The Symposium

The Symposium Plot Summary

Introduction

"What is love?" This seemingly simple question has puzzled philosophers, poets, and ordinary people throughout human history. In ancient Athens, on a night of celebration at the house of the tragic poet Agathon, a group of distinguished men gathered not just to drink wine, but to explore this eternal question. Each would offer his own vision of Eros, the god of love, culminating in Socrates' revolutionary account of love as the great intermediary between the human and divine worlds. Plato's philosophical exploration takes us on a journey from conventional views of love to a transcendent vision where Eros becomes the driving force behind humanity's quest for wisdom and immortality. Through the dramatic setting of a drinking party, we witness how love transforms from mere physical attraction to a spiritual ascent toward the Form of Beauty itself. This ascent represents not just a theory of love but a complete philosophical method and way of life. The dialogues reveal how Eros functions as both desire for what we lack and the means by which we might transcend our limitations. In this masterpiece of philosophical literature, we discover not just what love is, but how it shapes our very understanding of reality and guides our path toward the ultimate good.

Chapter 1: The Symposium's Setting: A Celebration at Agathon's House

The narrative begins with Apollodorus recounting a story he heard from Aristodemus about a dinner party held at the house of the tragic poet Agathon. This gathering took place years earlier, the day after Agathon had won first prize at a dramatic competition. The layered storytelling—with Apollodorus telling what Aristodemus told him—creates a sense of mythic importance around the events that unfolded that night. As Aristodemus walks to the party with Socrates, the philosopher suddenly falls behind, lost in thought. This momentary detachment foreshadows Socrates' intellectual distance from the other guests. When Aristodemus arrives alone, Agathon warmly welcomes him but inquires about Socrates' whereabouts. A slave reports finding Socrates standing motionless in a neighbor's doorway, deep in contemplation. The guests decide not to disturb him, knowing this is one of his habits. Socrates eventually arrives, taking his place beside Agathon. After dinner, the men decide against heavy drinking, as many are still recovering from the previous night's festivities. Instead, they dismiss the flute-girl and choose to entertain themselves with conversation. Eryximachus, a physician, proposes that each man should deliver a speech in praise of Love (Eros), noting that poets and others have neglected this important deity. The suggestion meets with unanimous approval, and they agree to proceed around the room from left to right, beginning with Phaedrus. This setting—a symposium or drinking party among educated Athenian men—provides the perfect backdrop for philosophical discourse. The convivial atmosphere encourages open exchange, while the competitive element of speechmaking pushes each participant to surpass what came before. Through this dramatic framework, Plato transforms what might have been abstract philosophical arguments into living conversation, allowing readers to witness the development of ideas through the interaction of distinct personalities, each representing different perspectives on love.

Chapter 2: Competing Visions of Love: From Phaedrus to Agathon

The series of speeches begins with Phaedrus, who praises Love as one of the oldest gods, responsible for inspiring virtue and noble deeds. He argues that lovers are motivated to behave honorably to avoid shame in their beloved's eyes. Using examples like Alcestis, who died for her husband, and Achilles, who avenged Patroclus despite knowing it would cost his life, Phaedrus portrays love as the source of the greatest self-sacrifice and courage. For him, love inspires humans to transcend their limitations and achieve their finest moments. Pausanias follows with a more nuanced view, distinguishing between two types of love: Common Love (associated with Pandemic Aphrodite) and Heavenly Love (associated with Uranian Aphrodite). Common Love is indiscriminate, focused merely on physical pleasure and the body. Heavenly Love, by contrast, is directed toward the mind and character, seeking to improve the beloved intellectually and morally. Pausanias argues that only relationships guided by this higher form of love are truly valuable and praiseworthy. After Pausanias, the physician Eryximachus extends the concept of love beyond human relationships to encompass all of nature. He views love as a universal force that, when properly balanced, creates harmony in medicine, music, astronomy, and religion. For him, the physician's art lies in understanding how to promote good love and restrain harmful love in the body, just as other arts seek harmony in their respective domains. Aristophanes then offers a mythical account, explaining that humans were originally whole creatures with four arms, four legs, and two faces. When these beings threatened the gods, Zeus split them in half, leaving each person forever searching for their other half. This origin story explains why we experience love as a profound longing for completion. Aristophanes sees love as the desire to find our matching half and heal the wound of our divided nature. Finally, the young poet Agathon delivers an eloquent but superficial speech praising Love as the youngest, most beautiful, and most virtuous of gods. He claims that Love is delicate, fluid, and sensitive, dwelling only in the softest parts of the softest beings. His speech is filled with poetic flourishes but lacks philosophical depth. When he finishes, everyone applauds his beautiful words, setting the stage for Socrates to deliver a more profound analysis that will challenge these conventional views.

