"—launching imperfect prototypes to gather real-world feedback rather than perfecting products in isolation. For women building confidence, this translates to taking action before feeling fully prepared, recognizing that waiting for perfect readiness means never starting at all. As one female entrepreneur put it: "If I had waited until I felt ready to launch my business, I'd still be waiting." Psychological research supports this approach. Carol Dweck's studies on "growth mindset" demonstrate that viewing abilities as developable through effort, rather than fixed traits, dramatically increases resilience after setbacks. People with growth mindsets interpret failures as learning opportunities rather than confirmations of inadequacy. This perspective is particularly valuable for women, who tend to view their abilities as more fixed than men do, especially in domains stereotypically considered masculine. The neural mechanisms underlying this process are fascinating. Each time we face a fear or survive a failure, our brains literally rewire themselves. The amygdala (fear center) becomes less reactive, while connections to the prefrontal cortex (rational decision-making area) strengthen. This neuroplasticity means that deliberately practicing failure resilience physically transforms our brains to support greater confidence. As neuroscientist Laura-Ann Petitto explains, "You can build bridges over the highway. You might not get rid of the highway, because it was put down so early, but you can work around it, and literally lay down new roads." Women face particular psychological obstacles to embracing failure. Research shows they tend to attribute failures to internal causes ("I lack ability") while attributing successes to external factors ("I got lucky"), the opposite pattern of men. This attribution style makes failures feel more devastating and permanent. Developing healthier responses to failure requires consciously practicing external attribution for setbacks ("This was a difficult situation") and internal attribution for successes ("My preparation paid off"). Self-compassion—treating oneself with the same kindness one would offer a friend—provides crucial emotional support during this process. Psychologist Kristin Neff's research shows that self-compassion predicts emotional resilience better than self-esteem does. Unlike self-esteem, which depends on success, self-compassion remains available during failures, providing a psychological safety net that makes risk-taking less threatening. This compassionate stance doesn't diminish motivation but actually enhances it by reducing the paralysis of self-criticism. Small, strategic risks create momentum toward larger confidence-building challenges. For women reluctant to speak in meetings, this might mean committing to making one comment in every meeting for a month. For those hesitant about negotiation, it could involve practicing salary discussions with friends before attempting them with employers. Each small success builds evidence of capability that contradicts self-doubt. The cumulative effect of this approach is what psychologists call a "virtuous cycle" of confidence development. Taking action despite fear leads to increased mastery, which produces greater confidence, which enables more ambitious action. Attorney Beth Wilkinson describes this cycle: "Now there's no way I would have said that right after I lost my job, not at all. But I've learned that what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. I've learned so much about how to deal with negative stories; I've learned that we can lose and move on." This perspective transforms failure from something to be avoided at all costs to a necessary ingredient in developing authentic, resilient confidence—the kind that withstands inevitable setbacks and propels continuous growth.

Chapter 7: Raising Confident Girls: Breaking the Cycle of Self-Doubt

Confidence development begins in childhood, and parents, educators, and mentors play crucial roles in either nurturing or undermining girls' belief in their capabilities. Understanding the patterns that contribute to the confidence gap allows us to intervene early and raise a generation of girls who approach challenges with greater self-assurance and resilience. Traditional parenting approaches often unintentionally reinforce girls' tendency toward perfectionism and caution. Well-meaning parents frequently praise girls for being "good," following rules, and achieving high grades, while boys receive more encouragement for taking risks and showing independence. This differential treatment teaches girls that approval comes from meeting expectations rather than from stretching boundaries or recovering from mistakes. As psychologist Carol Dweck notes, "If life were one long grade school, women would be the undisputed rulers of the world"—but professional success requires comfort with risk and failure that school-based achievement doesn't necessarily develop. Research from Japanese education provides insight into more effective approaches. Japanese teachers intentionally assign students tasks slightly beyond their current abilities, allowing them to struggle before providing guidance. When students succeed, teachers help them recognize how their effort and persistence—not innate ability—enabled their achievement. This creates what psychologists call a "growth mindset," the belief that abilities develop through effort rather than being fixed traits. Girls with growth mindsets show significantly higher confidence and achievement, particularly in domains stereotypically considered masculine. Physical activity and competitive sports provide particularly valuable confidence-building experiences for girls. Studies evaluating the impact of Title IX legislation found that girls who play team sports are more likely to graduate from college, find employment in male-dominated industries, and earn higher salaries. Sports teach girls to own both victory and defeat, to push physical limits, to collaborate toward goals, and to recover quickly from setbacks. Karen Kelser, who runs a girls' soccer program, explains: "It mirrors life as not much else does. There aren't many other opportunities for girls to work as a team, to win, to lose, and to learn to get over failure." Cultural messages about appearance and perfection pose significant challenges to girls' confidence development. By age ten, 81% of girls report fear of being fat, and by adolescence, girls experience a much steeper drop in self-esteem than boys do. Parents can counter these influences by encouraging daughters to value strength and capability over appearance, by exposing them to diverse female role models, and by monitoring their own language about bodies and abilities. Simple shifts—like praising effort rather than natural talent, or discussing a female athlete's accomplishments rather than her appearance—can significantly impact how girls view themselves and their potential. Perhaps most counterintuitively, research suggests that encouraging girls to be "a little bit bad" may actually boost their confidence. Michelle Rhee, former chancellor of Washington DC public schools, credits her willingness to challenge authority to her mother's acceptance of her independent spirit: "I don't give a crap if people like me or not, and apparently I never have." This independence from others' approval provided crucial psychological freedom to make difficult and unpopular decisions throughout her career. While parents naturally appreciate compliant, helpful children, allowing girls to express disagreement, set boundaries, and occasionally break rules builds the psychological muscle needed for adult assertiveness. Exposing girls to fields where women are underrepresented is also essential. Less than 5% of girls expect to work in engineering or computer science, not because they lack ability but because they lack confidence in these domains. Parents can counter this by connecting science and math to social impact (which research shows increases girls' interest), by avoiding self-deprecating comments about their own abilities ("I'm terrible at math"), and by providing exposure to female role models in these fields. Even brief exposure to competent female professionals can dramatically expand girls' sense of possibility, as witnessed when a young basketball player observed professional female athletes and immediately began evaluating her own potential in a new light. By understanding the unique challenges girls face in developing confidence, parents and educators can create environments that nurture rather than undermine this essential quality, raising daughters who approach life's challenges with the belief that they can succeed.

