Too Much of a Good Thing

Too Much of a Good Thing Plot Summary

Introduction

Throughout human history, our bodies have been shaped by natural selection to maximize survival in harsh environments. For nearly 200,000 years, our ancestors faced food scarcity, dehydration, predators, and violent conflicts. The traits that helped them survive these challenges were passed down through generations, becoming deeply embedded in our genetic makeup. These survival traits served our species extraordinarily well, allowing humans to spread across the globe and eventually dominate every ecosystem we entered. Yet in our modern world of abundance, these same life-saving traits have become problematic. The instincts that once protected us from starvation now drive obesity epidemics. Our bodies' sophisticated mechanisms for conserving salt and water contribute to widespread hypertension. Our finely-tuned fear responses, essential for avoiding predators, manifest as anxiety disorders and depression. And our remarkable ability to form blood clots, which prevented our ancestors from bleeding to death after injuries, now causes heart attacks and strokes. This fundamental mismatch between our ancient biology and modern environment explains many of today's most common and devastating health challenges.

Chapter 1: Genetic Foundations: How Natural Selection Shaped Human Biology

The human body is the product of countless genetic adaptations that occurred over millennia. Our species, Homo sapiens, emerged in Africa approximately 200,000 years ago, with our earliest ancestors facing extreme environmental pressures that shaped our genetic makeup. During this formative period, humans who possessed traits that enhanced survival in harsh conditions were more likely to reproduce and pass these traits to their offspring. This process of natural selection gradually built the genetic foundation that all modern humans share. One fascinating example of genetic adaptation is our skin color. As humans migrated from Africa to northern latitudes with less intense sunlight, lighter skin became advantageous for vitamin D production. This led to the selection of mutations that reduced melanin production in populations living farther from the equator. Similarly, the ability to digest lactose into adulthood emerged only after humans domesticated cattle around 10,000 years ago, primarily in populations with dairy-farming traditions. This mutation spread rapidly because it provided significant nutritional advantages to those who carried it. Some genetic adaptations spread because they offered protection against specific threats. For instance, a mutation in the CCR5 gene, which now protects some individuals against HIV infection, likely became common in European populations because it provided resistance against bubonic plague or smallpox in earlier centuries. This demonstrates how traits selected for one purpose can unexpectedly benefit us in entirely different circumstances centuries later. Our genetic makeup continues to evolve today, but at a pace far slower than the rapid changes in our environment. Each human carries approximately 65 new mutations not present in their parents, and with billions of people on Earth, the potential for beneficial mutations has never been greater. However, natural selection requires many generations to significantly alter population-wide traits, and our modern medical interventions often circumvent this process by enabling individuals with disadvantageous traits to survive and reproduce. This genetic foundation, shaped primarily during our hunter-gatherer past, represents both our greatest strength and, increasingly, our greatest vulnerability in the modern world. The traits that once ensured our survival now interact with our radically different environment in ways that often undermine our health and longevity.

