The Tale of the Dueling Neurosurgeons

The Tale of the Dueling Neurosurgeons Plot Summary

Introduction

Throughout history, our understanding of the human brain has often advanced not through careful planning, but through accidents, injuries, and unexpected cases that nature provided. When King Henri II of France was struck in the head during a jousting tournament in 1559, no one could have predicted that his tragic death would launch the modern study of neuroscience. Similarly, when railroad foreman Phineas Gage survived an iron rod shooting through his skull in 1848, his personality changes revealed crucial insights about the frontal lobes that no planned experiment could have ethically discovered. These "experiments of nature" have repeatedly transformed our understanding of the brain's structure and function. From presidential assassinations that revealed chemical imbalances in the brain to tribal funeral practices that led to the discovery of prion diseases, history's accidents have illuminated the mysterious three-pound universe inside our skulls. This exploration of brain science through historical accidents offers a unique perspective for anyone fascinated by neuroscience, medical history, or the remarkable resilience of the human mind. By examining how chance events shaped our knowledge, we gain a deeper appreciation for both the fragility and the adaptability of the most complex object in the known universe.

Chapter 1: Royal Tragedy: Henri II's Injury and the Birth of Neuroscience (1559)

In the summer of 1559, a fateful jousting tournament in Paris would unexpectedly launch the modern study of the brain. King Henri II of France, celebrating recent peace treaties through royal marriages, insisted on participating in the festivities despite warnings from his wife's astrologers. During his third joust against Gabriel Montgomery, disaster struck when Montgomery's lance shattered upon impact, sending a wooden splinter through the king's golden helmet and into his eye. More critically, the impact caused a severe contrecoup injury—the brain damage occurred on the opposite side from the blow as Henri's brain slammed against the back of his skull. The king's suffering brought together two revolutionary medical minds of the Renaissance: Ambroise Paré and Andreas Vesalius. Paré had transformed battlefield surgery by abandoning the practice of cauterizing wounds with boiling oil, while Vesalius had revolutionized anatomy through his groundbreaking work "De Humani Corporis Fabrica," which insisted on direct observation rather than relying on ancient texts. While most physicians of the era believed skull fractures were necessary for brain injuries to be fatal, both men predicted Henri would die from brain trauma despite his intact skull—a radical departure from medical orthodoxy. For eleven days, Henri drifted between consciousness and unconsciousness, exhibiting symptoms that would later prove crucial to neuroscience: seizures affecting only half his body (suggesting the brain controls opposite sides independently), vision problems (indicating the visual cortex's location), and progressive headaches from brain swelling. When Henri finally succumbed, Vesalius and Paré performed a historic autopsy, finding pools of blackened fluid and deteriorated brain tissue at the back of his brain—exactly where they had predicted the contrecoup damage would be. The significance of this royal tragedy extended far beyond the French court. By focusing on brain damage rather than skull fractures, Paré and Vesalius established a new approach to neuroscience—one based on observation and experimentation rather than ancient dogma. Their work demonstrated that trauma to the brain alone could be deadly, even without visible external damage, and began the vital practice of correlating specific brain injuries with specific symptoms. This approach would eventually lead scientists to understand the brain at increasingly detailed levels, from gross anatomy to cellular structure to the chemical signals that relay information between neurons. Henri's death also had profound historical consequences, triggering decades of religious warfare in France. His frail son François II briefly took the throne before dying, leaving Catherine de Medici to rule as regent during a period of escalating religious tensions that culminated in the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 1572. Meanwhile, the scientific principles established through Henri's case would guide brain research for centuries to come, demonstrating how a single tragic accident could simultaneously alter political history and launch a scientific revolution in our understanding of the mind.

Chapter 2: Presidential Assassins: Revealing Brain Chemistry (1880s)

