Unworking

Unworking Plot Summary

Introduction

The modern office as we know it today has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past century. Step back in time to the early 1920s, and you would find an office environment dominated by rigid hierarchies, mechanical typewriters, and rows upon rows of clerks seated at identical desks under the watchful eyes of supervisors. This was the dawn of the modern office – a place where efficiency reigned supreme, inspired by Frederick Taylor's principles of scientific management that sought to optimize human performance much like factory machinery. What makes the evolution of the office so fascinating is how it reflects broader societal changes throughout history. The office has been a mirror of our shifting values – from the pursuit of pure efficiency to our current focus on employee experience. By understanding this evolution, we gain insight not just into workplace design, but into changing power dynamics, technological revolutions, and human psychology. Whether you're a business leader, workplace designer, or simply curious about how our work environments shape our lives, this journey through office history reveals how the spaces we work in profoundly influence productivity, creativity, and well-being.

Chapter 1: Scientific Management and the Birth of the Modern Office (1900-1930)

The early 20th century marked a decisive break with the past as the modern office emerged from the shadows of the industrial revolution. Between 1900 and 1930, America was becoming an economic powerhouse, and the office was reimagined as a temple of efficiency. This was the era when the traditional clerk – who had once worked at a comfortable roll-top desk in quiet dignity – was suddenly thrust into what resembled a human factory. Frederick Taylor, an American engineer, became the pivotal figure in this transformation. His 1911 book "The Principles of Scientific Management" proposed that there was one optimal way to perform any task, and that managers should dissect work into its smallest components to maximize output. Under Taylorism, as it became known, office workers were closely monitored, with managers using stopwatches to track everything from filing habits to bathroom breaks. The focus was entirely on productivity, with little consideration for employee comfort or satisfaction. The physical environment of these early modern offices reflected this mechanical philosophy. Large, open floors housed rows of standardized desks arranged in grid-like patterns for easy supervision. Hierarchy was clearly visible – executives occupied private offices on the perimeter with windows and better furniture, while clerks toiled in the center under artificial light. The advent of new technologies like the typewriter, telephone, and vertical filing cabinet further standardized work processes while enabling large bureaucracies to process information at unprecedented scales. Architecture itself embraced this new vision. Frank Lloyd Wright's 1904 Larkin Building in Buffalo, New York, is widely considered the first iconic project of the modern office. With its vast atrium proclaiming organizational unity and the corporate slogan "Intelligence, Enthusiasm, Control" emblazoned on walls, it exemplified the era's values. Workers labored in complete silence (conversation was banned) in serried ranks under close supervision. The influence of Taylorism extended far beyond American shores. Its principles shaped workplaces across the world, from Imperial Japan to Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Even Lenin, while critical of its capitalist origins, acknowledged its value in industrial organization. By the 1920s, efficiency had become the unquestioned gospel of office design and management – a legacy that would prove remarkably durable for decades to come.

Chapter 2: The Social Democratic Office Model (1945-1980)

The period following World War II saw a significant shift in office design philosophy. From 1945 to 1980, as Europe rebuilt from the ashes of war, a more humanistic approach emerged that placed growing importance on social interaction and community. This social democratic office model departed decisively from the Taylorist efficiency machine of the previous era. The first real expression of this new approach came from Germany, where the Quickborner consulting team pioneered the concept of Bürolandschaft (office landscaping) in the late 1950s. Founded by brothers Wolfgang and Eberhard Schnelle, this revolutionary approach abandoned regimented rows of desks in favor of organic layouts based on work communication patterns. The design featured flowing lines, informal areas for relaxation, and elegant planters, signaling that the office could escape its machine-like image. This concept quickly spread across Europe and to America, with companies like Eastman Kodak and Du Pont embracing the German import. By the 1970s, political and social movements had further influenced workplace design. White-collar unions gained power across Europe, and employee councils demanded more say in working conditions. The Dutch architect Herman Hertzberger's Centraal Beheer insurance building (1972) in Apeldoorn exemplified this shift. This remarkable structure comprised 56 interlocking "work islands" where teams of about a dozen workers could decorate their space as they wished, even bringing dogs to work. The project represented a democratic vision of office life where employees had both privacy and a sense of belonging. Perhaps the high point of this era came with Norwegian architect Niels Torp's design for Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) headquarters outside Stockholm in 1988. The building featured shops, restaurants, and coffee bars lining a solar-heated internal "main street" running through the entire complex. SAS president Jan Carlzon championed this approach, arguing: "Good ideas are rarely created when you are sitting at your desk feeling alone and tense, but during creative encounters between human beings." This represented a complete reversal of Taylorist principles. This social democratic office model reflected broader changes in post-war Europe, particularly the rising influence of social democratic governments and labor movements. Unlike the efficiency-obsessed Taylorist office, it acknowledged the need for social exchange and made workplaces more pleasant and respectable environments. While hierarchies weren't eliminated, they were softened and disguised within more humane surroundings. As this approach matured, it would inspire large multinational corporations to create elaborate, campus-like environments that continue to influence workplace design today.

