What Every Angel Investor Wants You to Know

What Every Angel Investor Wants You to Know Plot Summary

Introduction

I still remember that pivotal moment in my entrepreneurial journey when I faced five angel investors across a polished boardroom table. My heart raced as I delivered my pitch for a tech startup I'd poured my soul into for two years. The silence that followed felt eternal. Then, one investor leaned forward and asked a question that changed everything: "Tell me why you're the one who can make this vision real?" It wasn't about my financial projections or market analysis—it was about me. That day, I learned that angel investing is fundamentally about human connection before capital exchange. This human-centered approach to early-stage funding represents a profound shift in how entrepreneurs and investors interact in the modern business landscape. Throughout these pages, we'll explore the intimate dance between those with ideas and those with capital, revealing how successful partnerships form when both sides understand each other's true motivations. Whether you're an entrepreneur seeking funding or an investor looking to back the next breakthrough venture, the insights ahead will illuminate how authentic relationships, thorough preparation, and strategic alignment create the foundation for startup success.

Chapter 1: The Entrepreneur-Angel Dynamic: Building Relationships That Matter

When Ben Silbermann was developing what would become Pinterest, he faced numerous rejections from potential investors. The visual discovery platform wasn't immediately obvious to many, but Brian Cohen saw something special—not just in the concept, but in Ben himself. "I didn't invest in Pinterest," Cohen often explains. "I invested in Ben." This simple statement encapsulates the essence of angel investing: it's about the person first, the product second. Cohen recalls spending hours with Ben, discussing not just business models but personal values and vision. Their meetings often took place over casual meals where conversation flowed naturally beyond pitch decks and projections. During one particularly memorable dinner, Ben shared stories about his childhood collection of insects pinned to display boards—an early manifestation of his desire to help people discover and organize things they love. This human connection gave Cohen the confidence to become Pinterest's first investor, well before the platform's value was obvious to others. The relationship continued beyond the initial investment. When technical challenges arose, Cohen didn't just offer capital—he offered connections to engineering talent. When marketing questions emerged, he provided introductions to potential partners. The investment became a partnership built on mutual respect and complementary strengths. This entrepreneur-angel dynamic represents a stark contrast to later-stage investment relationships. Angels typically work directly with founders, offering not just money but mentorship, network access, and operational guidance. As Tom Patterson, founder of Tommy John underwear, discovered, his angel investors became his most passionate product evangelists, wearing his innovative undergarments and enthusiastically telling others about them at every opportunity. For entrepreneurs, understanding this relationship-first approach transforms how they prepare for investor meetings. Rather than focusing exclusively on financial projections, smart founders invest time researching potential angels' backgrounds, investment philosophies, and areas of expertise. They prepare questions about how the investor might contribute beyond capital, demonstrating they value wisdom as much as wealth. The most successful entrepreneur-angel relationships evolve into partnerships that transcend traditional investment frameworks. They become collaborative journeys where both parties bring their full selves—their knowledge, networks, and narratives—to create something neither could build alone. This human connection forms the foundation upon which truly transformative ventures are built, reminding us that behind every successful startup stands not just smart money, but a meaningful relationship between those who dream and those who help make dreams real.

