The Demon of Unrest

The Demon of Unrest Plot Summary

Introduction

The bombardment of Fort Sumter in April 1861 marked the dramatic opening act of America's bloodiest conflict. For thirty-four hours, Confederate batteries pounded the federal fortress in Charleston Harbor while the nation and world watched in suspense. Yet this seemingly sudden eruption of violence was the culmination of decades of growing sectional tensions, political compromises, and fundamentally incompatible visions of America's future. The crisis that unfolded between Abraham Lincoln's election in November 1860 and the first shots in April 1861 reveals how political disputes can transform into existential conflicts when compromise becomes impossible. Through the Fort Sumter crisis, we witness how the breakdown of America's political institutions led to civil war. The events illuminate three crucial historical questions: How did a constitutional republic designed to resolve conflicts peacefully descend into violence? What role did individual decisions by Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, and military commanders play in determining whether peace or war would prevail? And perhaps most importantly, how did slavery—an institution that had existed since colonial times—finally tear the nation apart? This historical journey offers valuable insights for anyone interested in American history, political leadership during crisis, or understanding how societies can become so divided that peaceful coexistence becomes impossible.

Chapter 1: Seeds of Division: Slavery and Sectional Tensions (1820-1860)

The roots of America's Civil War extended back decades before the first shots at Fort Sumter. Between 1820 and 1860, the United States underwent profound economic and social transformations that created increasingly distinct sectional identities. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 represented an early attempt to balance power between free and slave states, prohibiting slavery north of the 36°30' parallel in the Louisiana Territory. This temporary solution masked deeper tensions that would resurface repeatedly as America expanded westward. By the 1830s, the North and South were developing along dramatically different trajectories. The North embraced industrialization, free labor, and increasingly, moral opposition to slavery. The abolitionist movement gained momentum with William Lloyd Garrison's founding of The Liberator in 1831 and the publication of Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin in 1852, which sold over 300,000 copies in its first year. Meanwhile, the South doubled down on cotton production and slave labor, particularly after Eli Whitney's cotton gin made plantation agriculture more profitable than ever. As South Carolina's James Henry Hammond declared in 1858, the South's planter class considered themselves "essentially what the nobility are in other countries," developing a distinctive culture centered on honor, hierarchy, and racial control. The territorial expansion of the 1840s and 1850s repeatedly forced the slavery question back to the forefront of national politics. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) added vast new territories to the United States, reigniting debates over slavery's expansion. The Compromise of 1850 temporarily eased tensions, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 shattered the fragile peace by repealing the Missouri Compromise and allowing popular sovereignty to determine slavery's status in new territories. This led to bloody confrontations in "Bleeding Kansas," where pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers fought for control. The Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision in 1857 further inflamed sectional tensions by declaring that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in federal territories. Political institutions that had once bridged sectional divides began to crumble. The Whig Party disintegrated in the 1850s, unable to maintain a coherent position on slavery. The Democratic Party, the last remaining national party, split along sectional lines at its 1860 convention. Into this vacuum stepped the new Republican Party, formed in 1854 specifically to oppose slavery's expansion. Though Republicans insisted they would not interfere with slavery where it already existed, their fundamental opposition to the institution's spread threatened the South's vision of its future. When William Seward, a leading Republican, described the conflict as an "irrepressible conflict" between "opposing and enduring forces," he captured the fundamental truth that compromise was becoming impossible. By 1860, North and South had developed fundamentally different understandings of American identity and values. Northerners increasingly viewed slavery as incompatible with the nation's founding principles of liberty and equality. Southerners had convinced themselves that slavery was divinely sanctioned, beneficial to both races, and essential to their way of life. This ideological gulf made peaceful resolution increasingly difficult. As Abraham Lincoln observed in his famous "House Divided" speech of 1858: "I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free." The stage was set for a confrontation that would determine whether the American experiment in self-government could survive its deepest internal contradiction.

