The Everything War

The Everything War Plot Summary

Introduction

In the summer of 1994, as most Americans were enjoying hits like "The Sign" by Ace of Base and watching Home Improvement on television, a 30-year-old former hedge fund employee named Jeff Bezos embarked on a cross-country drive with his wife MacKenzie. During this journey, he typed out a business plan on his laptop for what would become one of the most transformative companies in modern history. This moment marked the beginning of an extraordinary commercial saga that would reshape not just retail, but entire industries across the global economy. The transformation of Amazon from an online bookstore to a trillion-dollar conglomerate reveals fundamental tensions in American capitalism and technology. How did a company that consistently prioritized growth over profits manage to defy traditional business logic and become one of the world's most valuable enterprises? What happens when a company's relentless focus on customer experience creates a flywheel effect so powerful it eventually threatens competition across multiple industries? And perhaps most importantly, what are the consequences when a single corporation amasses unprecedented power over commerce, cloud computing, entertainment, and even the physical infrastructure of the internet itself? These questions lie at the heart of understanding not just Amazon's rise, but the broader implications of digital monopolies in the 21st century.

Chapter 1: Strategic Foundations: Tax Advantages and Early Growth (1994-2000)

When Jeff Bezos founded Amazon in 1994, the internet was still in its infancy, with fewer than 3% of Americans having ever signed onto the World Wide Web. Traditional retail dominated the commercial landscape, with malls serving as community gathering places and shopping destinations. Main Street was filled with local toy stores, boutiques, and specialty shops, while big box retailers like Circuit City, Borders, and Toys "R" Us had established giant footprints across America. The notion that online shopping could displace these physical retail experiences seemed more fantasy than possibility. Yet Bezos, with his analytical mind, recognized the internet's exponential growth as a once-in-a-lifetime business opportunity. After studying various product categories, he determined that books presented the ideal initial opportunity – they were standardized items with millions of titles that no single physical store could stock, and they were small enough to ship inexpensively. But perhaps most critically, Bezos made a strategic decision that would give Amazon a significant competitive advantage: he chose Seattle as his headquarters partly for tax reasons. Washington state had a small enough population that Amazon could ship books to customers across the rest of the country tax-free, with only customers in states where the company maintained physical operations paying sales tax. This tax arbitrage strategy became a crucial edge for Amazon during its formative years. Traditional retailers like Sears and Toys "R" Us were required to collect sales tax in every state where they operated physical stores, which typically meant nationwide. When both Amazon and Sears sold the same $500 television, Sears had to collect an additional $42 in sales tax in a state with an 8.5% rate. To remain competitive, Sears would often lower its price to match Amazon's total, frequently selling at a loss. As former Toys "R" Us CEO Jerry Storch explained, "Amazon knew exactly what they were doing." Amazon's early growth was remarkable by any standard. Within its first week of operation in July 1995, the company had $12,438 in sales. By the end of that year, sales hit $511,000. In May 1997, Amazon went public at $18 per share, raising $54 million and giving the company a valuation exceeding $560 million – despite having never shown a profit. This willingness to prioritize growth over profitability would become a hallmark of Amazon's approach, fundamentally changing how Wall Street valued technology companies and creating a model that countless startups would later emulate. What distinguished Amazon from the beginning was Bezos's unwavering focus on the long term. "We will continue to make investment decisions in light of long-term market leadership considerations rather than short-term profitability," he wrote to shareholders in his first annual letter – a philosophy that would guide Amazon for decades. By leveraging tax advantages, relentlessly focusing on customer experience, and prioritizing growth over immediate profits, Bezos laid the strategic foundations for what would eventually become not just an e-commerce giant, but a digital empire spanning multiple industries and reshaping the very nature of retail and technology.

