What I Learned Losing a Million Dollars

What I Learned Losing a Million Dollars Plot Summary

Introduction

Have you ever noticed how some successful people seem to suddenly lose everything after years of winning? A CEO who turned around a struggling company, then made a catastrophic decision that sank it. An investor who tripled his money for years, then bet it all on one position and went broke. These aren't just unfortunate accidents - they're part of a predictable pattern that affects decision-makers across all fields. This book tells the remarkable story of Jim Paul, who rose from humble beginnings to become a governor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and a millionaire trader, only to lose it all in just 75 days. Through his painful journey, we discover a counterintuitive truth: success itself can be the greatest setup for catastrophic failure. Most books focus on how to make money, but Paul's experience reveals something far more valuable - understanding the psychology that causes us to lose money, and how to prevent those losses in the first place. You'll learn why personalizing market positions and decisions leads to disaster, how to maintain emotional discipline through both gains and losses, and most importantly, the power of having a well-defined plan before entering any risk-taking endeavor.

Chapter 1: The Rise: How Early Success Built a Dangerous Ego

Jim Paul's first encounter with money and status came at age nine when he began caddying at Summit Hills Country Club near Elsmere, Kentucky. While his father earned just $4,000-$5,000 annually as a surveyor, Jim found himself exposed to a world of wealth he never knew existed. He would caddy for men like Charlie Robkey, who drove a Cadillac Eldorado convertible with his beautiful blonde wife by his side. "Self, I like what Charlie's got, and I think I want to do what Charlie's doing," young Jim thought. "I don't want to drive a Chevrolet like my folks. I'd like to have an Eldorado like Charlie." Through his teenage years, Jim worked various jobs to pay his way through school, from caddying to running a golf-driving range, busing tables, and working at a service station. At seventeen, he bought his first car - a '53 Mercury - with his own saved money. He later sold it to help pay for college at the University of Kentucky. In college, Jim continued breaking rules yet succeeding. When rushing a fraternity, rather than waiting to be invited to join, he called the chapter president directly and said, "My buddy Jim Hersha and I are going through rush and, frankly, we're a little tired of going to all these parties... We'd like to come over to the house and pick up our pledge pins." Remarkably, they got in despite completely violating the normal protocol. This pattern continued throughout his early career. After college and military service, Jim entered the brokerage business. One potential employer gave him the Minnesota Study of Values Test. The night before, Jim found a book explaining exactly how to answer the questions to get the ideal "broker profile." He aced it perfectly - too perfectly, in fact. His test results came out in the shape of a butterfly, the ideal profile for a broker. When later confronted about this by a manager who said, "Nobody could do a perfect butterfly unless he knew exactly what I'm talking about," Jim admitted to studying for the test, but was hired anyway. These experiences reinforced Jim's growing belief that he was special - different from and better than others. Rules that applied to everyone else didn't seem to apply to him. He was promoted rapidly, made connections with powerful people, and eventually became a member of the Executive Committee at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange after just six months in Chicago. "I was 33 years old, looked like I was 25 and acted like I was 22, but I was on the Board of Governors," he recalls. This string of successes, many achieved by bending or breaking rules, created a dangerous ego inflation that would set the stage for his spectacular fall. The lesson became clear in retrospect: when you achieve success by breaking rules, you begin to think you're immune to the consequences of breaking those rules. You become convinced of your own exceptionalism. Each victory feeds this belief until you're operating with dangerous overconfidence, setting yourself up for inevitable disaster.