Chapter 3: The Networked Office and Digital Transformation (1980-2000)

The period from 1980 to 2000 saw the modern office undergo another profound transformation as digital technology revolutionized work processes. By the turn of the millennium, the office was struggling to accommodate fast-changing patterns of knowledge work. The networked office emerged as a response to these challenges, repositioning the office building as one node in a dynamic organizational network rather than a static artifact standing alone. The key catalyst for this transformation was the rapid growth of digital technology. Personal computers replaced typewriters on desks, while networked systems began connecting workers both within and beyond the office building. As the commercial internet exploded in popularity during the 1990s, workers gained unprecedented mobility. Office design had to adapt to this new reality where information could flow freely across time and space. Knowledge work itself was evolving. Peter Drucker had first coined the term "knowledge worker" in 1960, but it wasn't until the 1980s and 1990s that organizations began seriously grappling with how to design workplaces for people whose primary contribution was intellectual rather than manual. Knowledge workers needed different environments for different tasks – spaces for focused individual work, collaboration, learning, and social interaction. This led to the development of "activity-based working" concepts, where employees could choose from various settings based on their current task. The smart or intelligent building emerged during this period, with advanced systems for security, climate control, and connectivity. Technology convergence, standardization of networks, and early wireless capabilities gave buildings new capabilities. However, many early smart building implementations focused more on cost savings than enhancing the human experience, leading to environments where workers felt increasingly controlled and monitored. Perhaps the most significant development was the emergence of coworking in the late 1990s, a concept that would flourish in the next century. The first coworking spaces were created to bring remote workers and freelancers together, out of isolation, while sharing the rent of larger spaces. This movement represented a critique of traditional corporate workplaces that placed little priority on service, community, and purpose. By 2000, the stage was set for a more fluid concept of office work. The networked office combined physical and virtual dimensions, was responsive to demand rather than focused solely on property supply, and offered greater flexibility to adapt to business volatility. It signaled a fundamental shift away from the efficiency-focused Taylorist model and the community-centered social democratic approach toward something more adaptable and distributed – a harbinger of even greater changes to come.

Chapter 4: The Experience-Driven Workplace (2000-2015)

Between 2000 and 2015, a remarkable shift occurred in workplace philosophy. For the first time in the century-long history of the modern office, the experience of the people working in these spaces began to receive serious consideration. This represented a dramatic departure from previous eras when management was concerned primarily with efficiency and productivity, giving little thought to how employees felt about their environment. Silicon Valley tech companies led this revolution, creating workplaces that prioritized user experience, comfort, and enjoyment. Google became famous for its playful campuses featuring slides, nap pods, free food, and recreation areas. These weren't just quirky additions but reflected a strategic understanding that in the knowledge economy, attracting and retaining top talent required creating places where people actually wanted to spend time. As competition for skilled workers intensified, the workplace itself became a recruiting tool and an expression of company culture. Workplace design began incorporating elements from other fields like retail, hospitality, and residential design. Office interiors featured café areas, comfortable lounges, and spaces that felt more like living rooms than traditional workstations. Boundaries between work and life blurred as companies provided amenities that encouraged employees to stay longer – from gourmet cafeterias to fitness centers and entertainment spaces. The guiding philosophy was that if employees enjoyed being at work, they would be more creative, collaborative, and productive. Biophilic design – incorporating natural elements like plants, natural light, and outdoor views – gained prominence during this period. Research demonstrated that connection to nature improved well-being, reduced stress, and enhanced cognitive function. Companies like Amazon would later take this concept to extremes with projects like The Spheres in Seattle – three interconnected biodomes filled with over 40,000 plants, creating an indoor rainforest for employees to work, meet, and find inspiration. The rise of coworking spaces like WeWork further accelerated this focus on experience. These spaces succeeded by offering not just flexible desk space but carefully curated environments that fostered community and provided superior service. Many corporate organizations began emulating these models, recognizing that their traditional office environments couldn't compete with the vibrant, hospitality-driven alternatives emerging in the market. By 2015, forward-thinking organizations had recognized that workplace experience was a strategic business consideration. The old efficiency-centered workplace, with its focus on squeezing productivity from workers in standardized environments, was giving way to a more nuanced understanding that engaged, inspired employees would drive innovation and growth. This shift would be tested and accelerated in the years to come as even greater disruptions loomed on the horizon.