Chapter 2: Feast or Famine: From Food Scarcity to Modern Obesity

For most of human existence, finding enough food was a daily struggle. Our Paleolithic ancestors lived as hunter-gatherers, expending significant energy to secure unpredictable food supplies. During this era spanning roughly 200,000 to 10,000 years ago, humans evolved powerful biological drives to consume high-calorie foods whenever available. This was an essential survival adaptation in an environment where the next meal was never guaranteed and famine was a recurring threat. The human body developed sophisticated mechanisms to store energy efficiently during times of plenty. Our fat cells can expand up to four times their normal size, and we can add new fat cells when existing ones reach capacity. Hormones like leptin and ghrelin evolved to regulate hunger and satiety, but with a strong bias toward overconsumption when food is available. Our brains became wired to find calorie-dense foods particularly rewarding, with neural pathways that release dopamine when we consume sugar and fat – creating a pleasure response similar to that triggered by addictive substances. The agricultural revolution beginning around 10,000 BCE marked a profound shift in human nutrition. Farming allowed for more reliable food supplies but narrowed dietary diversity. Early agricultural societies often relied heavily on a few staple crops, which sometimes led to nutritional deficiencies unknown to hunter-gatherers who consumed a wider variety of foods. Archaeological evidence shows that early farmers were often shorter and less healthy than their hunter-gatherer predecessors, though agriculture supported much larger populations. The industrial revolution and subsequent technological advances have created an unprecedented food environment characterized by constant abundance, minimal physical effort to obtain food, and the widespread availability of highly processed, calorie-dense options. Food manufacturers have learned to exploit our innate preferences for sugar, salt, and fat by creating products that deliver these nutrients in concentrations far exceeding anything found in nature – what scientists call "supernormal stimuli" that override our natural satiety mechanisms. The consequences of this mismatch between our ancient biology and modern environment are evident in global obesity statistics. Worldwide obesity has nearly tripled since 1975, with over 650 million adults classified as obese. In the United States, more than one-third of adults are obese, and another third are overweight. This epidemic has triggered corresponding increases in type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. Particularly concerning is the rise of obesity and diabetes in children, who may face health consequences throughout their lives. Our bodies remain exquisitely adapted for an environment of scarcity that no longer exists for most people in developed nations. The very traits that helped our ancestors survive food shortages now predispose us to obesity and its related diseases when we live in an environment of constant abundance and minimal physical activity.

Chapter 3: Salt and Water: Ancient Necessities Become Modern Threats

Water and salt were precious commodities throughout human evolution. Our ancestors evolved in hot African environments where dehydration posed a constant threat to survival. The human body is approximately 60% water, and losing just 10% of this fluid can be life-threatening. To protect against this danger, our bodies developed sophisticated mechanisms to conserve water and maintain proper fluid balance, particularly when facing dehydration or excessive sweating. The ability to retain salt was especially crucial for early humans. Salt helps maintain proper fluid balance, enables nerve impulse transmission, and facilitates muscle contraction. Unlike many nutrients, salt cannot be manufactured by the body and must be obtained through diet. In prehistoric environments, salt was scarce – natural food sources typically contained very little sodium, and humans evolved a powerful salt appetite to ensure adequate intake. Our taste buds became highly sensitive to salt, creating a pleasurable response that encouraged consumption of this vital mineral when it was found. This biological drive for salt served our ancestors well. Hunter-gatherers typically consumed less than 1 gram of sodium daily, obtained primarily from natural food sources. Their kidneys evolved remarkable efficiency at reabsorbing and conserving sodium, with multiple hormonal systems dedicated to maintaining salt balance. When salt intake is low, these systems activate to retain nearly all consumed sodium; when intake is high, healthy kidneys can eliminate the excess – though this capability has limits that become evident in our modern context. The agricultural revolution gradually increased salt availability, but it wasn't until modern times that salt became ubiquitous. The development of salt mining and preservation techniques made this once-rare mineral widely accessible. By the 19th century, the average person consumed about 7 grams of sodium daily – far more than our evolutionary needs. Today, processed foods and restaurant meals have pushed average sodium consumption even higher, with many Americans consuming over 3.4 grams daily, more than double the recommended amount. This dramatic increase in salt consumption has significant health consequences. While our kidneys can handle occasional salt excesses, chronic high intake overwhelms these systems. Excess sodium causes water retention, increasing blood volume and pressure against arterial walls. Over time, this leads to hypertension (high blood pressure), which affects nearly one-third of American adults and is a leading risk factor for heart disease, stroke, and kidney failure. The connection is so strong that in populations with very low sodium intake, hypertension is virtually nonexistent, and blood pressure typically doesn't rise with age. The story of salt illustrates a fundamental paradox of human evolution: the very adaptations that once ensured our survival now contribute to disease in our altered environment. Our powerful salt appetite and efficient sodium retention mechanisms – once critical for survival in salt-scarce environments – now drive us to consume amounts that our bodies were never designed to handle, with serious consequences for public health.

