The Third Pillar

The Third Pillar Plot Summary

Introduction

Throughout human history, societies have been organized around three fundamental pillars: the state, markets, and communities. These forces have constantly interacted, sometimes in harmony and often in tension, shaping the course of civilizations from medieval villages to modern nation-states. When properly balanced, these pillars create stable, prosperous societies; when one dominates at the expense of others, instability and suffering typically follow. The fascinating journey of these three pillars reveals why some societies flourished while others faltered. We'll explore how communities once provided most social functions before states gradually assumed these responsibilities, how markets evolved from simple local exchanges to complex global systems, and how technological revolutions repeatedly disrupted established balances. This historical perspective helps explain contemporary challenges—from rising inequality to political polarization to the sense of alienation felt in many communities. Whether you're interested in economics, politics, or simply understanding the forces shaping our world, this exploration offers valuable insights into how societies might achieve the delicate balance needed for sustainable progress.

Chapter 1: Medieval Foundations: When Three Pillars Were One (Pre-1500)

In medieval Europe, the three pillars of society—community, state, and market—existed in a fundamentally different relationship than they do today. Rather than separate spheres, they were largely fused together within the feudal manor system. The manor served as the basic economic and social unit, where lords provided protection and land access in exchange for labor and military service from peasants. This arrangement created a tightly integrated community where economic transactions were embedded in social relationships rather than governed by impersonal market forces. The Catholic Church played a crucial role in this period, functioning as both a spiritual authority and a practical governing institution. Church teachings shaped economic activity through prohibitions on usury (charging interest) and emphasis on fair pricing. Monasteries served as centers of learning, technological innovation, and charity. The Church effectively filled governance gaps left by weak secular authorities, creating a moral framework that constrained economic behavior and reinforced community bonds. As historian Barbara Tuchman noted, most people "never saw more than a hundred separate individuals in the course of their whole lives," living in small, close-knit communities governed by tradition and religious precepts. Economic life was primarily local and subsistence-oriented. Markets existed but operated within strict community norms and geographic limitations. Weekly markets in towns allowed farmers and craftsmen to exchange goods, but long-distance trade remained limited and risky. Land, the principal source of wealth, wasn't freely bought and sold but allocated through feudal relationships of loyalty and obligation. Guild systems regulated crafts and trades, maintaining quality standards while limiting competition. These arrangements prioritized stability and community welfare over economic growth or individual advancement. This medieval balance began shifting with the revival of long-distance trade from the 11th century onward. As merchants established trading networks across Europe and the Mediterranean, they created wealth outside traditional feudal structures. Growing towns and cities offered alternatives to manor life, attracting those seeking opportunity beyond their birth station. The famous German saying "Stadtluft macht frei" (city air makes you free) reflected how urban environments weakened traditional community constraints. Meanwhile, technological innovations like improved plows, water mills, and new crop rotation systems increased agricultural productivity, creating surpluses that supported specialized crafts and commerce. By the late Middle Ages, this integrated system was showing significant strain. The Black Death (1347-1351) devastated populations but improved survivors' bargaining power, weakening feudal bonds. Growing commerce created a merchant class with interests distinct from landed aristocracy. Early banking systems emerged in Italian city-states, challenging Church restrictions on financial activities. These developments set the stage for the more dramatic transformations of the early modern period, when the three pillars would increasingly separate into distinct spheres with their own logics and institutions. The medieval world, with its fusion of economic, social, and spiritual life, was giving way to more differentiated structures that would eventually produce both unprecedented prosperity and new forms of social dislocation.

