The Confidence Game

The Confidence Game Plot Summary

Introduction

Throughout human history, deception has been a constant companion to trust. From the ancient bazaars of Mesopotamia to the digital marketplaces of today, confidence games have evolved alongside civilization itself. The fundamental psychology that makes us vulnerable to deception has remained remarkably consistent across centuries, even as the methods and techniques of deception have transformed. Why do even the most intelligent among us fall prey to con artists? How have confidence games adapted to technological and social changes while maintaining their effectiveness? The exploration of confidence games offers a unique window into human psychology, social dynamics, and the evolution of criminal enterprise. By understanding how con artists identify and exploit vulnerabilities, we gain insight not only into the mechanics of deception but also into the foundations of trust that make society function. This historical journey reveals how confidence games reflect the values, anxieties, and technologies of their eras. Whether you're a student of psychology, a history enthusiast, or simply someone fascinated by the complex dance between trust and deception, this examination of confidence games across time illuminates a persistent yet often overlooked aspect of human interaction.

Chapter 1: Ancient Roots: Trust Mechanisms in Early Human Societies

The foundations of human vulnerability to deception lie in our evolutionary past, stretching back to the earliest human societies. Trust developed as an essential social glue, allowing humans to form cooperative groups and build civilizations. From approximately 10,000 BCE with the rise of settled communities, humans needed mechanisms to determine who could be trusted with resources, responsibilities, and relationships. This fundamental need created the psychological landscape that con artists would later exploit. The ancient world provides our earliest documented confidence games. In Greece and Rome (500 BCE-500 CE), marketplace swindlers employed techniques remarkably similar to modern scams. Roman records describe fake gemstone sellers who would use sleight of hand to swap valuable stones for worthless replicas during transactions. These early con artists understood a crucial psychological principle: humans make trust decisions based on limited information and social cues rather than exhaustive verification. The Oracle at Delphi represented perhaps the most institutionalized form of confidence game in the ancient world, delivering ambiguous prophecies that could be interpreted to match any outcome. Medieval confidence games (500-1500 CE) evolved to exploit the period's religious fervor and hierarchical social structures. False relics became a lucrative trade, with con artists selling everything from splinters of the "true cross" to vials of "saints' blood." The psychology at work reveals how strongly our trust decisions are influenced by authority figures and social proof. When a church official or nobleman endorsed a relic, questioning its authenticity became nearly impossible for the average person. This period demonstrated how confidence games adapt to exploit the dominant values and belief systems of their era. The psychological foundations that make us vulnerable have been studied extensively in modern times. Research shows that humans possess an "optimism bias" that leads us to believe we're less likely than others to be victimized. We also exhibit a "confirmation bias" that causes us to seek information confirming our existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence. As one historian noted, "The most successful confidence games don't create trust from nothing—they identify existing trust and redirect it." This insight explains why intelligent, skeptical people can still fall victim to sophisticated deception. Our vulnerability also stems from what psychologists call the "illusion of attention"—we dramatically overestimate our ability to notice important details in our environment. In a famous experiment, participants watching a video of people passing basketballs failed to notice a person in a gorilla costume walking through the scene. Similarly, victims of confidence games often miss obvious red flags because their attention is directed elsewhere. This psychological tendency has remained constant throughout history, even as the specific methods of misdirection have evolved. The historical record shows that confidence games succeed not by forcing victims to act against their will, but by creating scenarios where victims willingly participate based on false information. This fundamental dynamic—exploiting trust rather than using force—distinguishes confidence games from other forms of crime and explains their persistent effectiveness across vastly different historical periods and cultural contexts. As we'll see, this psychological foundation would support increasingly sophisticated forms of deception as society evolved.