Chapter 5: The Hybrid Office and Post-Pandemic Transformation (2015-Present)

The period from 2015 to the present has witnessed perhaps the most dramatic transformation in office history, culminating in the global pandemic that fundamentally altered our relationship with the workplace. Before 2020, hybrid working was already emerging as innovative companies experimented with flexible arrangements, allowing employees to split time between office and remote locations. Technology had advanced to the point where many knowledge workers could effectively perform their duties from anywhere with a good internet connection. Then came COVID-19, triggering an involuntary global experiment in remote working that accelerated workplace evolution by a decade virtually overnight. In March 2020, millions of office workers were suddenly sent home, forcing organizations to rapidly implement digital tools and practices they had previously approached with caution. Video conferencing, cloud collaboration, and digital workflows became the norm rather than the exception. After the initial shock, many organizations discovered that remote work could be remarkably effective for certain tasks. As the pandemic stretched from weeks into months and eventually years, a new paradigm began to emerge. Rather than a binary choice between office and home, work became understood as an activity rather than a place. This led to the concept of "hybrid work" – a fluid model where employees divide their time between multiple locations based on the nature of their tasks, team needs, and personal preferences. Most surveys showed that while workers valued the flexibility of remote work, they also missed the social connection and collaborative energy of the office. The physical office didn't disappear but underwent a profound reinvention. Companies began reconfiguring spaces to support what offices do best – enabling collaboration, fostering culture, and facilitating social connections. Individual workstations gave way to more meeting rooms, project spaces, and social areas. Many organizations reduced their real estate footprint, creating more dynamic, experience-focused environments designed to draw people in rather than contain them for fixed hours. Technology evolved to support this new reality, with platforms designed to create "digital equality" between in-person and remote participants. Smart building systems incorporated touchless interfaces, environmental monitoring, and space reservation tools. Mobile apps emerged to help employees navigate hybrid work, from booking desks and meeting rooms to coordinating in-office days with teammates. What we're witnessing isn't simply a reaction to a health crisis but a fundamental recalibration of the relationship between employers and employees. Workers have gained more autonomy over when, where, and how they work, while organizations have become more focused on results rather than time spent at a desk. This shift represents the culmination of a century-long journey from the rigid efficiency of Taylorism toward a more human-centered approach to work.

Chapter 6: Technology and the Sentient Workplace

The office of today and tomorrow is increasingly defined by digital technology that makes physical spaces more responsive, adaptive, and personalized. We've moved from an analog world where work centered around physical artifacts – paper documents, filing cabinets, landline phones – to a digital realm where cloud computing, wireless connectivity, and portable devices have untethered us from fixed locations. This technological revolution is transforming the workplace into a sentient environment that can sense, respond to, and even anticipate human needs. The Internet of Things (IoT) represents a pivotal development in this evolution. By embedding sensors throughout the workplace, buildings can gather data about occupancy, temperature, light levels, air quality, and usage patterns. This information flows into sophisticated analytics systems that generate insights about how spaces are actually being used versus how they were designed to be used. The "digital twin" – a virtual replica of the physical environment – allows facility managers to visualize these patterns and make data-driven decisions about space optimization. Artificial intelligence is increasingly central to workplace technology. AI algorithms can predict meeting patterns, recommend optimal spaces for specific activities, and even suggest potential collaborations between employees based on their skills and projects. As machine learning systems process more workplace data, they become better at identifying inefficiencies and opportunities for improvement. Some companies are exploring how AI can create personalized workplace experiences tailored to individual preferences – adjusting lighting, temperature, and even background noise to each person's optimal working conditions. Mobile apps have become the primary interface between people and their work environments. These applications allow employees to reserve desks, locate colleagues, navigate buildings, control environmental settings, and access building services. The smartphone essentially functions as a remote control for the office, giving users unprecedented control over their surroundings. This democratization of environmental control represents a dramatic shift from earlier eras when facilities management made centralized decisions about workplace conditions. Extended reality technologies – including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) – are beginning to influence how we experience and interact with workplaces. VR enables immersive remote collaboration, allowing distributed teams to meet in virtual spaces that simulate the feeling of being together. AR overlays digital information onto the physical environment, enabling new forms of wayfinding, training, and technical support. As these technologies mature, the boundaries between physical and digital workspaces will continue to blur. The sentient workplace raises important questions about privacy, autonomy, and the ethics of workplace monitoring. The same systems that can enhance employee experience can also enable surveillance, tracking movement, interactions, and productivity metrics in ways that might feel intrusive. Organizations implementing these technologies face the challenge of balancing the benefits of data-driven optimization with respect for personal boundaries and trust. The most successful approaches involve transparency about data collection and giving employees control over their digital footprint in the workplace.