Chapter 2: Constitutional Limits: Enabling Market Growth (1500-1800)

Between 1500 and 1800, Europe underwent a profound transformation as states consolidated power while simultaneously developing constitutional limits that enabled market expansion. This period saw the emergence of centralized monarchies with growing administrative capabilities. Military innovations—particularly gunpowder weapons—made traditional castle defenses obsolete and required larger, more disciplined armies. These changes favored rulers who could mobilize substantial resources, leading to territorial consolidation. The number of independent political entities in Europe fell dramatically, from over a thousand around 1500 to just twenty-five by 1900. The relationship between states and markets evolved significantly during this era. Early modern monarchs like Henry VIII in England and Louis XIV in France sought to harness commercial activity to fund their military ambitions. They chartered trading companies, established colonies, and implemented mercantilist policies designed to accumulate national wealth. However, their need for revenue also made them dependent on wealthy merchants and landowners, creating leverage for these groups to demand political concessions. This dynamic played out most dramatically in England, where Parliament gradually wrested control over taxation and spending from the Crown, culminating in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The constitutional settlement that emerged from this conflict proved crucial for economic development. By establishing parliamentary supremacy, independent courts, and protections for property rights, it created an environment where investors and entrepreneurs could operate with reasonable security. As North and Weingast famously argued, these institutional changes allowed the English government to borrow at lower interest rates, giving it crucial advantages in international competition. Similar, though less extensive, constitutional developments occurred in the Dutch Republic and parts of Scandinavia, creating zones where market activity could flourish under predictable legal frameworks. Religious changes further transformed the relationship between communities, markets, and states. The Protestant Reformation challenged the Catholic Church's moral authority over economic activity. Protestant denominations, particularly Calvinism, developed theologies more accommodating to commercial success and capital accumulation. While Max Weber may have overstated the "Protestant work ethic" thesis, Reformed Christianity certainly removed many traditional obstacles to market development. Religious pluralism in countries like the Netherlands and England fostered tolerance and innovation, attracting skilled immigrants and capital from less tolerant regions. These developments occurred alongside dramatic expansions in global trade and colonial exploitation. European powers established colonies and trading posts across the Americas, Africa, and Asia, extracting resources and creating new markets for manufactured goods. The Atlantic slave trade forcibly transported millions of Africans to plantation colonies, generating enormous profits while inflicting immeasurable suffering. These colonial ventures enriched European merchants and states but devastated indigenous communities worldwide. They also created new commodities and consumption patterns that would fuel the coming Industrial Revolution, from cotton textiles to sugar and tobacco. By 1800, the balance between state, market, and community had shifted dramatically in Western Europe. States had grown more powerful but also more constrained by constitutional limits and commercial interests. Markets had expanded from local exchanges to global networks, increasingly governed by impersonal forces rather than community norms. Traditional communities faced growing pressures from commercialization, enclosure of common lands, and new ideologies emphasizing individual rights over collective obligations. This reconfiguration created unprecedented economic dynamism but also new forms of exploitation and dislocation. The stage was set for the even more dramatic transformations of the Industrial Revolution, which would further elevate market forces while challenging both state authority and community cohesion.

Chapter 3: Industrial Revolution: Markets Ascendant, Communities Disrupted (1800-1930)