The late 19th century brought two presidential assassinations that would dramatically advance our understanding of brain chemistry. In 1881, Charles Guiteau shot President James Garfield at a Washington train station. Guiteau, a delusional office-seeker who believed God had commanded him to kill the president, survived to stand trial despite public outrage. During his trial, neurologist Edward Charles Spitzka testified that Guiteau was insane, pointing to neurological symptoms like his lopsided smile and uncontrollable tongue movements—physical manifestations of disordered brain function. Twenty years later, in 1901, Leon Czolgosz assassinated President William McKinley at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo. Unlike the religiously deluded Guiteau, Czolgosz was a self-proclaimed anarchist who had experienced a mysterious mental breakdown three years earlier. After McKinley's death, Czolgosz was swiftly executed by electric chair, and his brain was autopsied by Edward Anthony Spitzka, son of the neurologist who had testified in Guiteau's case—creating a remarkable historical connection between these two presidential assassinations. The autopsies of both assassins' brains revealed crucial insights about brain chemistry. Guiteau's brain showed extensive microscopic damage—thinned gray matter, perished neurons leaving tiny holes, and yellow-brown residue from dying blood vessels. In contrast, Czolgosz's brain appeared normal on gross examination, leading the younger Spitzka to make a remarkable observation: "Some forms of psychoses have no ascertainable anatomical basis... These psychoses depend rather upon circulatory and chemical disturbances." This intuition about chemical imbalances foreshadowed major discoveries in neuroscience decades before the technology existed to confirm them. During this same period, a fierce scientific debate was raging about how neurons communicate. Santiago Ramón y Cajal had recently proposed the "neuron doctrine," demonstrating that neurons were discrete cells separated by tiny gaps called synapses. But how did signals cross these gaps? Two camps emerged: the "sparks" who believed in electrical transmission, and the "soups" who championed chemical messengers. The debate continued until 1920 when Otto Loewi, in an experiment first revealed to him in a dream, demonstrated that nerves release chemicals that affect heart rate. By transferring fluid from one frog heart to another, he showed that chemical messengers, not just electricity, transmitted nerve signals. In retrospect, both assassins likely suffered from chemical imbalances in their brains. Guiteau had schizophrenia, which disrupts neurotransmitters and skews their balance, forcing neurons to fire when they shouldn't and preventing them from firing when they should. Czolgosz may have experienced how chronic stress and isolation can deplete neurotransmitters and alter brain function. Their tragic cases helped scientists understand that everything in the brain is interconnected—from the chemicals deep in our reptile brain to our most complex thoughts and behaviors—and that mental illness often has biological underpinnings rather than simply being a failure of character or willpower.

Chapter 3: Blind Explorer: Holman's Journey and Neural Plasticity

In the early 1800s, a remarkable naval officer named James Holman became known as "the blind traveler," covering some 250,000 miles across five continents at a time when global travel was perilous even for the sighted. What made his accomplishment extraordinary was that Holman had lost his sight completely at age twenty-five due to a mysterious illness that damaged his optic nerves. Despite this profound disability, Holman climbed Mount Vesuvius during an eruption, mapped parts of the Australian Outback, negotiated with headhunters, and authored bestselling travel books about his adventures. Holman's secret weapon was echolocation—the same sense that bats use to navigate. By tapping his metal-tipped cane on the ground and listening to how the echoes bounced off nearby objects, he could determine the layout of his surroundings with remarkable precision. The echoes revealed details about an object's size, shape, and texture, allowing him to navigate everything from Vatican art galleries to dense forests. This sensory capacity took years of determined practice to master, but once perfected, it became Holman's primary means of "seeing" the world around him. What makes Holman's story scientifically significant is how it demonstrates the brain's remarkable plasticity—its ability to rewire itself and adapt to new circumstances. Modern brain scans of blind echolocators reveal something extraordinary: their visual cortex activates strongly while they're listening to clicks and processing echoes. This happens because vision neurons, which normally help us see things, are fundamentally concerned with helping us navigate space. When deprived of visual input, these neurons don't simply shut down—they get recruited for processing spatial information from other senses, particularly hearing. This neural repurposing extends beyond the blind. In the 1960s, neuroscientist Paul Bach-y-Rita developed "sensory substitution" devices that allowed blind people to "see" through their tongues by translating camera images into patterns of electrical stimulation. His work demonstrated that the brain cares more about the information it receives than which sensory channel delivers that information. As Bach-y-Rita famously said, "We don't see with the eyes. We see with the brain." Holman's extraordinary life challenges our understanding of perception and reveals that our brains construct our reality rather than simply recording it. His ability to "see" without eyes demonstrates that sensory experience is ultimately created by the brain, not the sensory organs themselves. This insight has profound implications for rehabilitation after sensory loss and for understanding consciousness itself. The blind explorer's journey through a world of darkness illuminates how the human brain can overcome seemingly insurmountable challenges through its remarkable capacity for reorganization and adaptation—a capacity we all possess, though few are forced to utilize it as completely as James Holman did.