Chapter 2: The Election of 1860: Lincoln's Victory and Southern Reaction

The presidential election of 1860 unfolded against a backdrop of unprecedented sectional tension. For the first time, Americans faced a truly sectional election with four major candidates representing different regional interests. The Democratic Party, unable to agree on a candidate or platform, split into Northern and Southern factions. Northern Democrats nominated Stephen Douglas on a platform of popular sovereignty, while Southern Democrats selected John C. Breckinridge on a pro-slavery platform. A third party, the Constitutional Union Party, nominated John Bell on a platform that simply pledged allegiance to "the Constitution, the Union, and the enforcement of the laws," avoiding the slavery question entirely. Abraham Lincoln, the Republican nominee, campaigned on a platform opposing slavery's expansion while repeatedly assuring Southerners he had no intention of interfering with slavery where it already existed. Nevertheless, Lincoln's name did not even appear on ballots in ten Southern states. On November 6, 1860, Lincoln won the presidency with just 40% of the popular vote but a clear Electoral College majority, carrying every Northern state except New Jersey. This geographic polarization was striking—Lincoln had become president without winning a single Southern electoral vote, making him appear to Southerners as a purely sectional candidate imposed upon them by Northern voters. The reaction in the South was swift and dramatic. On November 10, just four days after Lincoln's election, the South Carolina legislature unanimously called for a special convention to consider secession. Edmund Ruffin, an elderly Virginia planter and fierce secessionist, rushed to South Carolina to witness what he hoped would be the birth of a Southern nation. On December 20, 1860, South Carolina's convention unanimously approved an ordinance declaring that "the union now subsisting between South Carolina and other States, under the name of 'The United States of America,' is hereby dissolved." That evening, delegates signed the ordinance amid cheers and celebration in a ceremony deliberately designed to echo the signing of the Declaration of Independence. South Carolina's declaration made clear that slavery was at the heart of its decision. The convention issued a formal statement explaining that Northern states had "denounced as sinful the institution of slavery" and elected a president "whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery." This explicit acknowledgment contradicted later attempts to downplay slavery as the cause of secession. By February 1861, six more states had followed South Carolina's lead: Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. Each cited the protection of slavery as their primary motivation. Mississippi's declaration was particularly blunt: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world." President James Buchanan, in his final months in office, found himself paralyzed by the crisis. In his annual message to Congress on December 3, he had argued that while secession was illegal, the federal government lacked constitutional authority to prevent it. This ambiguous position pleased no one. Northern Republicans condemned his inaction, while Southern Democrats felt betrayed when he refused to surrender federal forts in Charleston Harbor. As one observer noted, the secessionists were "driving politicians before them like sheep," with moderate voices increasingly drowned out by extremists on both sides. The election of 1860 and its immediate aftermath revealed how deeply the nation had divided. What had begun as political disagreements had evolved into a profound cultural divide with competing visions of America's future. The speed of secession shocked even those who had predicted it, demonstrating how thoroughly the South had convinced itself that Lincoln's election threatened not just their property rights but their entire way of life. As the president-elect prepared to travel to Washington for his inauguration, the question was no longer whether the Union would fracture, but whether that fracture would lead to peace or war.