Chapter 2: The Golden Age: Classic Confidence Schemes (1880-1930)

The period from approximately 1880 to 1930 represents what many historians consider the golden age of confidence schemes. This era coincided with massive social and economic transformations: industrialization, urbanization, and the emergence of mass media created perfect conditions for innovative confidence games. Cities swelled with newcomers disconnected from traditional community networks that had previously provided protection against deception. New York, Chicago, and London became hotbeds of sophisticated confidence operations, with professional con artists developing increasingly elaborate schemes. The "big con" emerged as the signature confidence game of this period. Unlike simple street swindles, these elaborate operations involved multiple accomplices, staged environments, and carefully orchestrated scenarios that could unfold over days or weeks. The most famous version, immortalized as "The Sting," was the wire con, where victims believed they were using insider information to bet on fixed horse races. What made these schemes remarkable was their theatrical nature—con artists created entire fake betting parlors with telegraphs, tickers, and dozens of actors playing various roles. As one former confidence man explained, "The big con is the aristocrat of confidence games. It is the Ritz Hotel, when all other con games are fleabags." Charles Ponzi gave his name to one of history's most enduring confidence schemes during this period. In 1920, Ponzi promised investors a 50% return in 45 days through international postal reply coupon arbitrage. The scheme's innovation wasn't the false promise of returns—such promises had existed for centuries—but rather its self-sustaining nature. Early investors received their promised returns, paid from the investments of newcomers rather than legitimate business operations. This created powerful word-of-mouth marketing as satisfied customers became unwitting accomplices. At its peak, Ponzi collected $1 million per week (equivalent to over $13 million today) before the inevitable collapse. The psychology of these classic cons reveals sophisticated understanding of human behavior. Con artists of this era recognized that victims were more likely to trust schemes that appeared to offer inside information or exclusive opportunities. They exploited what psychologists now call "scarcity bias"—our tendency to value things that seem rare or exclusive. The "con" in confidence game refers to the confidence victims place in the swindler, but equally important is the confidence swindlers instill in victims about themselves. Victims of the big con weren't just trusting the operator; they were trusting their own perceived cleverness at spotting an opportunity. Technological innovations of the era were rapidly incorporated into confidence schemes. The telephone enabled "boiler room" operations where swindlers could reach numerous potential victims without face-to-face interaction. Mass-circulation newspapers allowed con artists to reach unprecedented audiences through fraudulent advertisements. One notorious scheme involved selling "Spanish Prisoner" shares, where victims believed they were financing the release of a wealthy prisoner who would reward them handsomely. This scam, a precursor to modern Nigerian Prince emails, generated millions through newspaper classified advertisements. The golden age eventually faced countermeasures as law enforcement developed specialized units to combat confidence crimes. The most famous, New York's "Bunco Squad" (named after a popular rigged dice game), pioneered techniques for identifying and prosecuting confidence operators. However, as one Bunco Squad detective noted, "For every scheme we shut down, three more would appear with new twists." This era established the template for modern confidence games, demonstrating how quickly such schemes adapt to changing social conditions and technologies while exploiting unchanging aspects of human psychology.

Chapter 3: Psychological Weapons: Mastering the Art of Persuasion

The fundamental techniques of persuasion employed by confidence artists have remained remarkably consistent from ancient times through the modern era. Examining the period from approximately 1930 to 1970 reveals how these timeless techniques were refined and systematized. During this era, confidence games became increasingly professionalized, with practitioners developing and sharing sophisticated psychological approaches. This period also saw the first scientific studies of persuasion, with researchers like Robert Cialdini identifying principles that con artists had intuitively understood for centuries. The "foot-in-the-door" technique emerged as one of the most powerful persuasion methods during this period. Con artists discovered that securing small commitments from victims made larger commitments more likely later. A classic example was the "charity con" where victims were first asked to sign a petition for a worthy cause, then later solicited for increasingly large donations to related organizations. Research in the 1960s confirmed the psychological basis for this technique: our desire to maintain consistent self-image makes us more likely to comply with larger requests after agreeing to smaller ones. As one former confidence man explained, "The first 'yes' is the hardest to get. After that, each subsequent 'yes' becomes easier." The post-World War II era saw confidence games increasingly exploit social authority and credentials. The remarkable case of Ferdinand Waldo Demara, known as "The Great Impostor," illustrates this approach. Between 1941 and 1952, Demara successfully impersonated a ship's doctor, a civil engineer, a sheriff's deputy, a prison warden, and a Trappist monk. Despite lacking formal training in these fields, Demara's confident manner and fabricated credentials were rarely questioned. His success demonstrated how strongly authority symbols influence trust decisions. As Demara later explained, "People don't question authority figures. The bigger the claim you make, the more likely you are to be believed." The mid-20th century also saw the refinement of what confidence artists called "the play"—the critical moment when victims are presented with the scheme's false opportunity. Master confidence artists of this era understood that the most effective plays aligned with the victim's existing worldview rather than challenging it. Victor Lustig, who famously "sold" the Eiffel Tower to scrap metal dealers, succeeded because his scheme confirmed what his victims already believed: that government bureaucracy was inefficient and that inside connections created profit opportunities. This principle of exploiting existing beliefs rather than creating new ones remains central to effective persuasion. Emotional manipulation became increasingly sophisticated during this period. Con artists developed techniques to induce specific emotional states that impaired critical thinking. Fear, greed, sympathy, and romantic attraction were all deliberately triggered to create what psychologists call "emotional arousal"—a state where analytical thinking is suppressed in favor of intuitive responses. The "Spanish Prisoner" scheme evolved into the "Lonely Hearts" con, where victims were manipulated through romantic correspondence into sending money to fictitious love interests. These schemes demonstrated how emotional involvement undermines objective assessment of suspicious circumstances. By the 1960s, confidence artists had developed comprehensive frameworks for identifying susceptible victims. They categorized potential marks based on psychological profiles rather than just wealth or social position. One recovered confidence manual from this period described ideal targets as "people who think they're too smart to be fooled." This counterintuitive insight reflects what modern psychology confirms: overconfidence in one's own judgment creates vulnerability. The most sophisticated confidence artists of this era didn't target the naive or uneducated but rather those whose self-perception as shrewd judges of character made them less likely to question their own decisions once committed to a scheme.