The Industrial Revolution marked a watershed in human history, fundamentally altering the balance between markets, states, and communities. Beginning in late 18th century Britain, this transformation was powered by technological innovations like the steam engine, power loom, and new iron production methods. These technologies enabled unprecedented increases in productivity—a single worker with a power loom could produce as much cloth in a day as dozens of handloom weavers. Coal-powered factories freed production from geographic constraints, allowing industrial centers to emerge wherever resources, labor, and transportation converged. By the 1830s, Britain had become the "workshop of the world," with other European countries and the United States following similar industrialization paths in subsequent decades. This technological revolution coincided with an intellectual revolution in economic thinking. Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" (1776) articulated a powerful vision of free markets coordinated by an "invisible hand." Smith and subsequent classical economists like David Ricardo argued that removing government restrictions on trade and commerce would maximize prosperity. These ideas gained increasing influence among policymakers, leading to landmark reforms like Britain's repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846. The doctrine of laissez-faire—that government should leave business alone—became the dominant economic philosophy, though its implementation was never as complete as its advocates claimed. The social consequences of industrialization were profound and often traumatic. Traditional craft workers saw their skills devalued by mechanization, while agricultural laborers migrated to rapidly growing industrial cities. These urban centers, built hastily to house factory workers, were frequently overcrowded, unsanitary, and polluted. Friedrich Engels described Manchester's working-class districts as places where "human beings live in crowded and unclean quarters in which the air is more confined than in any other place, and in which the inhabitants can only with difficulty preserve cleanliness." Working conditions in early factories were often dangerous and exploitative, with long hours, child labor, and few protections against injury or illness. The traditional social bonds and mutual support systems of village life were severely weakened in these new urban environments. Market dominance created enormous wealth but distributed it unevenly. A new class of industrial capitalists emerged, exemplified by figures like Richard Arkwright and Andrew Carnegie, who amassed fortunes previously unimaginable for those outside the aristocracy. Meanwhile, many workers experienced declining living standards during the early decades of industrialization. This growing inequality, combined with the loss of traditional protections, fueled social unrest and new political movements. Workers began organizing into trade unions to counter the power of capital, while socialist and communist ideologies offered radical critiques of the market system. The publication of Marx and Engels' "Communist Manifesto" in 1848 articulated a powerful alternative vision that would shape political struggles for generations. States gradually responded to these challenges with new forms of regulation and social provision. Factory acts limited child labor and regulated working conditions. Public health measures addressed urban sanitation and disease. Public education systems expanded to meet the needs of industrial economies for literate workers. By the late 19th century, Germany under Bismarck had pioneered social insurance programs, partly to undercut socialist appeals to workers. These developments represented the beginning of the modern welfare state, as governments assumed responsibilities previously handled by families and communities. However, state intervention remained limited compared to later periods, and market forces continued to dominate economic and social life. By the early 20th century, the industrial market economy had transformed not just production methods but the very fabric of society. Traditional communities based on personal relationships and shared customs had given way to more impersonal, market-mediated interactions. This transition created unprecedented material prosperity but also generated new forms of insecurity and alienation. The Great Depression of the 1930s would expose the vulnerabilities of this market-dominated system, triggering further shifts in the balance between the three pillars. The search for ways to reconcile economic dynamism with social cohesion would become a central challenge for industrial societies, leading to diverse experiments in state intervention, labor organization, and community rebuilding in the decades to come.

Chapter 4: Democratic Response: Community Power Through State Action (1930-1980)