Chapter 3: Fort Sumter: Strategic Standoff in Charleston Harbor

Charleston Harbor became the focal point of the secession crisis in December 1860. Three federal fortifications guarded the harbor: Fort Moultrie on Sullivan's Island, Castle Pinckney, and the massive but unfinished Fort Sumter on an artificial island in the harbor's center. Major Robert Anderson, a 55-year-old Kentucky-born officer, commanded just 75 men at Fort Moultrie. Though Southern by birth and sympathetic to the South, Anderson remained steadfastly loyal to his oath as an Army officer. His precarious position at Fort Moultrie, vulnerable to attack from the mainland, concerned him deeply as South Carolina militia units drilled openly nearby. On December 26, under cover of darkness, Anderson made a fateful decision that would transform the crisis. Without orders from Washington, he evacuated Fort Moultrie and relocated his entire command to the more defensible Fort Sumter. This tactical move, executed with remarkable stealth, took South Carolina authorities completely by surprise. Anderson's men spiked the guns at Moultrie, burned the gun carriages, and slipped away by boat to Sumter. By morning, the American flag flew over the imposing pentagonal fortress in the harbor's center, visible to all of Charleston. Anderson's move electrified both North and South. Northerners celebrated it as a bold act of patriotism, while South Carolinians viewed it as a betrayal of President Buchanan's alleged promise not to alter the military status quo. Governor Francis Pickens immediately ordered state militia to seize all remaining federal properties in Charleston, including the abandoned Fort Moultrie and Castle Pinckney. The governor then demanded that Anderson return to Moultrie. "My compliments to the Governor," Anderson replied. "I decline to accede to his request." This exchange set the pattern for the standoff that would continue for months. Fort Sumter itself presented a formidable military challenge. Built on an artificial island of granite blocks, the massive five-sided fort had walls forty feet high and eight to twelve feet thick. When completed, it was designed to house 146 guns and a garrison of 650 men. However, Anderson's small force of 75 men faced significant challenges. The fort remained unfinished, with many gun emplacements empty. More critically, Anderson had limited provisions and no clear path for reinforcement. From Sumter's parapets, the garrison could watch as Confederate forces constructed artillery batteries on surrounding islands, using hundreds of enslaved laborers to build fortifications aimed at the federal outpost. The first attempt to resupply Fort Sumter came on January 9, 1861, when the unarmed merchant vessel Star of the West approached Charleston Harbor. As the ship entered the harbor, cadets from the Citadel fired upon it from a hidden battery on Morris Island, forcing it to retreat without delivering its cargo. Anderson, though authorized to return fire, held back, unwilling to trigger a war without explicit orders. This restraint reflected his complex position as a Southern-born officer loyal to the Union but hoping to avoid bloodshed. "In this controversy between the North and the South, my sympathies are entirely with the South," he told South Carolina officials. Yet he felt duty-bound to hold the fort until ordered otherwise. By February 1861, the standoff at Fort Sumter had become a symbol of the larger constitutional crisis. For Southerners, federal occupation of the fort within a "sovereign" state was an intolerable affront to their dignity. For Northerners, surrendering the fort would mean accepting disunion. As the newly formed Confederate States of America assumed control of the crisis from South Carolina, and Abraham Lincoln prepared to take office, Fort Sumter emerged as the flashpoint that would likely determine whether the secession crisis would end in peaceful separation or war. The fate of the Union hung in the balance, with seventy-five soldiers caught in the middle of a constitutional crisis that had been brewing for decades.

Chapter 4: Lincoln's Dilemma: Navigating Between Peace and War

Abraham Lincoln won the presidency on November 6, 1860, but would not take office until March 4, 1861—a four-month interregnum that proved disastrous for the nation. During this period, seven states seceded, formed the Confederate States of America, and seized federal properties throughout the South. Yet Lincoln remained in Springfield, Illinois, maintaining public silence while the crisis deepened. This silence was strategic rather than indifferent; Lincoln believed that speaking out would only inflame tensions further. "What is it I could say which would quiet the alarm?" Lincoln wrote to a friend. "Is it that no interference by the government, with slaves or slavery within the states, is intended? I have said this so often already, that a repetition of it is but mockery." Lincoln's journey to Washington in February 1861 was fraught with both symbolic and literal danger. Traveling by train through Northern cities, he delivered carefully crafted speeches that avoided inflammatory language while still affirming his commitment to preserving the Union. The journey culminated in a controversial pre-dawn arrival in Washington on February 23—Lincoln traveling incognito after detectives uncovered a possible assassination plot in Baltimore. This secretive passage later subjected Lincoln to ridicule, with political cartoons depicting him sneaking into the capital in disguise. Yet the threat was real; Baltimore was a hotbed of secessionist sentiment, and its police chief had made clear he would not provide protection for the president-elect. Upon taking office on March 4, Lincoln faced an unprecedented crisis with no clear constitutional guidance. His inaugural address walked a careful line, promising he had "no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery" where it existed, while firmly declaring secession illegal and vowing to "hold, occupy, and possess" federal property. The Fort Sumter dilemma presented Lincoln with no good options. Military advisors, including General-in-Chief Winfield Scott, initially recommended evacuating the fort as militarily untenable. Secretary of State William Seward advocated abandonment to avoid provoking war while pursuing diplomatic solutions. Others, particularly Postmaster General Montgomery Blair, argued that surrendering Sumter without resistance would demoralize the North and legitimize the Confederacy. Lincoln's approach to this problem revealed his political acumen. Rather than making an immediate decision, he gathered information from multiple sources. He sent trusted emissaries to Charleston to assess the situation firsthand. He requested detailed military assessments of the feasibility of reinforcing the fort. Most importantly, he carefully considered the political implications of each possible course of action. As he told his secretary John Hay: "The people have got to understand that there is going to be a government." By late March, Lincoln had reached his decision—he would attempt to resupply Fort Sumter with provisions only, not military reinforcements. This subtle distinction was crucial. By sending food rather than troops or weapons, Lincoln could frame the mission as humanitarian rather than aggressive. On April 6, he notified South Carolina Governor Pickens of his intention to send provisions to the fort, adding that no troops, arms, or ammunition would be sent unless the relief mission was resisted. This strategy placed the burden of initiating hostilities squarely on Confederate shoulders. If they allowed the provisions through, Anderson's garrison could remain indefinitely, undermining Confederate claims to sovereignty. If they fired on an unarmed relief expedition, they would appear as aggressors, uniting Northern opinion behind Lincoln and justifying a military response. Lincoln's handling of the Fort Sumter crisis demonstrated his remarkable ability to navigate between competing imperatives—preserving the Union without appearing as the aggressor, upholding federal authority while avoiding unnecessary bloodshed, and maintaining Republican support while not alienating border states that remained in the Union. As he later explained: "They chose to make it a test question, and I took it up, and I have tried to act as forbearing as I possibly could." The decision would prove pivotal in determining how the secession crisis would ultimately be resolved.