Chapter 2: Due Diligence: What Angels Look For Before Writing Checks

When Lily Liu approached the New York Angels with her civic engagement platform PublicStuff, she arrived with more than just a compelling pitch. She brought comprehensive documentation of her traction: contracts with three municipalities, detailed user engagement metrics, and testimonials from city managers. This preparation impressed Brian Cohen, but what truly distinguished Liu was her response when asked about potential weaknesses in her business model. Instead of defensive posturing, she candidly addressed the challenges of municipal sales cycles and presented her mitigation strategy. This transparency, combined with her thorough preparation, ultimately secured investment from 18 angels—an exceptional outcome for any startup. Liu's experience illustrates the dual nature of due diligence: it's both a verification process and a character assessment. Smart angels aren't just validating claims; they're evaluating founders' integrity, self-awareness, and ability to navigate uncertainty. One New York angel recounts how he once verified a founder's educational credentials only to discover fabricated degrees. The deception immediately terminated investment discussions—not because formal education was required, but because honesty was non-negotiable. The most sophisticated angels have developed structured approaches to due diligence. David Rose of New York Angels employs what he calls "concentric circles of trust," beginning with the team's backgrounds and expanding outward to market validation, intellectual property protection, and financial projections. Each circle must prove solid before proceeding to the next. This methodical approach explains why angels spend an average of 7-40 hours on due diligence per investment, with research showing a direct correlation between time invested in this process and portfolio returns. Technical due diligence varies significantly by industry. For SaaS startups, angels often request GitHub access to evaluate code quality. For consumer products, they may test prototypes or interview potential customers. Gabriel Weinberg, angel investor and DuckDuckGo founder, emphasizes "customer due diligence" above all else: "I want to speak with actual users who aren't friends or family of the founders. Their unfiltered feedback tells me more about product-market fit than any pitch deck." For founders, understanding this process transforms due diligence from an interrogation into an opportunity. The most successful entrepreneurs anticipate investors' questions, preparing comprehensive data rooms before they're requested. They introduce angels to customers without cherry-picking only the most enthusiastic. They voluntarily disclose potential problems rather than waiting for investors to discover them. This proactive transparency builds trust and demonstrates maturity. Ultimately, due diligence serves as the foundation upon which lasting entrepreneur-investor relationships are built. It's not merely about verifying facts but establishing mutual understanding and alignment. The most valuable outcome isn't simply a check—it's the creation of a partnership grounded in shared reality and reciprocal trust, setting the stage for the challenges and triumphs that inevitably lie ahead on the startup journey.

Chapter 3: The Perfect Pitch: Captivating Angels with Your Vision

Patrick Ambron, CEO of BrandYourself, had been rejected by every angel investor on his target list. Yet instead of moving on, he did something remarkable—he stayed in touch. Every few weeks, he sent brief updates highlighting progress: new customers, product improvements, and key milestones. Occasionally, he'd ask for specific advice on challenges they were facing. This persistent, value-focused communication transformed initial rejections into relationships. When BrandYourself launched its Series A round months later, every angel who had initially declined was now eager to invest. Ambron hadn't just pitched a product; he'd demonstrated the resilience and relationship-building capability that angels recognize as essential to entrepreneurial success. The perfect pitch begins long before entering any meeting room. When David Steinberger pitched his digital comics platform comiXology to Cohen, he arrived having thoroughly researched Cohen's background as a lifelong comic collector. This personal connection transformed their meeting from a transaction into a conversation between enthusiasts. When Steinberger demonstrated how comiXology would revolutionize comic distribution, Cohen could immediately envision the potential—not just intellectually but emotionally. The investment decision followed naturally from this shared vision. Angel investor Linda Holliday emphasizes that pitching is essentially auditioning for a role. She recalls advising a female entrepreneur who arrived in formal corporate attire—black dress, stockings, pumps, and pearls. "You're reinforcing your corporate origins instead of showing what you want to become," Holliday explained. "Dress for the role you're seeking, not the one you're leaving." This attention to non-verbal communication applies equally to presentation style. Angels consistently report that founders who speak confidently without reading from notes, maintain eye contact, and demonstrate genuine passion significantly outperform those with technically superior but emotionally flat presentations. The structure of effective pitches follows a consistent pattern: begin with the problem, demonstrate the solution, establish market size, explain the business model, introduce the team, outline the competitive landscape, and conclude with a specific ask. However, within this framework, David Rose, known as "The Pitch Coach," recommends a counterintuitive approach: "Never, ever look at the screen. The attention needs to be on you." The founder, not the slides, must remain the focus—a principle that Steve Jobs mastered in his legendary product launches. What often distinguishes successful pitches isn't technical perfection but emotional intelligence. Effective founders demonstrate awareness of the room's energy, adapting their pace and emphasis accordingly. They anticipate objections rather than responding defensively when challenged. They balance confidence with coachability, conveying both conviction in their vision and openness to guidance. Most importantly, they recognize that the pitch isn't just about securing capital—it's the beginning of a potential multi-year relationship. The perfect pitch thus represents far more than a polished presentation. It's a demonstration of the founder's ability to communicate effectively, build relationships, and inspire others to join their journey—precisely the skills needed to recruit teams, attract customers, and navigate the inevitable challenges of startup life. In this way, the pitch serves as both audition and preview, showing angels not just what the business might become, but who the entrepreneur already is.