Chapter 2: Building the Marketplace: Creating Seller Dependency (2000-2010)

As the new millennium began, Amazon had established itself as the dominant online bookseller, but Bezos had much grander ambitions. His vision wasn't just about books – it was about creating the "everything store," a digital marketplace where customers could find virtually any product they desired. The early 2000s marked a critical phase in Amazon's evolution as the company survived the dot-com crash that wiped out many internet companies and began implementing the strategies that would transform it from a retailer into a platform. A pivotal moment came in 2000 when Amazon launched its third-party Marketplace, allowing outside sellers to list their products on Amazon's website. This move was fiercely debated internally, as it meant Amazon would now compete with itself – the team selling Amazon's own inventory would face competition from third-party sellers offering the same products. Despite these concerns, Bezos pushed forward, recognizing that Marketplace was the quickest way to achieve the unlimited selection he envisioned. This decision would prove transformative, as third-party sales eventually grew to represent more than 60% of Amazon's retail business. During this period, Amazon began developing what Bezos would later call the "flywheel" – a self-reinforcing loop that accelerates as it's fed. Adding more third-party sellers increased product selection, which attracted more customers. More customers attracted more sellers, who competed on price to win sales. Lower prices brought in even more customers, spinning the flywheel faster and faster. This virtuous cycle created powerful network effects that made Amazon increasingly difficult to compete with, as each new seller and customer added value to the entire ecosystem. However, as Amazon's Marketplace grew, the company's relationship with its sellers evolved in troubling ways. Initially positioned as a partnership, the relationship increasingly resembled what many described as "indentured servitude." Amazon steadily increased the fees it charged sellers – from commissions (typically 15%) to fulfillment costs and mandatory advertising expenses. According to research from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Amazon's "take rate" from third-party sales grew from 19% in 2014 to an astonishing 45% by 2023. Many sellers reported feeling trapped in a system where they had little choice but to accept Amazon's terms, as their own websites lost traffic while their Amazon sales grew. Beyond fees, sellers faced numerous other challenges: account suspensions without notice, competition from counterfeit products, and the constant fear that Amazon might copy their successful items. Billy Carmen, who sells patio products, described feeling "like being held as a prisoner with Amazon." The company regularly demanded sensitive information about suppliers and manufacturing processes, leading many sellers to worry their products would be replicated. Yet despite these concerns, most sellers couldn't afford to leave the platform – Amazon had become too dominant in online retail. By 2010, Amazon had transformed from a retailer into a marketplace, but one where it maintained extraordinary control over its participants. The company had created a system where millions of businesses became dependent on its infrastructure while having minimal leverage to negotiate terms. This asymmetric power relationship would become increasingly problematic as Amazon expanded into creating its own products to compete directly with the very sellers who relied on its platform. The seeds of what critics would later call Amazon's "monopoly power" were firmly planted during this decade, setting the stage for the regulatory challenges that would eventually follow.

Chapter 3: Data Exploitation: Copying Products and Suppressing Competition (2010-2016)

Between 2010 and 2016, Amazon refined a controversial business practice that would eventually attract significant regulatory scrutiny: using its vast troves of seller data to identify successful products and then creating competing versions under its own private label brands. This strategy leveraged Amazon's unique position as both a retailer and a marketplace, giving it unprecedented visibility into which third-party products were selling well, at what price points, and with what profit margins – information no traditional retailer could access about its suppliers. The company's private label business had begun modestly in 2009 with the launch of Amazon Basics, initially offering simple products like blank DVDs and cables. The early approach to developing these products was relatively straightforward – Amazon employees would look at industry trend reports and attend trade shows to find products they could manufacture under the Amazon Basics brand. However, as Amazon's data capabilities grew more sophisticated, so did its approach to private label products. By 2017, Bezos was expressing dissatisfaction with Amazon's private label performance, demanding growth from around 1% of retail sales to 10% within five years – creating intense pressure throughout the organization to rapidly develop successful products. Despite Amazon's public claims about protecting seller data, the reality inside the company was quite different. Multiple employees from Amazon's private label team described a systematic process for identifying and copying successful third-party products. An Amazon employee in Seattle would analyze detailed reports on third-party sellers' bestselling items, selecting those with the highest sales volumes and margins. This information would then be sent to Amazon's team in Shenzhen, China, who would order the product for inspection and find manufacturers to produce Amazon's version. The case of Fortem, a small Brooklyn-based company with four employees, illustrates this practice. In 2016, founders Yuriy Petriv and Oleg Maslakov began selling car accessories they designed, including a popular trunk organizer. Their product became the top seller in its category on Amazon. In early 2019, an Amazon private label employee pulled a detailed report on Fortem's metrics, showing they had sold 33,000 units generating over $800,000 in the previous year. The report included twenty-five columns of data, from average selling price to advertising costs. By October 2019, Amazon had launched three similar trunk organizers under its Amazon Basics brand, undercutting Fortem's price. Beyond copying products, Amazon also used its control over search results to advantage its own brands. For years, Amazon's search team (called A9) had resisted pressure to prioritize Amazon's private label products in search results. However, after a restructuring in 2018 placed the search team under retail executive Doug Herrington, the algorithm was modified to include profitability as a factor in search rankings, giving Amazon's higher-margin private label products better placement. This change represented a significant departure from Amazon's stated principle of customer obsession, prioritizing Amazon's profits over showing customers the most relevant products. Amazon's data advantage extended far beyond retail. Through AWS, Amazon gained insights into the computing needs and technological innovations of thousands of companies, including many startups developing cutting-edge products. Through its Alexa Voice Service, which allowed other device makers to integrate with Amazon's voice assistant, Amazon gained early access to competitors' product plans and prototypes. This created what one venture capitalist called "a wolf in wolf's clothing" – a platform with the capability to monitor, copy, and displace the very partners that relied on its services. The combination of data exploitation, product copying, and search manipulation created a nearly impossible environment for sellers and competitors. As Amazon's former general counsel David Zapolsky reportedly told colleagues, "We have the data and they don't." This data advantage, coupled with Amazon's willingness to use it aggressively against partners and competitors alike, would eventually become a central focus of antitrust investigations as regulators began questioning whether Amazon had crossed the line from vigorous competition to anticompetitive behavior.