Chapter 3: Socrates and Diotima: Love as Spiritual Intermediary

When Socrates' turn arrives, he takes a dramatically different approach. Rather than directly praising Love, he questions Agathon's assumptions through his characteristic method of dialogue. He leads Agathon to admit that love implies desire, and desire implies lack—we desire what we don't possess. Since Love desires beauty and goodness, Love cannot itself be completely beautiful or good. This revelation confounds Agathon and overturns the previous speeches. Instead of offering his own eulogy, Socrates recounts a conversation he once had with Diotima, a wise priestess from Mantinea. Through her teachings, he presents a revolutionary understanding of Love not as a god but as a "spirit" (daimon)—a being between mortal and immortal, between wisdom and ignorance. Love is neither beautiful nor ugly, neither good nor bad, but something in between that strives toward beauty and goodness. Diotima describes Love's mythical origins as the child of Resource (Poros) and Poverty (Penia), conceived during a celebration for Aphrodite's birth. This mixed parentage explains Love's nature: always in need like his mother, yet resourceful like his father. Love is perpetually in a state of becoming rather than being, constantly pursuing what he lacks. As an intermediary between the human and divine, Love enables communication between these realms. The priestess then outlines the famous "ladder of love"—a spiritual ascent beginning with attraction to a single beautiful body, progressing to appreciation of all beautiful bodies, then to beautiful souls, institutions, knowledge, and finally to the Form of Beauty itself. This highest vision reveals beauty that is eternal, unchanging, and absolute—"beauty absolute, separate, simple, and everlasting." The true lover ascends from particular instances of beauty to universal Beauty, from the physical to the metaphysical. This ascent represents not just a theory of love but the philosophical journey itself. Love becomes the driving force behind the pursuit of wisdom, explaining why Socrates calls himself an expert in "the things of love." Through Diotima's teachings, love is revealed as the fundamental energy that propels humans toward the transcendent, making philosophy itself an erotic activity—a passionate quest for what we lack but somehow divine.

Chapter 4: Alcibiades' Arrival: The Portrait of Socrates as Lover

Just as Socrates concludes his profound account of love's spiritual ascent, the symposium is dramatically interrupted by the arrival of Alcibiades, the handsome and charismatic Athenian general. Bursting in drunk, crowned with violets and ribbons, Alcibiades brings an unexpected dimension to the dialogue by offering not a theoretical speech about love but a personal testimony of his experience with Socrates himself. Alcibiades confesses that he had once attempted to seduce Socrates, believing that through physical intimacy he could gain access to the philosopher's wisdom. He recounts in detail how he engineered private moments with Socrates, eventually lying beside him under the same cloak—only to discover that Socrates remained completely indifferent to his physical beauty. Despite Alcibiades' renowned attractiveness, which captivated many Athenians, Socrates resisted his advances with extraordinary self-control. Beyond this failed seduction, Alcibiades provides a complex portrait of Socrates as a man of paradoxes. He compares him to Silenus statues that appear crude on the outside but contain beautiful figurines of gods within. Similarly, Socrates appears common and even satirical in his external appearance and manner, but contains divine wisdom within. Alcibiades describes Socrates' mesmerizing speech that affects listeners like the music of the satyr Marsyas, capable of possessing and transforming those who hear it. Alcibiades also testifies to Socrates' remarkable physical endurance and courage in battle. During military campaigns at Potidaea and Delium, Socrates demonstrated superhuman resistance to cold, hunger, and fear. Once, he stood motionless for an entire day and night, deep in thought. Another time, he saved Alcibiades' life in battle, displaying courage that should have earned him military honors. These examples reveal Socrates' extraordinary self-mastery over both bodily desires and physical hardships. Through Alcibiades' speech, we see Socrates embodying the philosophical eros he described—not through pursuing physical beauty but by steadfastly orienting himself toward wisdom and virtue. The irony is profound: while the others gave speeches about love, Socrates is revealed as the true lover, one whose erotic energy is directed not toward beautiful bodies but toward beautiful souls and ultimately toward wisdom itself. His relationship with Alcibiades demonstrates the tension between common love and heavenly love that Pausanias described earlier.