The Great Depression of the 1930s marked a turning point in the relationship between markets, states, and communities. The market crash of 1929 and subsequent economic collapse revealed the vulnerabilities of unfettered capitalism. Unemployment in the United States reached 25%, while industrial production fell by nearly half. Similar crises affected economies worldwide. This catastrophic market failure discredited laissez-faire economics and created political space for dramatic expansions of state activity. As President Franklin Roosevelt declared in his 1933 inaugural address, "We must act, and act quickly." The New Deal in America and similar programs elsewhere represented a fundamental shift in governance philosophy. Roosevelt's administration created an alphabet soup of new agencies—the WPA, CCC, TVA, and others—that put millions to work on public projects, regulated financial markets, supported farmers, and developed infrastructure. Social Security provided retirement benefits for the elderly, while the National Labor Relations Act protected workers' right to organize. These programs didn't just address immediate economic needs; they established a new relationship between citizens and government. The state now assumed responsibility for economic security and opportunity in ways previously unimaginable in American political culture. World War II further transformed this relationship, as governments mobilized entire societies for total war. Rationing, price controls, industrial planning, and massive public investment demonstrated the state's capacity to direct economic activity toward collective goals. The war effort created new bonds of national solidarity while proving that full employment was achievable through government action. When peace returned, citizens expected their governments to maintain prosperity and expand social protections. The GI Bill in America provided education and housing support for returning veterans, helping create a broad middle class. Western European countries developed comprehensive welfare states, with Britain's National Health Service exemplifying the new approach to social provision. This period saw democracy become the mechanism through which communities could influence both states and markets. Expanded suffrage, strong labor unions, and mass political parties gave ordinary citizens unprecedented voice in governance. Progressive taxation, financial regulation, and antitrust enforcement constrained economic elites, while public investment in education, housing, and infrastructure expanded opportunity. These democratic pressures produced what economists call "the Great Compression"—a remarkable reduction in income inequality across developed economies. In the United States, the share of national income going to the top 1% fell from over 20% in the 1920s to less than 10% by the 1970s. The postwar economic boom, often called the "Golden Age of Capitalism," seemed to validate this new balance between the three pillars. Western economies grew at unprecedented rates between 1945 and 1973, with the benefits widely shared across social classes. Real wages rose steadily, while new technologies like household appliances, automobiles, and televisions transformed daily life. Homeownership expanded dramatically, supported by government programs like the FHA and VA loans in America. This prosperity strengthened communities by providing economic security and opportunity, while democratic governance ensured that market dynamism served broader social goals. By the 1970s, however, this postwar consensus faced mounting challenges. The oil shocks of 1973 and 1979 triggered stagflation—the painful combination of high unemployment and high inflation. Productivity growth slowed across advanced economies, making it harder to finance generous welfare states. Globalization and technological change began disrupting traditional industries and communities. These economic difficulties coincided with growing cultural divisions over issues like gender roles, sexuality, and immigration, further straining social cohesion. As the decade ended, voters in many countries turned toward leaders promising market-oriented reforms, setting the stage for a new shift in the balance between the three pillars.

Chapter 5: Digital Disruption: Global Markets and Local Decline (1980-2010)

The period from 1980 to 2010 witnessed a dramatic rebalancing of power among the three pillars, with markets gaining unprecedented global reach while communities experienced significant disruption. This shift began with the market-oriented reforms implemented by leaders like Ronald Reagan in the United States and Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom. Deregulation, privatization, tax cuts, and reduced labor protections became the dominant policy agenda across much of the developed world. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 further reinforced the perception that market capitalism had definitively triumphed over alternative economic systems, leading Francis Fukuyama to famously declare "the end of history." The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) revolution accelerated these trends by enabling truly global markets. Personal computers, the internet, mobile phones, and eventually smartphones transformed how people worked, communicated, and consumed. These technologies allowed companies to coordinate complex supply chains across national boundaries, outsourcing production to wherever costs were lowest. Financial markets became increasingly integrated and sophisticated, with capital flowing across borders at unprecedented speed. International trade agreements reduced tariffs and other barriers, creating what Thomas Friedman called a "flat world" where goods, services, and ideas moved more freely than ever before. These developments created enormous wealth but distributed it unevenly. A new class of technology entrepreneurs emerged, exemplified by figures like Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and later Mark Zuckerberg, who built companies worth billions in remarkably short timeframes. Financial sector profits and compensation soared as deregulation and technological innovation enabled new forms of trading and investment. Meanwhile, manufacturing regions in developed countries experienced significant decline as production shifted to lower-cost locations. Communities that had once thrived around factories, mines, or mills saw their economic foundations erode, leading to unemployment, outmigration, and social problems. Labor markets underwent profound restructuring during this period. The wage premium for education increased substantially—in the United States, college graduates earned approximately 50% more than high school graduates in 1980, but by 2005, this gap had grown to nearly 100%. Unions declined in membership and influence, reducing workers' collective bargaining power. Employment became more precarious for many, with temporary contracts, part-time work, and self-employment replacing traditional career paths. These changes contributed to growing income inequality across developed economies. In the United States, the share of national income going to the top 1% roughly doubled between 1980 and 2007. Communities experienced these changes in dramatically different ways. Urban areas with concentrations of highly educated workers in technology, finance, and professional services prospered enormously. Cities like San Francisco, New York, London, and Tokyo became global hubs of innovation and wealth creation. Meanwhile, smaller cities and rural areas dependent on traditional industries often faced severe economic decline. This geographic sorting created what economists call "superstar cities" alongside "left behind" regions, with profound implications for social cohesion and political stability. As families with means increasingly moved to high-opportunity areas with good schools, economic segregation intensified, further weakening mixed-income communities. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis revealed the fragility of the system that had developed. Decades of financial deregulation, combined with technological innovation in financial products, created complex interconnections that few understood. When the housing bubble burst, the resulting crisis spread rapidly through global markets, triggering the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. The state, which had retreated from economic management, was forced to intervene massively to prevent complete financial collapse. However, the bailouts of financial institutions, contrasted with the suffering of ordinary citizens who lost homes and jobs, created deep public resentment that would fuel political developments in the following decade. The crisis exposed how the balance between markets, states, and communities had tilted too far toward market dominance, setting the stage for the populist backlash that would follow.