Chapter 4: Team Building: Creating a Startup Others Want to Back

When Dan Kador launched Keen IO, a mobile analytics startup, he didn't just partner with talented strangers—he founded the company with Ryan Spraetz and Kyle Wild, friends from high school who had subsequently studied engineering together at the University of Illinois. The trio had shared a house in San Francisco while working at different tech companies, spending countless evenings discussing startup ideas. By the time they submitted their application to TechStars, they had developed not just complementary technical skills but an intuitive understanding of each other's working styles, stress responses, and communication preferences. This deep foundation allowed them to navigate the intense pressures of startup life without fracturing their team dynamic. Angels consistently prioritize team quality above all other investment criteria. Brian Cohen articulates what many investors instinctively recognize: "If you give me a choice between an 'A' team with a 'B' idea, and a 'B' team with an 'A' idea, I'll take the 'A' team every day of the week." This isn't merely sentiment—it reflects practical reality. Products pivot, markets shift, and business models evolve, but a cohesive, adaptable team remains the constant factor in navigating these changes successfully. The composition of winning teams follows discernible patterns. Complementary skills prove essential—the technical co-founder who builds the product, the business co-founder who sells it, and often a domain expert who understands the market intimately. Yet skill diversity alone proves insufficient. The most successful teams demonstrate what Cohen calls "teammanship"—a shared identity and value system that transcends individual contributions. This manifests in how founders interact during presentations, completing each other's thoughts while respectfully acknowledging individual expertise. History together matters enormously. Teams with pre-existing relationships—whether as colleagues, classmates, or friends—statistically outperform those assembled specifically for a venture. This shared history creates a foundation of trust that allows for honest communication during inevitable challenges. As one angel investor observed watching a founding team debate strategy during due diligence: "I wasn't evaluating their conclusion as much as their process for reaching it. Their ability to disagree productively told me everything about their capacity to solve problems together." Resilience emerges as perhaps the most crucial team characteristic. David Tisch, TechStars founder, notes that successful teams approach setbacks differently: "They don't just bounce back; they extract learning that makes them stronger." This adaptive capacity often correlates with what psychologists call "psychological safety"—an environment where team members feel comfortable taking risks, admitting mistakes, and challenging assumptions without fear of embarrassment or retribution. Teams demonstrating this quality typically outperform those with objectively stronger credentials but lower emotional intelligence. For entrepreneurs, understanding angels' team focus transforms how they approach investor meetings. Smart founders ensure every team member participates meaningfully in presentations, demonstrating not just individual expertise but collective capability. They openly acknowledge gaps in their team composition rather than pretending to universal competence. Most importantly, they recognize that team building isn't just about assembling talent—it's about creating an organizational culture that attracts and retains exceptional people over time, building a foundation strong enough to weather the inevitable storms of startup life.

Chapter 5: Exit Strategies: Baking in the End Game from Day One

Lee Lin founded RentHop with a bold vision to disrupt the rental brokerage industry by eliminating intermediaries. Before writing a single line of code, he took an unusual step: he became a rental broker himself, spending two months in the trenches showing apartments in Queens. This immersive experience revealed something unexpected—rental brokers weren't simply unnecessary middlemen; they provided genuine value in qualifying properties and streamlining transactions. Rather than pursuing his original disintermediation strategy, Lin pivoted RentHop to build technology that improved broker effectiveness instead of replacing them. This fundamental shift positioned the company for eventual acquisition by a major real estate technology platform—an exit that might never have materialized had Lin stubbornly pursued his initial vision. Successful angels recognize that the only way they realize returns is through exits—either acquisitions or IPOs—and they expect founders to share this perspective from day one. This expectation often creates tension with entrepreneurs who resist discussing exits during early fundraising, feeling it demonstrates insufficient commitment to their vision. "Exit strategy? We haven't even started the company yet, and you're talking about selling it?" This resistance misunderstands the angel's perspective: planning for an exit doesn't diminish commitment; it demonstrates strategic foresight. The statistics support this early focus. Research by Basil Peters, angel investor and author of Early Exits, reveals that startups that explicitly plan for acquisition from inception statistically achieve faster, more lucrative exits than those that treat exits as distant eventualities. Companies acquired while still relatively small (under $30 million) typically command higher multiples and face fewer regulatory hurdles than larger enterprises. Additionally, smaller acquisitions require fewer approvals within acquiring organizations, significantly expanding the pool of potential buyers. Tom Patterson, founder of Tommy John underwear, incorporated exit planning into his earliest business decisions. When choosing manufacturing partners, he prioritized those with capacity to scale production tenfold, anticipating acquirer expectations. When developing financial systems, he implemented enterprise-grade controls that would withstand acquisition due diligence. When building his team, he created clear documentation of roles and responsibilities to facilitate integration with a larger organization. These decisions, made years before any acquisition discussions, ultimately enabled a smooth, profitable exit when a major apparel conglomerate came calling. For entrepreneurs, incorporating exit planning changes daily decision-making. It influences everything from corporate structure (C-corps generally preferred for acquisitions) to intellectual property protection (rigorous documentation required) to financial reporting (adopting GAAP accounting earlier than legally required). The most sophisticated founders identify potential acquirers during their earliest planning stages, then systematically build relationships with these companies through industry events, strategic partnerships, and mutual connections. The paradox of successful exit planning is that it often makes exits unnecessary. Companies built with the discipline, transparency, and strategic focus that acquisition readiness requires frequently become profitable enough that founders can choose whether to exit or continue independently. This optionality represents the ultimate entrepreneurial freedom—the ability to determine your company's future based on opportunity rather than necessity, creating leverage that leads to better outcomes regardless of which path you ultimately choose.