Chapter 4: Digital Expansion: AWS, Alexa, and Strategic Acquisitions (2006-2018)

While Amazon was revolutionizing retail through its marketplace and private label strategies, it was simultaneously expanding into entirely new industries through a combination of internal innovation and strategic acquisitions. This diversification began in 2006 with the launch of Amazon Web Services (AWS), which would eventually become the company's most profitable division. AWS transformed how businesses accessed computing power, allowing companies to rent server capacity rather than building their own infrastructure. This "cloud computing" model proved revolutionary, and by 2023, AWS had become the largest cloud provider in the world, serving millions of companies – including many of Amazon's direct competitors. In 2007, Amazon made two significant moves that signaled its ambitions beyond traditional e-commerce: launching Amazon Fresh, its entry into groceries, and introducing the Kindle e-reader. The Kindle revolutionized reading much as Apple's iPod had transformed music consumption, allowing customers to carry hundreds of books on one small device. It also gave Amazon a branded device in customers' homes and further entrenched it in the daily habit of reading. This device strategy expanded dramatically in the following years. In 2014, Amazon launched the Fire TV streaming device and introduced the Echo smart speaker with its voice-activated assistant Alexa. By 2022, there would be more than 87 million Echo devices in US homes, serving as beacons that delivered valuable data back to Amazon while connecting various parts of its growing empire. Amazon's expansion strategy followed a consistent pattern: identify daily habits people formed, such as watching videos or listening to music, and find ways to insert Amazon into those activities. As Roy Price, who headed Amazon Studios until 2017, recalled: "Jeff was talking about making Amazon a 'daily habit' at a bunch of meetings. When you think about music and video, that puts you in touch with the brand on a daily basis... The change for Amazon was moving from a retailer that you went to when you needed to buy something to a service provider who was just part of your lifestyle." This approach led to the launch of Amazon Studios in 2010 to create original movies and television content, and the acquisition of audiobook company Audible in 2008. The company's acquisition strategy revealed both its ambitions and its methods. In 2017, Amazon shocked the business world by acquiring Whole Foods for $13.7 billion, instantly making it a major player in the grocery industry. The announcement sent shockwaves through the market, erasing nearly $22 billion in market value from American grocery chains in a single day. This move into physical retail demonstrated Amazon's willingness to enter any industry it saw as strategic, regardless of how different it might be from its core business. Smaller acquisitions like Ring (smart doorbells), PillPack (online pharmacy), and Zoox (autonomous vehicles) further expanded Amazon's reach into home security, healthcare, and transportation. What made Amazon's expansion unique was how its various businesses reinforced each other. Prime members spent more on Amazon.com. Sellers joined Amazon's Fulfillment by Amazon shipping network to reach Prime customers quickly. AWS profits funded investments in new ventures. Each piece of Amazon's growing empire fed into a larger flywheel, creating efficiencies and making the company increasingly indispensable to shoppers, sellers, and even competitors. By 2018, Amazon had created a conglomerate unlike any other – one where the sum was greater than its parts, with each business providing leverage for the others. This integrated approach created unprecedented challenges for regulators and competitors alike. Traditional antitrust frameworks struggled to address a company that operated across so many industries simultaneously, often at different points in the value chain. Competitors found themselves facing a rival that could leverage data, customers, and profits from one business to gain advantages in another. As Amazon's digital tentacles extended into more aspects of daily life, the question increasingly became not whether it was a monopoly in the traditional sense, but whether its unique form of power required new approaches to regulation and competition policy.