Chapter 5: First Shots: The Bombardment and Its Immediate Consequences

At 4:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861, a signal shot from a mortar battery on James Island arced over Charleston Harbor. Within moments, Confederate batteries opened fire from all directions, bombarding Fort Sumter with a ferocity that would continue for 34 hours. Edmund Ruffin, the elderly Virginia secessionist who had traveled to Charleston to witness the birth of the Confederacy, was granted the honor of firing one of the first shots from the Iron Battery on Morris Island—a symbolic moment that would forever link him to the start of the Civil War. Inside Fort Sumter, Major Anderson initially held his fire. His 85 men, including officers, engineers, and musicians, took shelter in the fort's bombproof casemates as shells exploded overhead and solid shot pounded the walls. Not until 7:30 a.m., after the men had breakfast, did Anderson order his gunners to return fire. Captain Abner Doubleday, who would later be credited with inventing baseball, pulled the lanyard to discharge Sumter's first shot against the rebellion. The garrison's response was limited by ammunition shortages and the need to protect their powder supplies, allowing them to fire only intermittently while Confederate batteries maintained a steady barrage. The bombardment continued throughout the day and night, with the situation inside the fort growing increasingly desperate. Hot shot—cannonballs heated in furnaces—had set the wooden barracks ablaze. Smoke filled the fort, making it difficult to breathe. The garrison's food supplies were nearly exhausted, with only salt pork remaining. The crisis reached its peak when fire threatened the fort's powder magazine. Anderson ordered most of the remaining gunpowder thrown into the sea to prevent a catastrophic explosion. By early afternoon of April 13, with the fort's flagstaff shot away, the American flag was nailed to a makeshift pole. After 34 hours of bombardment, Anderson agreed to surrender terms. He would evacuate the fort the following day, with his garrison allowed to salute the U.S. flag before departure. During this salute on April 14, a tragic accident occurred when a premature explosion killed Private Daniel Hough, the only fatality of the bombardment itself. Anderson and his men then boarded a steamer that would take them to the waiting relief fleet, which had arrived off Charleston during the bombardment but made no attempt to enter the harbor. As the garrison departed, Confederate troops occupied the battered fort, raising their own flag over the prize they had won. The immediate impact of Fort Sumter's fall was electric. In Charleston, celebrations erupted with bonfires, fireworks, and jubilant crowds. The Confederate victory seemed to validate secession and promise a quick path to independence. Jefferson Davis proclaimed: "There can be no longer any doubt that the strife between the two sections must be settled by the sword." In the North, news of the attack produced an overwhelming surge of patriotic fervor. The bombardment of the American flag—not abstract constitutional arguments about secession—provided a clear rallying point. On April 15, Lincoln issued a proclamation calling for 75,000 militia to suppress the rebellion. Northern states quickly exceeded their quotas of volunteers. The bombardment of Fort Sumter transformed the secession crisis from a constitutional dispute into open warfare. Lincoln's call for troops forced border states to choose sides—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina soon joined the Confederacy, nearly doubling its territory and population. The garrison's commander, Robert Anderson, promoted to brigadier general, became a national hero whose tour of Northern cities helped drive recruitment efforts. What had begun as a 34-hour bombardment without a single combat fatality had set in motion a conflict that would ultimately claim over 750,000 American lives and fundamentally reshape the nation.