Chapter 6: Investor Raising vs Money Raising: Finding Smart Capital

When Lily Liu of PublicStuff faced an enviable dilemma—18 angels competing to invest in her civic engagement platform—she did something remarkable. Instead of maximizing her funding round, she interviewed each potential investor, asking pointedly: "Why should I take your money over someone else's?" This question startled many investors accustomed to entrepreneurs gratefully accepting any available capital. But Liu wasn't raising money; she was raising investors. She ultimately selected four angels whose municipal government experience, technical background, and network connections precisely matched PublicStuff's needs. This selective approach transformed her capital from a commodity into a strategic resource, accelerating the company's growth and eventual acquisition. Jeffrey Pulver, an early Twitter investor and prolific angel, articulates the distinction between investor raising and money raising succinctly: "The best gift you can give entrepreneurs is to believe in them." This belief manifests not just in capital but in ongoing engagement that amplifies the investment's impact. When Pulver backed a speech recognition startup facing technical challenges, he didn't just provide additional funding—he personally introduced the founders to three world-class voice recognition experts from his network, transforming a potential company-ending obstacle into a competitive advantage. This value creation dramatically exceeds what capital alone could have achieved. For entrepreneurs, adopting an investor-raising mindset requires fundamental shifts in approach. Rather than maximizing valuation or minimizing dilution, the focus becomes identifying investors whose expertise, networks, and mentorship capabilities align with specific company needs. This often means conducting reverse due diligence on potential angels—researching their previous investments, interviewing founders they've backed, and evaluating their relevant industry knowledge. Smart entrepreneurs prepare questions about how investors might contribute beyond capital, signaling they value wisdom alongside wealth. The investor-raising approach also transforms ongoing investor relations. Instead of quarterly updates focused solely on metrics, savvy founders engage angels with specific requests that leverage their unique capabilities: "Could you introduce us to potential channel partners in the healthcare sector?" or "Would you review our enterprise sales strategy based on your experience scaling B2B companies?" This targeted engagement maximizes investor contributions while demonstrating the founder's strategic thinking. Patrick Ambron of BrandYourself exemplifies this approach through his investor communication strategy. Rather than generic updates, he sends tailored messages highlighting specific challenges where particular investors might contribute: "Given your background in conversion optimization, I'd appreciate your thoughts on our onboarding redesign." This targeted approach transformed his investor relationships from passive capital sources into active strategic partnerships, creating significant competitive advantage. The investor-raising mindset ultimately creates a virtuous cycle. Angels who feel their contributions extend beyond capital tend to increase their engagement, introduce additional valuable connections, and participate in follow-on rounds. This support provides both tangible resources and intangible benefits—the psychological reinforcement that comes from having experienced partners who've navigated similar challenges before. In startup journeys filled with uncertainty, this relationship-centered approach provides not just smart capital but something equally valuable—the confidence that comes from knowing you're not navigating the entrepreneurial wilderness alone.