Chapter 5: Regulatory Challenges: Political Backlash and Antitrust Scrutiny (2017-2021)

By 2017, Amazon's extraordinary growth and expanding power across multiple industries had begun to attract serious regulatory scrutiny. The company that had once operated in near-total secrecy found itself increasingly in the crosshairs of lawmakers, regulators, and critics who questioned whether its dominance had crossed the line into monopolistic behavior. A pivotal moment came in January 2017 when Lina Khan, then a 27-year-old law school student, published "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox" in the Yale Law Journal. Khan argued that Amazon had "marched toward monopoly" and that current antitrust frameworks – focused primarily on consumer prices – were inadequate to address the company's market power. Her paper went viral, influencing politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren and sparking a broader conversation about monopoly power in the digital age. Amazon faced additional challenges with the election of Donald Trump in November 2016. During his campaign, Trump had called Amazon a monopoly and criticized Bezos's ownership of the Washington Post. Amazon's public policy team, led by Jay Carney (a former Obama press secretary hired in 2015), had been preparing for a Hillary Clinton administration and was caught flat-footed by Trump's victory. The company quickly pivoted its strategy, focusing on job creation and economic investment – areas where it could find common ground with the Trump administration. Amazon dramatically increased its lobbying presence in Washington, growing from spending just $2.5 million on lobbyists in 2012 to a record $16.1 million by 2019, making it the second-largest corporate lobbying spender in the country. Inside Amazon, the mounting regulatory pressure created a siege mentality. General counsel David Zapolsky maintained a list of banned words that employees were instructed not to use in emails or documents, including terms like "market share," "platform," and "ecosystem" that might signal anticompetitive practices. Sensitive discussions about antitrust and mergers increasingly took place over encrypted messaging apps like Signal rather than email. Employees were instructed to mark communications as "privileged and confidential" even when not seeking legal advice, to prevent them from being discovered by regulators. In July 2020, Bezos appeared before Congress alongside other tech CEOs in a historic antitrust hearing. It marked the first time Bezos had testified before Congress, reflecting the growing seriousness of the regulatory threat. During five hours of questioning, lawmakers grilled Bezos on Amazon's treatment of sellers, its use of data to develop competing products, and its dominance in e-commerce. The hearing was particularly challenging for Amazon after the Wall Street Journal had published an explosive report revealing that Amazon routinely used individual seller data to develop competing products, directly contradicting testimony given by Amazon lawyer Nate Sutton in a previous congressional hearing. The regulatory scrutiny intensified further when President Biden appointed Khan as chair of the FTC in June 2021, making her the youngest chair in the agency's history at just 32 years old. Amazon immediately recognized the threat Khan posed and filed a petition seeking her recusal from any Amazon-related cases, arguing that her previous criticisms of the company indicated bias. This aggressive response highlighted Amazon's confrontational approach to regulatory scrutiny – a strategy that would ultimately prove counterproductive as it reinforced perceptions that the company was unwilling to address legitimate concerns about its market power. By 2021, Amazon faced a regulatory landscape fundamentally different from the one it had navigated during its rise to dominance. The bipartisan consensus that had allowed tech giants to grow with minimal oversight was fracturing, with politicians across the political spectrum questioning whether companies like Amazon had become too powerful. This shift represented perhaps the most significant challenge to Amazon's business model since its founding – one that would require more than technological innovation or business acumen to overcome.