Chapter 6: From Limited Conflict to Total War: The Expanding Struggle

The weeks following Fort Sumter's surrender witnessed a rapid transformation of the sectional crisis into full-scale military mobilization. Lincoln's call for 75,000 militia volunteers catalyzed both Northern patriotism and Southern defiance. In Northern cities, recruitment offices were overwhelmed with men eager to enlist for what most believed would be a brief, decisive conflict. Newspapers that had previously advocated compromise now demanded a vigorous prosecution of the war to preserve the Union. Mary Chesnut, wife of a Confederate official, captured the Southern perspective in her diary: "We are separated from the North forever now. The President has called for 75,000 men to subdue us. We are to be wiped off the face of the earth." The early months of the war were characterized by mutual delusions. Northerners believed a quick show of force would crush the "rebellion," while Southerners expected either a swift victory or European intervention on their behalf due to cotton's economic importance. These illusions were shattered at the Battle of Bull Run (Manassas) in July 1861, where Confederate forces repulsed a Union advance on Richmond, demonstrating that neither side would achieve easy victory. The battle's shocking casualties—nearly 5,000 killed, wounded, or missing—dispelled notions that the war would be bloodless or brief. As the conflict expanded, its character fundamentally changed. What began as a limited war to restore the Union gradually evolved into a revolutionary struggle that would destroy slavery. Lincoln initially emphasized preserving the Union alone, famously writing to Horace Greeley in August 1862: "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it." Yet military necessity and moral evolution led to the Emancipation Proclamation in January 1863, transforming the war's purpose and character. The conflict became not just a battle between armies but between societies and economic systems. The war's scale and brutality exceeded all expectations. Modern technologies—railroads, telegraphs, rifled artillery, and mass-produced weapons—combined with Napoleonic tactics to produce unprecedented carnage. Major battles like Shiloh, Antietam, and Gettysburg saw casualties in the tens of thousands. The conflict's industrial nature favored the North, with its superior manufacturing, population, and naval power, allowing it to implement General Winfield Scott's "Anaconda Plan" to strangle the Confederate economy through blockade and control of the Mississippi River. By 1864, the war had evolved into what historian James McPherson called "hard war"—deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure and resources that supported the Confederate war effort. General William T. Sherman's March to the Sea through Georgia exemplified this approach, destroying railroads, factories, plantations, and anything else that might sustain Confederate resistance. This strategy proved devastatingly effective against the South's limited industrial base and agricultural economy. As Sherman himself explained: "We are not only fighting hostile armies, but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war." The war finally ended in April 1865 with Lee's surrender at Appomattox Court House, followed by the capitulation of remaining Confederate forces. The human cost was staggering—approximately 750,000 deaths, or about 2.5% of the American population. The conflict's aftermath brought constitutional revolution through the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which abolished slavery and attempted to establish equal citizenship. Yet the promise of genuine equality would remain unfulfilled for another century, as white Southerners reasserted control during Reconstruction and established Jim Crow segregation. The Fort Sumter crisis had indeed contained the seeds of civil war—not just in the immediate events of April 1861, but in the deeper contradictions of American society that had been building for decades. The bombardment merely lit the fuse on a powder keg of sectional tensions, constitutional disputes, economic differences, and fundamentally incompatible visions of freedom and nationhood that could no longer be contained through political compromise.