Chapter 4: Fear Systems: Protective Vigilance to Anxiety Disorders

Fear is one of our most ancient and powerful emotions, evolving as a critical survival mechanism that helped our ancestors avoid countless dangers. For early humans living in environments filled with predators and hostile competing groups, a robust fear response could mean the difference between life and death. Those who possessed heightened vigilance and rapid fear reactions were more likely to survive and pass these traits to their offspring. The human fear system operates through sophisticated neural pathways centered in the amygdala, a small almond-shaped structure deep within the brain. When we perceive a potential threat, the amygdala triggers an immediate "fight-or-flight" response, flooding our bodies with stress hormones like adrenaline and cortisol. These hormones increase heart rate, redirect blood to muscles, enhance visual acuity, and prepare the body for immediate action – all without conscious thought. This rapid response system bypasses slower cognitive processing because in life-threatening situations, even a split-second delay could prove fatal. Our brains evolved with a strong bias toward false positives in threat detection. From an evolutionary perspective, mistakenly perceiving a threat when none exists (like mistaking a shadow for a predator) carried a minimal cost – perhaps unnecessary energy expenditure or momentary stress. However, failing to detect a genuine threat could be immediately fatal. This "better safe than sorry" principle became deeply embedded in our neural architecture, creating a tendency to overestimate dangers and respond with heightened vigilance to potential threats. Memory systems co-evolved with fear responses to enhance survival. Emotionally charged experiences, particularly frightening ones, create stronger neural connections and more persistent memories than neutral events. This adaptive trait helped our ancestors remember and avoid dangerous situations, locations, or individuals. The brain's remarkable ability to generalize from specific threats to similar situations further enhanced survival by allowing humans to anticipate dangers they hadn't personally experienced. In modern environments, however, these once-adaptive fear systems often misfire. Today's world presents few immediate physical threats but countless psychological stressors – from work deadlines to social media comparisons – that can trigger the same physiological responses designed for life-or-death situations. When chronically activated, these stress responses contribute to anxiety disorders, which now affect nearly 20% of American adults annually. Similarly, depression, which may have evolved as an adaptive response to help individuals conserve energy and accept defeat in no-win situations, becomes maladaptive when triggered by modern social and economic pressures. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represents another example of an adaptive system functioning in a context for which it wasn't designed. The intense memories and hypervigilance characteristic of PTSD would have helped our ancestors avoid repeated dangerous encounters. But in modern warfare or urban violence, where traumatic experiences can be prolonged and intense beyond anything our ancestors faced, these same mechanisms can create debilitating symptoms that persist long after the danger has passed. Our fear systems, exquisitely calibrated for a world of immediate physical dangers, now operate in an environment of chronic psychological stress for which they were never designed. This mismatch helps explain the epidemic of anxiety, depression, and related disorders that characterize modern life despite our unprecedented physical safety.

Chapter 5: Blood Clotting: Life-Saving Mechanisms Turn Deadly

Blood clotting represents one of the most remarkable survival adaptations in human physiology. For our ancestors, the ability to rapidly form blood clots after injury was essential for survival. Without this mechanism, even minor cuts could lead to fatal blood loss. Throughout human evolution, those with more efficient clotting systems were more likely to survive injuries and reproduce, passing these traits to subsequent generations. The human clotting system achieves its life-saving function through two complementary pathways. The first involves platelets, small cell fragments that circulate in the bloodstream and rapidly adhere to damaged blood vessel walls, forming an initial plug. The second pathway involves a cascade of clotting proteins that create fibrin, a mesh-like structure that reinforces the platelet plug and forms a more stable clot. This dual system provides redundancy and ensures rapid response to injuries of various types and severities. Perhaps nowhere was efficient clotting more critical than in childbirth. Before modern medicine, postpartum hemorrhage was a leading cause of maternal mortality. Women with more effective clotting mechanisms were more likely to survive childbirth and raise their children to adulthood. This created strong selective pressure for enhanced clotting ability, particularly in women. During pregnancy, a woman's blood naturally becomes more prone to clotting – an adaptation that reduces bleeding risk during delivery but also increases the risk of dangerous blood clots elsewhere in the body. While this finely tuned clotting system was essential in our evolutionary past, it has become problematic in modern environments. Today, most of us lead relatively sedentary lives compared to our ancestors. Physical inactivity slows blood flow, particularly in the legs, increasing the risk of spontaneous clot formation. When these clots break loose and travel to the lungs (pulmonary embolism) or brain (ischemic stroke), they can be fatal. Similarly, atherosclerosis – the buildup of fatty deposits in arteries – can trigger inappropriate clotting that blocks blood flow to the heart, causing heart attacks. The statistics reveal the magnitude of this mismatch between our biology and modern lifestyle. Heart disease and stroke, both primarily caused by inappropriate blood clotting, are the first and fourth leading causes of death in the United States, respectively. Together, they claim more lives than all forms of cancer combined. In fact, diseases caused by excessive or inappropriate clotting now cause about 25 percent of all deaths in industrialized nations – more than four times the number of deaths caused by inadequate clotting (such as from trauma or bleeding disorders). Medical science has developed numerous interventions to address these problems, from blood-thinning medications to surgical procedures that open blocked arteries. However, these treatments often require careful balancing – too little clotting ability increases bleeding risk, while too much increases the risk of heart attack and stroke. This delicate balance highlights the fundamental challenge: our clotting system evolved for a very different environment and lifestyle than most of us experience today.