Chapter 2: The Fall: $1.6 Million Vanished in 75 Days

In the summer of 1983, Jim Paul and his trading partner Kirby Smith had become fixated on the soybean oil market. Smith, whom Jim considered brilliant, had convinced him that bean oil supplies were getting tight and prices would soon skyrocket. Jim not only believed this story but became its evangelist, convincing everyone he knew to get involved. "If you even thought you knew my name, you had bean oil spreads on," he recalls. "I called everybody: my brother, traders, friends, customers. My secretary heard me tell the story on the phone so many times she even opened an account and put five spreads on for herself." That August, Jim took his family on vacation, traveling in a rented forty-five foot motor home with a phone installed so he could keep up with the markets. One Thursday during the trip, they stopped at his partner Larry Broderick's lake house near Cleveland. The next day, the bean oil market exploded upward exactly as Jim had predicted. In one day, Jim made $248,000 personally, and his entire network of friends and clients collectively made nearly $700,000. "The high from 'being right' the market and making all that money is unbelievable," Jim recalls. "It cannot be duplicated with drugs. You are totally invincible. You are impervious to all pain. There's nothing bad in the world. It's literally like you expect God to call any minute and ask, 'Is it okay if I let the sun come up tomorrow morning?'" When Jim returned to Chicago, he was on top of the world. His office featured expensive custom furniture, including a special desk with a copper pedestal and a giant mahogany tabletop that appeared to be levitating. "When you walked into the office all you could see was carpet stretching out in front of you, a copper column rising up from the carpet and two pieces of wood levitating in mid-air, defying gravity. And that is just what I thought I was doing: defying gravity." But the market opened down that Monday morning, and what followed was a relentless, grinding decline. Jim lost $20,000 to $25,000 every day for months. While his clients wisely exited their positions, Jim stubbornly held on, convinced the market would turn around. "This was going to be The Big Trade. Smith and I were going to make $10 million on this trade," he remembers thinking. As losses mounted, Jim began receiving margin calls, borrowing money from friends to meet them. He lost weight, couldn't sleep, and began avoiding his family. By November, Jim was "under water big time" - down $700,000 to $800,000 from his August high, with $400,000 borrowed from friends. On November 17th, the brokerage firm finally forced liquidation of his positions. They seized his exchange membership, forcing his resignation from the Board of Governors. They took his furniture, his stereo, even his levitating desk. "I went from having everything on August 26th to nothing on November 17th," Jim says. In a drunken stupor that night, he briefly contemplated suicide, believing his life insurance might be the only way to provide for his family. The critical insight from Jim's collapse wasn't just about market timing or analysis. It was about psychology. When the bean oil position was profitable, Jim had completely personalized the success - it validated his brilliance. So when the position turned against him, he couldn't accept it as just a losing trade. That would mean accepting he was wrong, which his ego couldn't tolerate. Each day's continued losses led him deeper into denial, anger, bargaining, and depression - the classic stages of grief. Without an objective exit strategy established beforehand, his emotions kept him trapped in a deteriorating position until someone else finally pulled the plug.

Chapter 3: Internal vs. External Losses: Breaking the Personalization Trap

When examining his catastrophic loss, Jim made a crucial discovery: there are two fundamentally different types of losses - external and internal. External losses are objective and factual. If Kentucky loses a basketball game, that's an external loss - it's the same for everyone who watched the game. If you lose your car keys, that's an external loss. Money itself is external, so market losses should be external losses. Internal losses, however, are subjective and emotional - like the loss of self-esteem, respect, or love. These losses exist only in how we personally experience them. Jim observed that people often make a critical error: they transform external market losses into internal, personal losses. "Due to vocabulary quirks, it is easy to equate losing money in the market with being wrong," he explains. "In doing so, you take what had been a decision about money (external) and make it a matter of reputation and pride (internal)." Once this transformation occurs, your ego becomes involved in the market position. You begin taking the market personally, and the loss is no longer objective. This personalization explains one of the most common and destructive behaviors in investing: the tendency to quickly exit profitable positions while holding onto losing ones. It's as if profits and losses were a reflection of intelligence or self-worth. Taking a loss makes people feel stupid or wrong, so they avoid it at all costs. "They confuse net-worth with self-worth," Jim notes. This personalization was exactly what happened with his bean oil position - it wasn't just money anymore; it was his identity. Once a market position becomes personalized and shows a loss, people typically go through the same five stages that Elisabeth Kübler-Ross identified in terminally ill patients: denial ("This isn't really a loss"), anger (often directed at others), bargaining ("If it just gets back to breakeven, I'll get out"), depression, and finally acceptance. Jim experienced every stage during his bean oil disaster, starting with denial about how far underwater he was, directing anger at his family, bargaining that if the market just returned to August levels he'd exit, and falling into depression as losses mounted. The most dangerous aspect of market losses is that they result from a continuous process with no defined endpoint, unlike a discrete event like a basketball game that has a clear beginning and end. "In a continuous process, nothing forces you to acknowledge it as a loss; there's just you, your money and the market as a silent thief," Jim explains. This allows the cycle of denial to continue indefinitely, or at least until your money runs out. Breaking this cycle requires externalizing market positions and creating discrete endpoints through pre-defined exit points - essentially converting a dangerous continuous process into a safer discrete event.