Chapter 6: Populist Backlash: Communities Demand Protection (2010-Present)

The aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis revealed deep fractures in the social contract. Despite massive government interventions that prevented economic collapse, the recovery proved uneven and inadequate for many. While financial markets rebounded quickly and technology companies reached new heights of profitability, wage growth remained sluggish and many communities never fully recovered. This divergence between Wall Street and Main Street fueled a profound sense of betrayal among those left behind by globalization and technological change. Populist movements emerged across the democratic world, challenging established political parties and elites. The Tea Party movement and Occupy Wall Street represented early manifestations in the United States, while similar movements gained strength across Europe. Though these movements varied in their specific grievances and proposed solutions, they shared common elements: distrust of experts and institutions, skepticism toward globalization and immigration, and appeals to national identity as a source of solidarity. The Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom and Donald Trump's election in the United States in 2016 represented watershed moments in this populist surge, demonstrating the political power of communities that felt neglected by mainstream politics. Economic grievances played a central role in fueling this populist wave. Research by economists like David Autor demonstrated that regions more exposed to Chinese import competition suffered lasting damage to employment and wages. The benefits of globalization and technological change had accrued disproportionately to those with advanced education and urban locations, while the costs fell heavily on working-class communities in industrial regions. These economic dislocations manifested in alarming social trends, including what economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton termed "deaths of despair"—rising mortality among middle-aged whites without college degrees due to suicide, drug overdose, and alcohol-related illness. However, the populist backlash wasn't merely economic—it also reflected cultural anxieties and status concerns. Many traditionally dominant groups felt threatened by demographic change, immigration, and evolving social norms. Rural and small-town residents resented the perceived condescension of urban elites and the marginalization of their values in mainstream culture. These cultural grievances interacted with economic insecurity to create a powerful sense of displacement and loss of control, which populist leaders skillfully channeled into political mobilization. Social media platforms intensified these dynamics by creating echo chambers that reinforced existing beliefs while exposing users to content that provoked outrage. These technologies, initially hailed as democratizing forces, increasingly appeared to undermine democratic discourse by facilitating the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. The business models of companies like Facebook and YouTube, which prioritized engagement over accuracy or social cohesion, created perverse incentives that political entrepreneurs exploited. Meanwhile, the concentration of technological power in a few dominant platforms raised concerns about privacy, competition, and democratic accountability. The COVID-19 pandemic beginning in 2020 further exposed and exacerbated existing imbalances. The crisis demonstrated both the necessity of effective state action and the limitations of market mechanisms in addressing public health emergencies. It also highlighted the importance of community resilience, as neighbors helped each other through lockdowns and economic hardship. Yet the pandemic's uneven impact—falling hardest on disadvantaged communities—underscored persistent inequalities. The accelerated adoption of remote work and digital services during this period promised to further transform the relationship between geography, community, and economic opportunity, with implications that continue to unfold.