Summary

The Fort Sumter crisis represents a profound failure of American political institutions to resolve fundamental conflicts through peaceful means. What began as a constitutional dispute over federal authority versus state rights quickly evolved into a confrontation over competing visions of America's future. The crisis revealed how slavery had become not merely a moral issue but the cornerstone of two incompatible economic and social systems. When Abraham Lincoln won the 1860 election without a single Southern electoral vote, it exposed the breakdown of national political parties that had previously bridged sectional divides. The subsequent decisions—South Carolina's secession, Anderson's move to Fort Sumter, Lincoln's provision resupply plan, and the Confederate order to fire—followed a tragic logic where each side felt compelled to defend principles they considered non-negotiable. The lessons of this pivotal moment continue to resonate today. First, the crisis demonstrates how political polarization can transform disagreements into existential conflicts where compromise becomes impossible. When opposing sides no longer share basic assumptions about national identity, peaceful resolution becomes extraordinarily difficult. Second, it highlights the danger of miscalculation—Confederate leaders believed firing on Fort Sumter would solidify their independence with minimal bloodshed, yet it triggered a war that devastated the South. Finally, the crisis underscores how symbols and perceptions often matter more than strategic realities in political conflicts. Fort Sumter had limited military significance, but its symbolic importance as federal property in a seceded state made it the flashpoint where America's deepest divisions erupted into violence, launching a transformative conflict that would redefine the nation.

About Author

Loading...

Erik Larson

Erik Larson is the author of nine books and one audio-only novella. His latest book, The Demon of Unrest, is a non-fiction thriller about the five months between Lincoln’s election and the start of the Civil War. Six of his books became New York Times bestsellers. Two of these, The Splendid and the Vile: A Saga of Churchill, Family, and Defiance During the Blitz and Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania, both hit no. 1 on the list soon after launch. His chronicle of the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893, The Devil in the White City, was a finalist for the National Book Award, and won an Edgar Award for fact-crime writing. It lingered on various Times bestseller lists for the better part of a decade and is currently in development at Disney Studios. Erik’s In the Garden of Beasts, about how America’s first ambassador to Nazi Germany and his daughter experienced the rising terror of Hitler’s rule, is currently in development with StudioCanal and Playtone.Erik’s first book of narrative nonfiction, Isaac’s Storm, about the giant hurricane that destroyed Galveston, Texas, in 1900, won the American Meteorology Society’s prestigious Louis J. Battan Author’s Award. The Washington Post called it the “Jaws of hurricane yarns.” Erik is particularly pleased to have won the Chicago Public Library Foundation’s 2016 Carl Sandburg Literary Award for Non-Fiction.His audio novella, No One Goes Alone, while a work of fiction, is a ghost story based on real-life events and characters, including famed 19th-century psychologist William James. Erik refers to it as a ghost story with footnotes.He graduated summa cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania, where he studied Russian history, language and culture; he received a masters in journalism from Columbia University. After a brief stint at the Bucks County Courier Times, Erik became a staff writer for The Wall Street Journal, and later a contributing writer for Time Magazine. His magazine stories have appeared in The New Yorker, The Atlantic Monthly, Harper’s, and other publications.He has taught non-fiction writing at San Francisco State, the Johns Hopkins Writing Seminars, the University of Oregon, and the Chuckanut Writers Conference in Bellingham, Wash., and has spoken to audiences from coast to coast. A former resident of Seattle, he now lives in Manhattan with his wife, a neonatologist, who is also the author of the nonfiction memoir, Almost Home, which, as Erik puts it, “could make a stone cry.” They have three daughters in far-flung locations and professions. Their beloved dog Molly resides in an urn on a shelf overlooking Central Park, where they like to think she now spends most of her time.

Read more

Related Books by Erik Larson

Loading...

The Splendid and the Vile

Erik Larson

A Saga of Churchill, Family, and Defiance During the Blitz

★★★★☆4.3

Loading...

The Devil in the White City

Erik Larson

Murder, Magic and Madness at the Fair that Changed America

★★★★☆4.0

Loading...

Thunderstruck

Erik Larson

One of the Greatest Criminal Chases of All Time

★★★½☆3.8

Loading...

Isaac's Storm

Erik Larson

A Man, a Time, and the Deadliest Hurricane in History

★★★★☆4.0