Chapter 6: Pandemic Acceleration: Crisis as Opportunity (2020-2022)

When the COVID-19 pandemic struck in early 2020, it created unprecedented disruption across the global economy. Businesses shuttered, unemployment soared, and consumer behavior changed dramatically as lockdowns forced people to stay home. While most companies struggled to survive this upheaval, Amazon found itself uniquely positioned to thrive. The pandemic accelerated existing trends toward online shopping and digital services, playing directly to Amazon's strengths across its diverse business lines. As traditional retailers were forced to close their physical locations, Amazon became an essential lifeline for millions of Americans needing everything from groceries to cleaning supplies. The company's logistics network, built over decades, proved invaluable during this crisis. In March 2020, demand surged so dramatically that Amazon had to prioritize "essential" items like cleaning supplies and pantry goods, temporarily restricting shipments of non-essential products to its warehouses. Even President Trump turned to Amazon when critical supplies couldn't be found elsewhere, with the White House ordering nearly $13 million in thermometers from the company. The financial impact was staggering. While the S&P 500 index fell by 4% during the first half of 2020, Amazon's stock price rose nearly 50%, reaching a record market capitalization of $1.5 trillion. Bezos personally added more than $74 billion to his net worth in the early months of the pandemic. Meanwhile, approximately 200,000 more businesses than normal closed during the first year of the pandemic. Storied retailers like Neiman Marcus, JCPenney, and Lord & Taylor filed for bankruptcy, unable to weather the storm. For mall operators like PREIT, which had already been struggling with the shift to online shopping, the pandemic delivered a fatal blow. On November 1, 2020, after years of declining fortunes accelerated by the pandemic, PREIT filed for bankruptcy protection. While Amazon's business boomed, its warehouse workers faced dangerous conditions on the frontlines. The company hired hundreds of thousands of new employees to meet surging demand, drawing from a desperate workforce that included laid-off professionals, small business owners, and others whose livelihoods had been destroyed by the pandemic. Fifty-year-old Ginette Zuras-Hummel, who had to temporarily close her medical billing business, took a job picking orders at Whole Foods. "They made a fortune during that time. They cornered the world," she observed. Amazon's leadership recognized the pandemic as an opportunity to reshape its public image. The company's role in delivering essential goods and creating jobs during an economic crisis could help neutralize criticism about its size and power. However, Amazon's attempts to capitalize on the crisis were complicated by controversies over its treatment of workers. When Chris Smalls, a warehouse worker in Staten Island, organized a walkout to protest unsafe conditions, he was promptly fired. In an executive meeting attended by Bezos, Amazon's general counsel David Zapolsky suggested discrediting Smalls, describing him as "not smart, or articulate." When these comments leaked to the press, they were widely condemned as racist and classist, undermining Amazon's efforts to position itself as a corporate hero during the pandemic. The pandemic also revealed how Amazon could use crisis conditions to advantage its own products over competitors. When the company prioritized "essential" items during the early lockdowns, Amazon's own devices like Fire TV and Ring doorbells continued shipping normally, while competing products from companies like Roku and Arlo faced significant delays. Amazon later claimed this was an "unintentional" mistake, but it gave the company's devices a crucial advantage during a period of peak demand. As the world struggled through unprecedented disruption, Amazon emerged stronger than ever, with the pandemic having accelerated the digital transformation of the economy by years, cementing Amazon's central role in commerce, cloud computing, and entertainment.

Chapter 7: The Monopoly Question: FTC Lawsuit and Future Implications (2021-2023)