Chapter 7: Rebalancing Society: Toward Inclusive Localism

The historical journey through the shifting balance of community, state, and market reveals a critical insight: societies function best when these three pillars complement and check each other rather than when any one dominates. Today's challenges—from economic inequality to social fragmentation to democratic dysfunction—stem largely from imbalances that have developed over decades. The path forward requires not choosing between these pillars but rebalancing them in ways appropriate for the 21st century. Inclusive localism offers a promising framework for this rebalancing. This approach recognizes the importance of empowered local communities while ensuring they remain connected to broader markets and protected by national standards. It combines the social cohesion and democratic engagement that strong communities provide with the economic dynamism of open markets and the equity guarantees of an effective state. In practice, this means decentralizing many decisions to the community level while maintaining national frameworks that prevent parochialism or discrimination. Revitalizing communities requires both economic and social investments. Economically, this means addressing the spatial inequality that has divided prosperous urban centers from struggling regions. Place-based policies can help, from infrastructure investments to support for local entrepreneurship ecosystems. Educational institutions, particularly community colleges and technical training programs, can serve as anchors for regional development by aligning skills training with local economic opportunities. Meanwhile, antitrust enforcement and regulatory reforms can help prevent excessive market concentration that disadvantages smaller communities and businesses. Socially, rebuilding community cohesion in diverse societies requires creating spaces for meaningful interaction across social divides. This might involve revitalizing public institutions like libraries, parks, and community centers that bring people together around shared interests and needs. It means supporting civic organizations that bridge racial, religious, and political differences. And it requires nurturing a civic identity that embraces pluralism while acknowledging the human need for belonging. The most successful communities combine strong internal bonds with openness to newcomers and new ideas—what sociologists call "bridging social capital." Digital technologies, despite their disruptive effects, can also support community renewal when properly governed. Broadband infrastructure enables remote work and entrepreneurship in previously isolated areas. Online platforms can connect local producers with broader markets and facilitate community organizing. However, realizing these benefits requires addressing the digital divide through both infrastructure investment and digital literacy programs. It also demands thoughtful regulation of digital platforms to prevent monopolization and protect privacy. The state's role in this rebalancing is crucial but must evolve beyond traditional centralized bureaucracy. Effective governance today requires greater collaboration across levels of government and between public, private, and civic sectors. National governments should establish frameworks and provide resources while allowing significant local adaptation. This means moving beyond one-size-fits-all policies toward more flexible approaches that respect community differences while ensuring basic rights and opportunities for all citizens. It also means reforming democratic institutions to make them more responsive to citizen input while resistant to capture by special interests.

Summary

The central tension running through this historical narrative is the constant struggle to maintain balance among community, state, and market forces. When properly aligned, these three pillars create societies that are simultaneously cohesive, just, and prosperous. When imbalanced—as when markets overwhelm communities or states dominate both—societies experience disruption, inequality, and eventually political backlash. This pattern has repeated across centuries, from medieval guild systems through industrial revolutions to today's digital economy. The lessons for our current moment are profound. First, we must recognize that neither unfettered markets, nor all-powerful states, nor isolated communities can alone provide sustainable solutions to complex social problems. Second, technological and economic changes that disrupt established balances require deliberate policy responses—not to prevent change, but to ensure its benefits are widely shared and its costs fairly distributed. Finally, rebuilding community strength in an age of global markets and powerful states requires institutional innovation, not nostalgia for vanished social forms. By developing models of inclusive localism that empower communities while keeping them connected to broader systems, we can work toward a more balanced society that honors our need for both belonging and opportunity, for both tradition and innovation, for both local roots and global connections.

About Author

Loading...

Raghuram G. Rajan

Read more

Related Books by Raghuram G. Rajan

Loading...

Fault Lines

Raghuram G. Rajan

How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten The World Economy

★★★★☆4.1