Chapter 4: Digital Transformation: From Street Cons to Global Schemes

The period from 1970 to the present has witnessed the most dramatic transformation in confidence games since their inception. The digital revolution created entirely new vectors for deception while simultaneously preserving the psychological principles that have always made confidence games effective. This era began with telephone-based schemes and evolved through early computer networks into today's sophisticated online deceptions that operate across international boundaries with unprecedented scale and efficiency. The 1980s and 1990s saw confidence games increasingly exploit the growing complexity of financial systems. The case of Charles Keating and the Lincoln Savings and Loan scandal demonstrated how traditional confidence techniques could be applied within seemingly legitimate financial institutions. Keating used political connections and manipulated accounting practices to create the appearance of a thriving business while actually operating a scheme that ultimately cost taxpayers $3.4 billion. Similar techniques appeared in the ZZZZ Best case, where Barry Minkow created a phantom carpet-cleaning empire valued at over $300 million before its collapse in 1987. These cases revealed how confidence games were evolving beyond individual swindlers to incorporate corporate structures and regulatory blind spots. The internet fundamentally transformed confidence games beginning in the mid-1990s. Digital communication eliminated geographical constraints and allowed swindlers to operate across international boundaries with minimal risk of prosecution. The Nigerian Prince scam (technically called "Advance Fee Fraud" or "419 Fraud" after the relevant section of the Nigerian criminal code) became the first truly global confidence game, generating estimated annual losses of over $700 million by 2005. What made these schemes particularly effective was their ability to reach millions of potential victims simultaneously through email, creating a business model where even a tiny percentage of successful deceptions generated substantial profits. Social engineering emerged as a critical skill for digital confidence artists. Rather than exploiting technical vulnerabilities in computer systems, these practitioners manipulated human operators through deception. Kevin Mitnick, perhaps the most famous practitioner, demonstrated how persuasive techniques could bypass sophisticated security systems. As Mitnick later explained, "Companies spend millions on firewalls, encryption and secure access devices, and it's money wasted because none of these measures address the weakest link in the security chain: the people who use, administer and operate computer systems." The rise of social media created unprecedented opportunities for identity-based confidence games. Catfishing—creating fictional online personas for deceptive purposes—became a widespread phenomenon. These schemes exploit what psychologists call "hyperpersonal communication," where limited online interactions allow victims to project idealized qualities onto fictional personas. The case of Notre Dame football player Manti Te'o, who developed a relationship with a girlfriend who didn't exist, demonstrated how even public figures could be victimized. Social media platforms also enabled affinity fraud, where con artists claim membership in religious, ethnic, or professional communities to establish trust with victims who share those affiliations. The most sophisticated modern confidence games blend digital techniques with traditional psychological manipulation. Business Email Compromise schemes, which have caused over $26 billion in losses since 2016, begin with digital impersonation of executives or vendors but succeed through social engineering that exploits organizational hierarchies and approval processes. Cryptocurrency scams combine cutting-edge technology with age-old promises of extraordinary returns. As one FBI analyst noted, "Today's confidence artists have new tools, but they're exploiting the same psychological vulnerabilities that have always made confidence games effective." This observation highlights the central paradox of confidence games throughout history: while methods continually evolve, the underlying psychology of deception remains remarkably constant.