Chapter 7: The Future of Work: Unworking and Reinvention

The reinvention of the modern office isn't simply about redesigning physical spaces or implementing new technologies – it requires fundamentally rethinking the very concept of work itself. This process, which might be called "unworking," involves challenging century-old assumptions about how, when, and where work should happen. It means dismantling rigid structures that no longer serve us and creating more flexible, human-centered approaches aligned with contemporary values and technologies. Central to this reinvention is a shift from standardization to personalization. The one-size-fits-all approach of traditional offices – where everyone gets the same desk, chair, and schedule regardless of their role, preferences, or work style – is giving way to more diverse, adaptable environments. Forward-thinking organizations recognize that people have different optimal conditions for different types of work. Some tasks require deep focus and solitude, while others benefit from collaboration and social energy. The future workplace will provide a variety of settings to support this full spectrum of activities. Work itself is becoming more fluid and less bound by conventional time constraints. The pandemic demonstrated that strict adherence to the 9-to-5 schedule is unnecessary for many knowledge workers. Asynchronous work – where team members contribute at different times rather than simultaneously – is gaining acceptance as organizations become more globally distributed. This shift acknowledges that people have different chronotypes and energy patterns throughout the day. Peak productivity might come at 7 AM for some and 7 PM for others. By loosening temporal constraints, companies can allow employees to work when they're at their best. Leadership approaches are evolving alongside these changes. Command-and-control management styles that assumed workers needed constant supervision are giving way to more trust-based models focused on outcomes rather than activities. Leaders are learning to manage distributed teams by setting clear goals and expectations while giving people autonomy over how they achieve them. This requires developing new skills in digital collaboration, virtual team building, and remote coaching. Technology will continue to reshape work in profound ways, but its highest purpose should be enhancing human capabilities rather than replacing them. Artificial intelligence and automation will increasingly handle routine tasks, freeing people to focus on more creative, strategic, and interpersonal aspects of their roles. The most valuable human skills will be those machines can't easily replicate – empathy, creativity, ethical judgment, and complex problem-solving. Perhaps most importantly, the reinvention of work offers an opportunity to create more balanced, sustainable, and fulfilling relationships between our professional and personal lives. The rigid boundaries that once separated these domains are dissolving, allowing for more integrated approaches that acknowledge people as whole humans with responsibilities and interests beyond their jobs. By designing work around human needs rather than forcing humans to adapt to arbitrary work structures, we can create systems that support both productivity and well-being.

Summary

The evolution of the modern office over the past century reveals a clear trajectory from rigid efficiency to human experience. What began as an industrial approach to white-collar work – with Frederick Taylor's stopwatch monitoring clerks arranged in orderly rows – has gradually given way to more nuanced understandings of how environments affect human performance, creativity, and well-being. Each era's office design reflected broader social values and technological capabilities, from the command-and-control hierarchy of early 20th century capitalism to the democratic impulses of post-war Europe to the digital transformation of recent decades. This historical perspective offers valuable insights for navigating our current moment of workplace reinvention. First, it reminds us that the office has always been in flux, adapting to changing economic and social conditions. Rather than clinging to familiar models out of habit or tradition, organizations should embrace the opportunity to reimagine work for a new era. Second, it suggests that the most successful workplaces will be those that balance multiple needs – providing spaces for focused individual work, collaborative engagement, social connection, and learning. Finally, it underscores the importance of human agency in workplace design. As technology gives us more options for when, where, and how to work, the most important question becomes not what is most efficient, but what best enables people to thrive and contribute their unique talents. By understanding this history, we can create workplaces that learn from the past while embracing the possibilities of the future.

About Author

Loading...

Jeremy Myerson

Read more