Chapter 6: The Adaptation Gap: Why Our Genes Can't Keep Pace

Evolution operates on timescales vastly different from human lifespans or even recorded history. Natural selection requires many generations to significantly alter the genetic makeup of a population, with beneficial mutations spreading gradually as they confer reproductive advantages. This slow pace of genetic change has created what scientists call the "adaptation gap" – the growing mismatch between our ancient biology and our rapidly changing modern environment. The human genome was largely shaped during our species' long history as hunter-gatherers, a period spanning roughly 200,000 years. During this time, natural selection favored traits that enhanced survival and reproduction in environments characterized by food scarcity, physical danger, and infectious disease. These selective pressures remained relatively constant for thousands of generations, allowing our biology to become exquisitely adapted to these conditions. Even the agricultural revolution, beginning around 10,000 years ago, has allowed for only about 400 generations of potential genetic adaptation – barely enough time for significant genomic changes to spread throughout human populations. By contrast, the most dramatic changes in human living conditions have occurred in just the past few centuries – or even decades. The industrial revolution, urbanization, modern medicine, and technological innovations have transformed our environment at a pace that completely outstrips our genetic ability to adapt. Consider that the first automobile wasn't invented until 1886, television didn't become widespread until the 1950s, and the internet didn't enter common use until the 1990s. These and countless other changes have created living conditions utterly foreign to those for which our genes were selected. Some limited genetic adaptation to recent environmental changes has occurred. For example, lactase persistence – the ability to digest milk into adulthood – evolved independently in several populations after the domestication of dairy animals. Similarly, populations with long histories of agriculture show genetic adaptations for processing starch and carbohydrates. However, these represent exceptions rather than the rule, and even these adaptations required thousands of years to become widespread. The consequences of this adaptation gap are evident in global health statistics. Diseases that were rare or nonexistent among hunter-gatherers – including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and many mental health disorders – now represent the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. These conditions, often called "diseases of civilization," reflect the fundamental mismatch between our Paleolithic bodies and our post-industrial environment. Epigenetics – changes in gene expression that don't alter the underlying DNA sequence – offers a potential mechanism for more rapid adaptation. Environmental factors can trigger epigenetic changes that affect how genes function, and some evidence suggests these changes might be passed to offspring. However, research indicates that most epigenetic modifications are reset during reproduction, limiting their potential as a mechanism for rapid population-wide adaptation. The adaptation gap presents a fundamental challenge for human health in the 21st century. Our genes simply cannot evolve fast enough to keep pace with our rapidly changing environment and lifestyle. This reality forces us to confront difficult questions about how to address the resulting health challenges – whether through behavioral changes that better align with our evolutionary heritage, medical interventions that compensate for our biological limitations, or environmental modifications that reduce the mismatch between our genes and our surroundings.