Chapter 4: Laughing Disease: Kuru's Mystery and Prion Discovery

In the 1950s, a mysterious and fatal disease called kuru was decimating tribes in the eastern highlands of Papua New Guinea. Victims, predominantly women and children, would develop trembling, loss of balance, and most distinctively, uncontrollable, mirthless laughter before eventually losing the ability to walk, speak, or swallow. The disease killed approximately 200 people annually among a population of just 40,000—proportionally equivalent to 1.5 million U.S. deaths every year—making it one of the most devastating epidemics ever recorded relative to population size. American scientist D. Carleton Gajdusek, an intense and eccentric pediatrician with a passion for remote cultures, became obsessed with solving the kuru mystery. Tramping from village to village through treacherous mountain terrain, he collected tissue samples from victims and performed autopsies on their brains. His work revealed damage concentrated in the cerebellum, the brain's movement center, which explained the victims' loss of balance and coordination. But the underlying cause remained elusive—there was no inflammation or other typical signs of infection, only unusual protein "plaques" and a spongy appearance in the brain tissue. The breakthrough came when anthropologists discovered the link between kuru and the Fore tribe's funeral practices. As a sign of respect, women and children would consume the bodies of deceased relatives, including their brains, while men rarely participated in this ritual. Although this practice had been largely abandoned by the 1950s due to missionary influence, Gajdusek's experiments with chimpanzees proved that kuru could lie dormant for years before causing symptoms. In 1963, he injected brain tissue from kuru victims into chimps, and three years later, the animals developed identical symptoms—proving kuru was transmissible rather than genetic or environmental. But what exactly was causing kuru? The infectious agent proved remarkably resistant to heat, chemicals, radiation, and other methods that would destroy normal microbes. In the 1980s, neurologist Stanley Prusiner proposed a revolutionary theory: the disease was caused by prions—infectious proteins that could replicate without DNA or RNA. These prions were actually misfolded versions of normal brain proteins that could convert healthy proteins to their abnormal shape, creating a cascade of damage. This concept was so radical that Prusiner faced intense skepticism from the scientific community before eventually winning the Nobel Prize for his discovery. The kuru story transformed our understanding of neurodegenerative diseases. As cannibalism ceased, kuru gradually disappeared, confirming its transmission route. More importantly, the discovery of prions opened up new avenues for understanding other brain disorders like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and mad cow disease, all of which involve protein misfolding. This research, born from a rare disease in a remote corner of the world, fundamentally changed how we think about infections and brain degeneration, demonstrating how a single unusual case can revolutionize our understanding of how the brain works—and how it fails.

Chapter 5: War Wounds: Mapping the Brain Through Battlefield Injuries

The American Civil War, with its devastating new weaponry and unprecedented scale of casualties, became a grim laboratory for advancing neuroscience. The Minié bullet, a soft lead projectile that expanded upon impact and shredded tissue, shattered soldiers' limbs beyond repair, leading to tens of thousands of amputations. From this tragedy emerged crucial insights into how the brain maps and perceives the body, particularly through the phenomenon of phantom limbs—sensations that persist after a limb is removed. Dr. Silas Weir Mitchell, a contract military doctor who established a neurological research center called Turner's Lane Hospital in Philadelphia, became the pioneer in phantom limb research. Through careful observation of hundreds of amputees, Mitchell determined that 95% experienced ghost limbs—sensations of pain, itching, or movement in limbs that were no longer there. Interestingly, upper-body phantoms were felt more vividly than lower-body ones, and sensations in hands, fingers, and toes were more acute than in legs or shoulders—providing early clues about how the brain maps the body. Mitchell proposed several theories to explain phantom limbs that proved remarkably prescient. He noted that severed nerves in the stump often formed sensitive "buttons" that continued to send signals to the brain, making part of the brain unaware that the limb was missing. He also discovered that some people born without limbs still experienced phantoms, suggesting the brain contains a hardwired "scaffold" of the complete body that persists regardless of physical reality. This mental representation proved stubbornly resistant to amputation, revealing that our sense of embodiment is constructed by the brain rather than simply reflecting physical reality. Modern neuroscience has confirmed and expanded Mitchell's insights. We now understand that the brain contains "body maps" in both the motor cortex (which controls movement) and the somatosensory cortex (which processes touch). These maps are organized by body part, but with some counterintuitive features—the hand territory borders the face territory, for instance, even though hands don't border faces on the body. When a limb is amputated, adjacent areas can colonize this region and use its neurons for their own purposes, explaining why touching an amputee's face might trigger sensations in their phantom hand. The World Wars further advanced brain mapping through the systematic study of specific brain injuries. During World War I, German neurologist Tatsuji Inouye studied soldiers with bullet wounds to the back of the head, creating the first detailed map of the visual cortex by correlating the location of brain damage with specific visual field defects. Similarly, Russian neurologist Alexander Luria's work with brain-injured soldiers in World War II revealed specialized regions for language, memory, and planning. These wartime observations established the principle of functional localization—the idea that different brain regions handle different mental functions—while also demonstrating the brain's remarkable capacity for reorganization after injury.