Chapter 5: The Cave and The Divided Line: Philosophical Context

To fully understand the vision of love presented in the Symposium, we must consider its place within Plato's broader philosophical framework, particularly his famous allegories of the Cave and the Divided Line. These powerful metaphors, found in Plato's Republic, provide essential context for comprehending how love functions as a pathway toward ultimate reality. The allegory of the Cave describes prisoners chained in an underground chamber, able to see only shadows projected on a wall. These shadows, cast by artificial objects carried behind them, constitute their entire reality. If freed and forced to turn toward the fire casting these shadows, a prisoner would be pained and confused. Similarly, if dragged out of the cave into sunlight, he would be blinded and distressed. Only gradually could he adjust—first seeing reflections in water, then objects themselves, then the night sky, and finally the sun itself, the source of all visibility and life. This ascent from the cave parallels the lover's journey in the Symposium. Just as the prisoner moves from shadows to real objects to the sun, the lover progresses from particular beautiful bodies to the Form of Beauty itself. In both cases, there is a gradual ascent from appearances to reality, from the many to the one, from the changing to the unchanging. Love provides the motivating force—the "drag" that pulls the soul upward toward the Forms. The Divided Line complements this picture by distinguishing four levels of cognition corresponding to four levels of reality. At the lowest level is eikasia (imagination), dealing with images and reflections; next is pistis (belief), concerning physical objects; then dianoia (thought), involving mathematical reasoning; and finally noesis (understanding), grasping the Forms through dialectic. Each level represents a clearer apprehension of reality than the one below. In the Symposium's ladder of love, we see a similar progression through levels of understanding. The lover begins with images (beautiful bodies), advances to physical realities (beautiful souls and practices), then to systems of knowledge, and finally to the Form of Beauty itself. At each stage, the soul's vision becomes clearer and more unified, just as the prisoner's sight adjusts to increasingly brilliant illumination. These allegories reveal that love, in Plato's vision, is not merely a personal or psychological phenomenon but an epistemological one—a way of knowing that leads from multiplicity toward unity, from becoming toward being. Eros becomes the energy that propels the soul along the divided line and out of the cave of ignorance toward the sunlight of truth.