The regulatory pressure on Amazon culminated on September 26, 2023, when the Federal Trade Commission, joined by seventeen state attorneys general, filed a landmark antitrust lawsuit against the company. This action represented the most significant legal challenge Amazon had ever faced, with the potential to fundamentally reshape its business model. The complaint alleged that Amazon maintained an illegal monopoly through two key practices: forcing sellers to use its fulfillment service to qualify for Prime, and punishing sellers who offered lower prices on competing websites. The FTC argued that these tactics had inflated prices across the entire e-commerce ecosystem, harming both consumers and competition. The lawsuit revealed previously unknown details about Amazon's business practices, including the existence of "Project Nessie," a secret algorithm Amazon used to raise prices and generate over $1 billion in additional profits. According to the FTC's complaint, this algorithm would identify popular products where Amazon had a price advantage over competitors, then raise prices on those items. If competitors matched Amazon's higher prices, the algorithm would maintain the inflated price; if competitors kept prices lower, Amazon would eventually reduce its price. This sophisticated mechanism allowed Amazon to lead prices upward across the entire market while maintaining its reputation for low prices – a practice the FTC characterized as "algorithmic collusion." Amazon's response to the lawsuit was defiant, with general counsel David Zapolsky stating that the case was "wrong on the facts and the law." The company argued that it operated in a highly competitive retail market and that its practices benefited consumers through lower prices and faster delivery. However, internally, Amazon had already begun making changes to potentially blunt the impact of regulatory action, including scaling back its private label business and reintroducing a program allowing sellers to use non-Amazon logistics services while maintaining Prime eligibility. The lawsuit came amid a broader shift in how Amazon was perceived by both the public and policymakers. The company that had once been celebrated for its innovation and customer focus was increasingly viewed with suspicion. Even some of Amazon's own employees and early leaders had become critics. Tim Bray, a distinguished engineer who joined AWS in 2014, eventually left the company and publicly called for Amazon to be broken up. "It's highly injurious to a free market when you have parties who are using fountains of profits from one area of business to invade other areas of business," he said. Paul Davis, Amazon's second employee, similarly concluded that the company had become too powerful and should be divided into separate entities. The FTC's lawsuit represented not just a challenge to Amazon's specific business practices, but a fundamental rethinking of antitrust enforcement in the digital age. Under Chair Lina Khan, the FTC had moved away from the consumer welfare standard that had dominated antitrust thinking since the 1980s, which primarily focused on whether business practices led to higher consumer prices. Instead, the agency was adopting a more holistic approach that considered effects on competition, innovation, and market structure. This shift in perspective meant that even if Amazon could argue its practices benefited consumers through lower prices or faster delivery, it could still be found to have violated antitrust laws if those practices harmed competition or entrenched its dominance. The outcome of this legal battle would have implications far beyond Amazon itself. It would help define the boundaries of acceptable business conduct for digital platforms, potentially establishing new precedents for how companies could leverage data, integrate across markets, and treat partners and competitors. For Amazon, the stakes could not be higher – a loss could potentially force structural changes to its business model, such as separating its marketplace from its retail operations or limiting its ability to use seller data. For the broader tech industry, the case represented a watershed moment in the relationship between digital platforms and government regulation, with the potential to reshape the landscape for decades to come.

Summary

Amazon's rise from an online bookstore to a trillion-dollar conglomerate represents one of the most remarkable business transformations in history, but it also reveals a fundamental tension in American capitalism. Throughout its evolution, Amazon has consistently prioritized growth over profits, leveraging its dominance in one market to enter and conquer adjacent ones. The company's relentless focus on customer experience created a powerful flywheel effect, but this same mechanism allowed it to accumulate unprecedented market power that ultimately harmed competition, workers, and even the consumers it claimed to serve. The central paradox is that the very practices that made Amazon successful – aggressive pricing, rapid expansion, and vertical integration – eventually created a monopolistic entity that stifled innovation and extracted increasing value from both partners and customers. The Amazon story offers crucial lessons about the relationship between business, technology, and regulation in the digital age. First, antitrust frameworks must evolve to address the unique dynamics of platform businesses that can leverage data and network effects to entrench their dominance. Second, the pursuit of consumer convenience and low prices, while beneficial in the short term, can mask long-term harms to market competition and economic vitality. Finally, the concentration of power in a few technology giants threatens not just economic competition but democratic values. As society grapples with these challenges, the outcome of regulatory efforts against Amazon will likely define the boundaries between beneficial innovation and harmful monopolization for generations to come. The question is no longer whether Amazon should face constraints, but rather what form those constraints should take to preserve the benefits of digital commerce while preventing the abuses that inevitably arise from unchecked power.

About Author

Loading...

Dana Mattioli

Read more