Chapter 6: Modern Breakthroughs: From Face Blindness to Consciousness Studies

The late 20th and early 21st centuries have witnessed remarkable advances in our understanding of the brain, often through studying patients with unique brain injuries or conditions. One fascinating area of research emerged from cases of prosopagnosia, or face blindness, where patients can see faces perfectly well but cannot recognize them—even the faces of close family members or their own reflection. Neurologist Oliver Sacks, who suffered from this condition himself, described how he would sometimes apologize to his own reflection in a mirror, thinking it was another bearded man he had bumped into. These cases revealed that we have specialized neural circuits for recognizing faces, particularly in an area called the fusiform face area (FFA). Unlike other objects, which we process feature by feature, we read faces holistically, at a glance. This specialization makes evolutionary sense given the importance of facial recognition for social species like humans. Interestingly, some patients with brain damage can recognize faces perfectly while being unable to identify any other objects, further demonstrating the specialized nature of facial recognition in the brain. The study of consciousness, once considered outside the realm of scientific investigation, has become a legitimate field of neuroscience in recent decades. Researchers like Francis Crick and Christof Koch began proposing neural correlates of consciousness—specific brain patterns associated with conscious awareness. Studies of patients in vegetative states, under anesthesia, or during sleep have revealed that consciousness isn't an all-or-nothing phenomenon but exists on a spectrum with distinct neural signatures. These investigations have been aided by technologies like functional MRI, which allows scientists to observe the living brain in action. Brain-computer interfaces represent another frontier, allowing direct communication between the brain and external devices. In 2016, a paralyzed man with electrodes implanted in his motor cortex became the first person to feel touch through a robotic hand connected to his brain. Meanwhile, companies like Neuralink are developing less invasive interfaces that might eventually allow direct brain control of computers or even the sharing of thoughts between individuals—technologies that would have seemed like science fiction just decades ago. The field of optogenetics, developed in the early 2000s, allows researchers to control specific neurons with light by inserting genes from light-sensitive algae into brain cells. This technique has revolutionized neuroscience by enabling precise manipulation of neural circuits, helping scientists understand how specific brain networks generate behaviors and mental states. Similarly, the CLARITY technique, which renders brain tissue transparent while preserving its structure, has allowed unprecedented three-dimensional visualization of neural connections. These modern breakthroughs build upon the foundation laid by historical accidents and case studies, from Henri II's jousting injury to split-brain patients. Together, they reveal the brain as an organ of staggering complexity yet remarkable adaptability. As we continue to unravel its mysteries, we gain not only scientific knowledge but also deeper insight into what makes us human—our perceptions, emotions, memories, and consciousness itself. The pioneers who contributed to this understanding, whether scientists or patients whose unusual conditions illuminated brain function, have collectively transformed our conception of the most complex object in the known universe.

Summary

The history of neuroscience reveals a fascinating pattern: many of our greatest insights into the brain have come not through carefully planned experiments but through accidents, injuries, and unusual cases that nature provided. From King Henri II's fatal jousting accident that launched modern brain science to the tribal practices in Papua New Guinea that led to the discovery of prions, these "experiments of nature" have repeatedly transformed our understanding of how the brain works. Each historical accident highlighted in this journey—whether a presidential assassination, a blind explorer's adaptation, or a Civil War amputation—has illuminated a different aspect of brain function, collectively building our modern understanding of neuroscience. This historical perspective offers important lessons for contemporary science and medicine. First, it reminds us that valuable insights can come from unexpected sources and that careful observation of unusual cases remains vital even in our age of sophisticated technology. Second, it demonstrates the remarkable plasticity of the human brain—its ability to adapt to injury, rewire itself, and compensate for damage in ways that continue to surprise researchers. Finally, it underscores the ethical dimension of neuroscience, as many of our most important discoveries came at tremendous human cost. As we continue to explore the frontier of brain science with increasingly powerful tools, we honor these unwitting pioneers by using our knowledge to alleviate suffering and enhance human potential, transforming historical tragedies into lasting benefits for humanity.

About Author

Loading...

Sam Kean

Sam Kean is the New York Times-bestselling author of seven books. He spent years collecting mercury from broken thermometers as a kid, and now lives in Washington, D.C. His stories have appeared in The Best American Science and Nature Writing, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and Slate, among other places, and his work has been featured on NPR’s “Radiolab”, “Science Friday”, and “All Things Considered.” The Bastard Brigade was a “Science Friday” book of the year, while Caesar’s Last Breath was the Guardian science book of the year.from SamKean.com(Un)Official Bio:Sam Kean gets called Sean at least once a month. He grew up in South Dakota, which means more to him than it probably should. He’s a fast reader but a very slow eater. He went to college in Minnesota and studied physics and English. At night, he sometimes comes down with something called “sleep paralysis,” which is the opposite of sleepwalking. One of his books appeared in an iPhone commercial once. Right now, he lives in Washington, D.C., where he earned a master’s degree in library science that he will probably never use. He feels very strongly that open-faced sandwiches are superior to regular ones.

Read more