Chapter 6: Eros as the Path to Understanding the Form of Good

The culmination of Plato's vision of love reveals Eros as the essential force that drives humans toward understanding the Form of Good—the supreme reality that gives meaning and value to everything else. In the Republic, Socrates describes the Good as "beyond being," superior even to knowledge and truth, just as the sun transcends the visibility it makes possible. Similarly, in the Symposium, the Form of Beauty that crowns the lover's ascent represents the highest accessible manifestation of the Good. Through Diotima's teachings, we learn that love is fundamentally a desire for "possession of the good forever"—a kind of immortality through continuity. This explains why humans naturally seek to reproduce, whether physically through children or spiritually through fame, virtue, or knowledge. The philosopher's pregnancy is in the mind rather than the body, giving birth to ideas and virtues that more closely approach immortality than physical offspring. This spiritual procreation happens only in the presence of beauty, which serves as the necessary condition for creative generation. As the lover ascends the ladder of love, his vision progressively widens. Beginning with attachment to particular instances of beauty, he gradually recognizes the common beauty in all bodies, then in souls, institutions, and knowledge. Each step involves a movement from the specific to the general, from the temporary to the permanent. The final vision of Beauty itself represents a qualitative leap—suddenly ("suddenly" is a key word in Diotima's account) the lover beholds Beauty that is "eternal, neither coming into being nor perishing, neither increasing nor decreasing." This sudden vision parallels the prisoner's final glimpse of the sun in the Cave allegory. In both cases, what is revealed is not just another object of knowledge but the very condition that makes knowledge possible. The Form of Good, like the sun, is the source of being and intelligibility for everything else. Beauty, as its most accessible manifestation, draws the soul toward this ultimate reality through love's magnetic pull. Crucially, the lover who achieves this vision does not remain in solitary contemplation. Having seen true Beauty, he is able to give birth not to "images of virtue" but to "true virtue," becoming a genuine benefit to society. Just as the freed prisoner in the Cave must return to help his fellows, the philosopher-lover brings his vision back into the realm of human affairs. This explains why Socrates—the embodiment of philosophical Eros—remains engaged with his fellow citizens rather than withdrawing into isolated contemplation. Thus, Eros serves as the dynamic principle that connects the human to the divine, the particular to the universal, the temporal to the eternal. It is both the recognition of our incompleteness and the energy that propels us toward completion. In Plato's vision, love is ultimately not possession but creative generation in response to beauty—a productive force that leads us, step by step, toward the supreme reality that gives meaning to existence itself.

Summary

Plato's exploration of love represents one of philosophy's most profound attempts to understand the force that draws humans beyond themselves toward transcendent reality. Through the speeches at Agathon's banquet, particularly Socrates' recounting of Diotima's teachings, we discover love not merely as romantic attachment but as the fundamental energy driving all human aspiration. This revolutionary vision transforms Eros from a god to be praised into a philosophical method to be practiced—a ladder of ascent from the physical world of becoming to the eternal realm of being. The enduring power of this vision lies in its integration of the physical and metaphysical dimensions of human experience. Unlike philosophies that reject sensual experience, Plato's account begins with the body's natural response to physical beauty but shows how this initial attraction can be educated and elevated. The lover doesn't abandon physical beauty but learns to see it as the first rung on a ladder leading to higher forms of beauty. Through this process, love becomes the great connector between the visible and invisible worlds, between the human and divine. It explains why philosophy itself is an erotic activity—a passionate pursuit driven by awareness of our incompleteness yet animated by glimpses of completion. In the end, Plato offers not just a theory about love but a comprehensive account of human nature and its potential for transcendence, making this dialogue as relevant to our contemporary search for meaning as it was in ancient Athens.

About Author

Loading...

Plato

Plato (Greek: Πλάτων), born Aristocles (c. 427 – 348 BC), was an ancient Greek philosopher of the Classical period who is considered a foundational thinker in Western philosophy and an innovator of the written dialogue and dialectic forms. He raised problems for what became all the major areas of both theoretical philosophy and practical philosophy, and was the founder of the Platonic Academy, a philosophical school in Athens where Plato taught the doctrines that would later become known as Platonism.Plato's most famous contribution is the theory of forms (or ideas), which has been interpreted as advancing a solution to what is now known as the problem of universals. He was decisively influenced by the pre-Socratic thinkers Pythagoras, Heraclitus, and Parmenides, although much of what is known about them is derived from Plato himself.Along with his teacher Socrates, and Aristotle, his student, Plato is a central figure in the history of philosophy. Plato's entire body of work is believed to have survived intact for over 2,400 years—unlike that of nearly all of his contemporaries. Although their popularity has fluctuated, they have consistently been read and studied through the ages. Through Neoplatonism, he also greatly influenced both Christian and Islamic philosophy. In modern times, Alfred North Whitehead famously said: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato."

Read more

Related Books by Plato

Loading...

The Republic

Plato

One of the most important philosophical texts ever written

★★★★½4.5