Summary

The confidence code reveals itself as an actionable formula rather than an elusive mystery. At its core, confidence functions as the critical bridge between thought and action—it is quite literally the element that enables us to move from contemplation to implementation. The evidence overwhelmingly shows that the confidence gap between men and women stems not from inherent capability differences but from a complex interplay of biological predispositions, neural mechanisms, and pervasive social conditioning that begins in childhood. While some aspects of confidence may be genetically influenced, the research on neuroplasticity and epigenetics demonstrates that our brains and even our genetic expression can be transformed through deliberate practice and environmental changes. The most transformative insight emerges in the realization that authentic confidence doesn't require women to adopt traditionally masculine behaviors or suppress their natural tendencies toward collaboration, preparation, or thoughtful analysis. Instead, it demands embracing a paradoxical truth: confidence develops through action before certainty, through risking failure rather than avoiding it, and through practicing self-compassion instead of self-criticism. By understanding that confidence is fundamentally a choice to act despite doubt, women can break the cycle of overthinking and perfectionism that inhibits their potential. This understanding enables a profound shift from viewing confidence as something we either have or lack to seeing it as a capability we can systematically develop through specific practices—failing fast, mastering skills through deliberate practice, rewiring thought patterns, and creating environments that nurture rather than undermine belief in our capabilities. When women embrace this perspective, they not only transform their own professional trajectories but also create new possibilities for future generations.

About Author

Loading...

Katty Kay

Katherine "Katty" Kay (born c. 1964) is an English journalist. She is the lead anchor of BBC World News America and was previously the BBC News Washington correspondent from 2002. Until 2009 she also blogged at the website True/Slant and is a Board Member at the IWMF (International Women's Media Foundation).Kay grew up in various Middle East countries, where her father was posted as a British diplomat. She studied modern languages at the University of Oxford and, as a result, speaks fluent French and Italian. After graduation, she briefly worked for the Bank of England. Deciding a career in economics was not for her, she left to work for an aid agency in Zimbabwe.A short time later, friend Matt Frei came out with a tape recorder and persuaded her to become a journalist. Kay joined the BBC in 1990 as Zimbabwe correspondent for the African section of the BBC World Service. She then returned to London to work for BBC World Service radio, before being posted to Tokyo for BBC News television in 1992 and then Washington, D.C., in 1996. Soon afterwards, she joined The Times news bureau, but returned to the BBC as a freelance journalist in 2002, based in the United States.From June 2004, Kay co-presented the BBC World news bulletins with Mike Embley in London, shown on 230 public broadcast-television stations throughout the US and on BBC America. From 1 October 2007, Kay became correspondent to presenter Matt Frei of BBC World's one-hour Washington-based news broadcast, BBC World News America, it airs on the BBC News Channel, BBC America, and BBC World. Kay also makes frequent appearances as a guest panelist on The Chris Matthews Show and Meet the Press on NBC, and in the past also appeared on Larry King Live on CNN. She occasionally substitutes for Diane Rehm on The Diane Rehm Show on NPR.On 2 June 2009, Harper Collins published Womenomics, a book written by Kay and ABC News' Good Morning America senior national correspondent Claire Shipman exploring the redefinition of success for working women based on recent trends of the value of women to the business world.On April 15, 2014, HarperBusiness published [sold by HarperCollins Publishers] The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance – What Women Should Know, a book written by Kay and Claire Shipman.Kay is married to ex-BBC reporter and current Control Risks Group senior vice-president Tom Carver. They have four children. She is non-religious and considers herself to be an agnostic.

Read more