Chapter 7: Finding Balance: Reconciling Ancient Biology with Modern Life

Despite understanding the mismatch between our evolutionary programming and modern environment, changing our behavior remains extraordinarily difficult. Our brains and bodies were designed to seek calories, crave salt, respond anxiously to potential threats, and form blood clots readily – all adaptations that enhanced survival in prehistoric environments. Consciously overriding these deeply ingrained tendencies requires tremendous effort and often yields disappointing results. Consider the challenge of weight loss. Studies consistently show that while many diets produce short-term results, approximately 80-95% of people who lose weight eventually regain it. This isn't simply a matter of willpower or motivation. When we lose weight, our bodies respond as though facing starvation – precisely the condition this system evolved to prevent. Hormones that regulate hunger and metabolism change dramatically, increasing appetite while reducing energy expenditure. These biological responses, which helped our ancestors survive food shortages, now sabotage our conscious efforts to maintain weight loss in an environment of abundance. Similar challenges exist with salt reduction. Our powerful salt appetite evolved when sodium was scarce and vital for survival. Now, despite knowing the health benefits of reducing salt intake, many people find low-sodium foods unpalatable and unsatisfying. Studies show that while taste preferences for salt can gradually adapt to lower levels, this adaptation is easily reversed by even occasional exposure to saltier foods. The ubiquity of processed foods with high sodium content makes sustained behavioral change particularly challenging. Anxiety and fear responses present their own difficulties. Our brains evolved to identify and remember threats, with a strong bias toward false positives. Cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness practices can help manage these responses, but they require consistent practice to overcome our default settings. The immediate, automatic nature of fear responses – which bypass conscious thought by design – makes them particularly resistant to rational control. Even when we intellectually understand that a situation poses no real danger, our bodies may still react with the full physiological stress response. Social and environmental factors further complicate behavioral change. Humans evolved as highly social creatures sensitive to group norms. When unhealthy behaviors become normalized – as has occurred with oversized food portions, sedentary lifestyles, and chronic stress – swimming against this cultural current requires extraordinary effort. Food manufacturers, advertisers, and social media companies understand and exploit our evolutionary vulnerabilities, creating environments that trigger our ancient drives while undermining our modern health goals. Despite these challenges, behavioral changes can make meaningful differences in health outcomes. Regular physical activity, even at modest levels, provides significant protection against many modern diseases. Mindfulness practices can reduce stress and anxiety. Dietary changes, while difficult to maintain, can improve health markers when sustained. The most successful approaches typically involve small, incremental changes rather than dramatic lifestyle overhauls, and they acknowledge rather than ignore our evolutionary programming. The limitations of behavioral change alone suggest that addressing our evolutionary mismatch may require a multi-faceted approach. This might include environmental modifications that make healthy choices easier, medical interventions that compensate for our biological limitations, and targeted behavioral strategies that work with rather than against our evolutionary tendencies. By understanding both the power and the limitations of mind over matter, we can develop more effective approaches to thriving in a world very different from the one for which we evolved.

Summary

The fundamental tension running throughout human health history is the growing mismatch between our ancient biology and our modern environment. Our bodies were shaped by natural selection to survive in conditions of scarcity, danger, and physical exertion – circumstances that bear little resemblance to contemporary life in developed nations. The very traits that ensured our ancestors' survival – powerful drives to consume calories and salt, heightened vigilance against threats, and efficient blood clotting – now contribute to the leading causes of disease and death. This mismatch explains why conditions like obesity, hypertension, anxiety disorders, and cardiovascular disease have become so prevalent despite unprecedented medical advances. Looking forward, addressing these challenges requires a nuanced approach that acknowledges our evolutionary heritage while adapting to modern realities. First, we must recognize that willpower alone is often insufficient to overcome deeply ingrained biological drives; environmental modifications that make healthy choices easier may prove more effective than relying solely on individual behavior change. Second, medical interventions that safely compensate for our evolutionary limitations – from medications that reduce inappropriate clotting to therapies that address anxiety without eliminating beneficial vigilance – will remain essential components of modern health care. Finally, we might draw inspiration from hunter-gatherer societies that maintained health without modern medicine, incorporating elements of their physical activity patterns, social connections, and dietary diversity into contemporary lifestyles. By understanding ourselves as creatures shaped by evolution but capable of innovation, we can develop more effective strategies for thriving in a world very different from the one for which we were designed.

About Author

Loading...

Lee Goldman

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the Goodreads database with this name.

Read more