Chapter 5: The Science of Vulnerability: Why Everyone Can Be Deceived

The period from approximately 2000 to the present has seen unprecedented scientific investigation into the psychology of deception and belief formation. Advances in cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics, and experimental psychology have revealed the neurological and psychological mechanisms that make even highly intelligent, educated individuals vulnerable to confidence schemes. This research has transformed our understanding of deception from anecdotal observations to evidence-based science, explaining why no one—regardless of intelligence or education—is immune to sophisticated deception. Cognitive biases—systematic errors in thinking that affect decision-making—play a central role in our vulnerability to confidence games. The confirmation bias leads us to favor information that confirms our existing beliefs while discounting contradictory evidence. The sunk cost fallacy makes us reluctant to abandon investments or beliefs once we've committed to them, even when continuing proves costly. The optimism bias causes us to underestimate our personal risk of negative events. Research has demonstrated that these biases aren't signs of low intelligence but rather fundamental features of human cognition that evolved to help us make quick decisions in uncertain environments. As Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman observed, "Intelligence is not a protection against the effects of these biases; in fact, more intelligent people may be even more vulnerable to certain biases." Neuroscience research has revealed how confidence schemes exploit specific brain functions. Functional MRI studies show that uncertainty and fear activate the amygdala, triggering emotional responses that can override analytical thinking. Con artists deliberately create scenarios that activate these emotional circuits while simultaneously presenting opportunities that stimulate the brain's reward centers. This neurological manipulation creates what researchers call "affect heuristics," where decisions are guided by emotional responses rather than analytical assessment. One study found that victims of investment fraud showed heightened activity in brain regions associated with anticipatory reward but reduced activity in regions associated with skepticism and doubt. The psychology of trust has been particularly illuminated by recent research. Studies have identified oxytocin—sometimes called the "trust hormone"—as a key neurochemical that increases trusting behavior. Confidence artists intuitively create interactions that stimulate oxytocin release through techniques like mirroring body language, establishing common ground, and creating situations where small trusts are honored before larger deceptions are attempted. Research has also identified what psychologists call the "truth bias"—our default assumption that what others tell us is truthful rather than deceptive. This cognitive default setting creates an asymmetric challenge: detecting deception requires more cognitive resources than accepting statements at face value. Social influence research has demonstrated how authority, social proof, and scarcity powerfully shape our decisions. Robert Cialdini's landmark studies identified six principles of influence that appear consistently in confidence schemes: reciprocity, commitment/consistency, social proof, authority, liking, and scarcity. These principles operate largely outside conscious awareness, creating what Cialdini calls "click-whirr" responses—automatic behaviors triggered by specific social cues. The most sophisticated confidence artists sequence these triggers to create what one researcher called "a cascade of compliance" that leads victims step-by-step into the scheme. The digital age has created new vulnerabilities through information overload and attention scarcity. Studies show that cognitive depletion—the fatigue that comes from making many decisions or processing large amounts of information—significantly impairs critical thinking and increases susceptibility to deception. This explains why online confidence schemes often target victims through high-volume communications that create decision fatigue. Research has also identified the "online disinhibition effect," where the psychological distance created by digital communication reduces normal caution and skepticism. As one study concluded, "The same person who would carefully verify the credentials of a financial advisor met in person often fails to apply equal scrutiny to online investment opportunities."