Chapter 7: Going Belly to Belly: Understanding Your Customer's Needs

A college student developing a wedding planning platform stood nervously outside Kleinfeld Bridal in Manhattan, approaching brides-to-be with survey questions about their planning challenges. When the store manager emerged to investigate this unauthorized market research, the student explained his startup concept. Rather than being ejected, he received an unexpected response: an invitation inside to discuss wedding industry pain points with the person who encountered them daily. That two-hour conversation yielded insights no online research could have provided, along with an influential industry adviser. This "belly to belly" customer interaction transformed a vague concept into a targeted solution addressing real market needs. Clayton Christensen, Harvard professor and author of The Innovator's Dilemma, shares a revealing story about customer understanding. His consulting company was hired by a fast-food chain to increase milkshake sales. Traditional market research—focus groups, taste tests, demographic analysis—had yielded no improvements. Christensen's team took a different approach: they simply observed customers purchasing milkshakes. They discovered something unexpected—nearly half were bought before 8:00 AM by commuters seeking something they could consume one-handed during their morning drive. These customers weren't hiring milkshakes for their flavor; they wanted something filling enough to postpone hunger and lasting enough to combat boredom during long commutes. Armed with this insight, the chain developed thicker morning milkshakes with chunks of fruit, creating a product that actually solved the job customers were "hiring" it to perform. This jobs-to-be-done framework represents a fundamental shift in customer understanding. Rather than asking what features customers want, it investigates what outcomes they're trying to achieve. Tom Patterson discovered this when developing Tommy John underwear. Men didn't explicitly request horizontal flys or quick-draw pouches, but they universally complained about bunching, riding up, and discomfort. By observing rather than merely surveying potential customers, Patterson identified unmet needs his competitors had overlooked, creating product innovations that commanded premium pricing and eventual retail distribution. For angels, evidence of belly-to-belly customer engagement significantly reduces perceived investment risk. When entrepreneurs demonstrate firsthand knowledge of customer behaviors—not just preferences stated in surveys—investors gain confidence that product development decisions rest on solid foundations rather than assumptions. This explains why angels consistently prioritize teams who have immersed themselves in their customers' environments over those relying primarily on secondary research. The digital era offers unprecedented tools for customer understanding—analytics platforms, heat maps, user testing—but the most successful entrepreneurs combine these quantitative insights with qualitative immersion. Patrick Ambron of BrandYourself spent weeks personally handling customer service inquiries before building the company's automated reputation management platform. This direct engagement revealed emotional patterns driving customer decisions that no data analysis could have uncovered, fundamentally reshaping the product's positioning and messaging. The paradox of customer understanding is that genuinely innovative products often address needs customers themselves cannot articulate. As Henry Ford supposedly remarked, "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." True innovation requires entrepreneurs to synthesize observed behaviors, technological possibilities, and market trends into solutions customers couldn't imagine but immediately recognize as valuable. This synthesis emerges not from distance but from intimacy—from going belly to belly with customers to understand not just what they say they want, but what they truly need.

Summary

Throughout these chapters, we've witnessed how successful angel investing transcends simple financial transactions, becoming instead a deeply human endeavor built on relationships, understanding, and mutual growth. From Brian Cohen's investment in Ben Silbermann based on personal connection rather than Pinterest's initial metrics, to Lily Liu's strategic selection of investors for PublicStuff, the recurring theme emerges clearly: the most valuable capital combines financial resources with relevant expertise, meaningful connections, and genuine mentorship. The entrepreneurial journey is inherently uncertain, filled with pivots, setbacks, and unexpected opportunities. This reality explains why angels consistently prioritize resilient teams over perfect plans, why due diligence focuses on character as much as credentials, and why successful exits begin with strategic foresight rather than opportunistic reactions. For entrepreneurs navigating this landscape, the key insights remain surprisingly consistent: know your customers intimately through direct engagement; build teams united by complementary skills and shared values; approach investors as strategic partners rather than funding sources; and maintain the flexibility to evolve while staying true to your core mission. By embracing these principles, founders create not just innovative products but enduring companies worthy of the faith angels place in them—transforming bold visions into tangible realities that benefit investors, entrepreneurs, and the broader communities they serve.

About Author

Loading...

Brian Cohen

Read more