Chapter 4: The Psychological Crowd: When Emotions Take Control

During the summer of 1980, Jim and his partner Larry received a hot tip about a rumored corporate takeover. The stock was trading at $25, but the broker said if the takeover happened, it would likely be at $60 within sixty days. They discovered that the call options at the $35 strike price were trading for just pennies, so they bought thousands of them and convinced everyone they knew to do the same. Within weeks, the stock climbed past $37, making their options tremendously profitable. Then one Friday afternoon, trading in the stock was halted - "news pending." Jim and his friends were ecstatic, assuming the takeover was happening. Over the weekend, they were so confident they'd be millionaires by Monday that one client called British Airways about renting the Concorde for a celebration trip to London. When Monday came, the stock reopened - down $6. The takeover had fallen through. Their options expired worthless. This experience exemplifies what Jim came to recognize as "crowd psychology" - a mental state that can affect even isolated individuals making decisions alone. French psychologist Gustave Le Bon identified three key characteristics of crowd psychology: a sentiment of invincible power, contagion of emotions, and high suggestibility. Jim exhibited all three during both his takeover stock and bean oil trades. He felt invincible, was emotionally swept along by price movements, and became highly suggestible to information supporting his position. "When an individual adheres to a market position despite mounting losses, he is a crowd," Jim explains. The hallmark of crowd psychology is that rational thinking gets replaced by emotional decision-making. This explains why people do things they said they wouldn't do, or fail to do things they said they would. In Jim's case, it explains why he stayed in the bean oil position long after any reasonable person would have exited, even borrowing money to maintain a losing position. Jim identifies two psychological models that describe how individuals become part of a "crowd" mentality. The "delusion model" describes the process before entering a position: expectant attention (eagerness to make money), suggestion (hearing a tip), contagion (enthusiasm spreads), and acceptance (acting on the suggestion). The "illusion model" describes what happens after entering a position: affirmation (expressing an opinion), repetition (telling others), prestige (looking smart when initially right), and contagion (becoming emotionally overwhelmed). The most dangerous aspect of crowd psychology involves the paradoxical relationship between hope and fear. When long a position and the market rises, you simultaneously hope it continues and fear it won't. If your fear is strong enough, you'll exit and then hope the market turns down. When long and the market falls, you hope it reverses but fear it won't. If your fear dominates, you'll exit and hope it keeps falling. This emotional tug-of-war occurs continuously, making objective decision-making nearly impossible without pre-established rules. Understanding crowd psychology provides a practical framework for avoiding emotionalism. Rather than trying to monitor yourself for dozens of different emotions, simply watch for signs that you're becoming part of the crowd - feeling invincible, being swept along by contagion, or becoming highly suggestible. "By avoiding the tell-tale symptoms which accompany becoming part of the crowd, you will automatically avoid emotionalism," Jim advises. This awareness is the first step toward making rational rather than emotional market decisions.

Chapter 5: The Plan: Think Before Acting, Define Your Exit First

Jim's devastating loss taught him that the single most critical element of market success is having a predetermined plan - particularly one that establishes exit criteria before entering a position. "The distinguishing factor of 'the' recipe is determining the stop loss criteria before deciding whether and where to enter the market," he explains. This approach runs completely counter to how most people operate; they enter positions first, then maybe think about where they might exit if things go badly. When examining successful professionals across different markets, Jim found they used vastly different approaches. Some were fundamental analysts, others technical. Some diversified widely, others concentrated positions. Some averaged down, others never did. Some tried to pick tops and bottoms, others rode trends. Despite these contradictions, they all shared one trait: they knew how to control losses. The pros considered it their primary responsibility not to lose money. The key insight is that without a predetermined plan, you leave yourself vulnerable to uncertainty and emotional decision-making. Market positions are continuous processes with no natural endpoint, unlike discrete events like card games that end after each hand. Without defining your own endpoints through exit criteria, you subject yourself to the psychological distortions that led to Jim's downfall. He realized that a proper trading plan must be derived in this order: STOP, ENTRY, then PRICE OBJECTIVE. First, determine under what conditions or at what price you would no longer want the position. This forces you to acknowledge the possibility of being wrong before your ego becomes involved. Next, determine where you're comfortable entering the market, with your entry point being a function of your exit point. Only after these two steps should you consider your profit objective. "Failure to choose a price objective could cost the trader some potential profits. A poor entry price could increase losses or reduce profits. But not having a predetermined stop-loss can, and ultimately will, cost you a lot of money," Jim emphasizes. This approach creates several benefits. It prevents the dangerous cycle of the Five Stages of Internal Loss by going straight to acceptance. It converts a continuous process into a discrete event with a defined endpoint. It keeps you from gambling or betting on a continuous process. Most importantly, it imposes discipline over emotions, preventing you from making crowd-based decisions. "If you don't have control of your emotions via a plan, then your decision-making will be based on emotions," Jim warns. The plan must be committed to writing. "To prevent unintentional and implicit violation of your plan, no device is more effective than setting down that plan before your eyes explicitly in black and white," Jim advises. Writing objectifies and externalizes your thinking, holding you accountable. This approach isn't just for markets - it applies to all decision-making involving risk and uncertainty. Even in military operations and business ventures, defining "exit criteria" before committing resources is essential for preventing disastrous outcomes caused by psychological factors.