Chapter 6: Breaking the Cycle: Effective Countermeasures and Resilience

Throughout history, individuals and institutions have developed countermeasures against confidence games, with varying degrees of success. The modern era, particularly from 1990 to the present, has seen the emergence of systematic approaches to combating deception based on historical patterns, psychological research, and technological tools. These efforts provide valuable lessons not only for preventing victimization but also for understanding the persistent nature of confidence games in human society. Law enforcement approaches to confidence games have evolved significantly. The FBI's creation of the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) in 2000 represented a recognition that digital confidence games required specialized expertise and coordination. By 2019, IC3 was processing over 1,300 complaints daily and had developed sophisticated algorithms to identify patterns across seemingly unrelated cases. Similarly, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) pioneered the use of artificial intelligence to detect suspicious transaction patterns that might indicate confidence schemes. These institutional responses acknowledge what historians of confidence games have long observed: while specific schemes evolve rapidly, they typically follow recognizable patterns that can be identified with sufficient data and analytical tools. Individual victims who successfully fought back against confidence artists share common approaches that offer valuable lessons. The case of Johnathan Walton, who was defrauded by a woman claiming to be a wealthy heiress, demonstrates the power of systematic evidence gathering. After discovering the deception, Walton meticulously documented his experience, connected with other victims, and compiled evidence that ultimately led to the perpetrator's conviction. Similarly, investment fraud whistleblowers like Harry Markopolos, who warned about Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme years before its collapse, succeeded by focusing on objective financial impossibilities rather than subjective assessments of character. These cases illustrate what psychologists call "process accountability"—evaluating decisions based on the quality of the process rather than intuitive judgments. Educational approaches have shown promise in reducing vulnerability to confidence games. Research demonstrates that general warnings about fraud have limited effectiveness, but specific training in recognizing the psychological techniques used by confidence artists significantly improves resistance. One study found that individuals who received training in identifying specific persuasion tactics were 23% less likely to comply with deceptive requests three months later. These educational interventions work by creating what psychologists call "implementation intentions"—specific if-then plans for responding to potential deception attempts. As one researcher explained, "We can't eliminate the psychological vulnerabilities that confidence artists exploit, but we can create conscious strategies for recognizing and responding to manipulation attempts." Technological countermeasures have evolved alongside digital confidence games. Artificial intelligence systems now analyze email communications to identify linguistic patterns associated with deception. Blockchain technology offers potential solutions to certain types of financial confidence games through immutable transaction records. Biometric authentication reduces the effectiveness of impersonation-based schemes. However, technology alone has proven insufficient, as confidence artists rapidly adapt to technical countermeasures. The most effective approaches combine technological tools with human judgment in what security experts call "defense in depth"—multiple layers of protection that address both technical and psychological vulnerabilities. Perhaps the most important lesson from successful countermeasures is the value of community and information sharing. Confidence games thrive on isolation, with victims often kept unaware of others being similarly deceived. Platforms that enable victims to share experiences—like the Better Business Bureau's Scam Tracker or the Reddit forum r/Scams—create collective intelligence that identifies new schemes more quickly than institutional responses alone. These community-based approaches reflect what sociologists call "social immunology"—the development of collective resistance through shared experience and knowledge. As one researcher noted, "The same social networks that confidence artists exploit to identify victims can become powerful tools for prevention when properly leveraged."

Summary

Throughout history, confidence games have evolved in their methods while exploiting unchanging aspects of human psychology. From ancient marketplace swindles to sophisticated digital deceptions, these schemes have consistently targeted fundamental cognitive processes rather than individual deficiencies. The central tension that emerges across this historical examination is between trust—the essential social glue that enables cooperation and progress—and the vulnerability that trust necessarily creates. Confidence games exploit this tension, turning our social and psychological strengths into vulnerabilities through sophisticated manipulation of cognitive biases, emotional responses, and social dynamics. This historical perspective offers crucial insights for navigating a world where deception continues to evolve. First, we must recognize that vulnerability to deception is universal rather than exceptional—a product of cognitive processes that serve us well in most circumstances. Second, effective protection comes not from eliminating trust but from developing specific skills for evaluating claims and recognizing manipulation attempts. Finally, community resilience through information sharing and collective vigilance provides our strongest defense against confidence games. By understanding deception as a persistent feature of human interaction rather than an anomaly, we can develop more realistic and effective approaches to protecting ourselves and others while preserving the trust that makes society possible.

About Author

Loading...

Maria Konnikova

Read more

Related Books by Maria Konnikova

Loading...

The Biggest Bluff

Maria Konnikova

How I Learned to Pay Attention, Master Myself, and Win

★★★★☆4.1