Chapter 6: Rules, Tools and Fools: Making Markets a Discrete Event

After his catastrophic loss, Jim had to face a painful irony. Just a few months after his November 1983 liquidation, the bean oil market turned sharply higher. Had he somehow held on until May 1984, his position would have been worth $3.2 million. However, Jim realized this wouldn't have changed the ultimate outcome - it would have only postponed and magnified his inevitable collapse. "If I had ridden through that valley of death and come out the other side with $3,200,000, somewhere along the line, in some other trade, I would have ended up losing $6,000,000 instead of $1,600,000," he reflects. This certainty came from understanding the psychological pattern he had fallen into. Through a lifetime of breaking rules yet succeeding, Jim had developed a dangerous belief in his own exceptionalism. "Once I realized I was breaking the rules but still succeeding, I thought rules were for everybody else, and that I could break them and still succeed," he explains. This mindset ensured that when a loss eventually came, he wouldn't accept it until it was catastrophic. Jim distilled his hard-won wisdom into a practical framework: Rules, Tools, and Fools. Rules are the hard-and-fast parameters that define when you will enter and exit the market. Tools are methods of analysis (fundamental, technical, or other) that have flexibility in how they're used. Fools have neither rules nor tools - they operate on emotion, impulse, and crowd psychology. The market doesn't care which category you fall into, but your account balance eventually will. The sequence of decision-making is crucial: first decide what type of participant you'll be (investor or speculator), select your markets, choose your method of analysis, develop rules, establish controls, and finally formulate a plan. Your analysis doesn't tell you what to do - it merely describes market conditions. Your rules implement the analysis by defining what constitutes an opportunity and how you'll respond to different scenarios. This approach isn't about predicting the future, but preparing for different possible futures. Jim emphasizes that focusing on "why" the market is moving is largely irrelevant. "When someone asks, 'Why is the market up?' does he really want to know why? No. If he is long he wants to hear the reason so he can reinforce his view that he is right... If he isn't long, he's probably short and wants to know why the market thinks the market is up, so that he can argue with it." He points out that profits don't depend on knowing why markets move: "The good news is, if you're long and the market is going up and you don't have a clue as to why, you get to keep all the money. Every cent." Perhaps most importantly, Jim learned that disciplined consistency, not measured inconsistency, is the key to market success. Unlike poker, where occasional bluffing is strategic, "bluffing" the market by breaking your rules will eventually lead to disaster. "If you try to bluff the market by staying in a losing trade and it comes back and turns into a profit, what have you learned? You have learned that doing the wrong thing pays off, which means you will try to bluff again." Breaking rules that occasionally succeed creates a random reward schedule - the strongest form of psychological reinforcement - ensuring you'll repeat the behavior until it eventually destroys you.

Summary

The fundamental truth revealed through Jim Paul's million-dollar loss is profoundly simple: Success can build upon repeated failures when those failures aren't taken personally, but failure will inevitably build upon repeated successes when those successes are taken personally. Stop personalizing both your wins and losses. When you internalize success as proof of your brilliance or special abilities, you set yourself up for catastrophic failure. Instead, judge yourself solely on whether you developed and followed a proper plan. Make your exit strategy the first part of any risk-taking endeavor - whether in markets, business ventures, or career decisions. The amount you're willing to lose must be determined before entering any position. And finally, remember this counterintuitive advice for when emotions inevitably creep in: Speculating is the only human endeavor where what feels good is the right thing to do. Stay with positions that make you feel good; exit positions that make you feel bad. The moment something doesn't feel right, stop doing it - your psychological warning system may be the last line of defense against catastrophic loss.

About Author

Loading...

Jim Paul

Read more