Where Good Ideas Come From

Where Good Ideas Come From Plot Summary

Introduction

Have you ever wondered why some places and periods in history seem to burst with creativity and innovation, while others remain stagnant? Think of Renaissance Florence, Silicon Valley in the 1970s, or the explosion of ideas that emerged from English coffeehouses in the 18th century. What connects these remarkable environments? In "Where Good Ideas Come From," Steven Johnson explores the surprising patterns that emerge when we look at innovation across different scales - from coral reefs to urban centers, from Darwin's insights to the development of the World Wide Web. Johnson reveals that good ideas rarely come from isolated eureka moments by lone geniuses. Instead, they emerge from environments that allow hunches to connect, that permit the adjacent possible to unfold, and that enable ideas to flow in liquid networks. This book identifies seven key patterns that recur throughout the history of innovation, showing us how certain spaces and conditions make breakthrough thinking more likely. By understanding these patterns, we can create more innovative environments in our organizations, communities, and personal lives - increasing our chances of stumbling upon the next great idea that might change the world.

Chapter 1: The Adjacent Possible: Innovation's Hidden Map

The adjacent possible represents the frontier of what can be created next from the materials and ideas currently available to us. It's like standing in a room with multiple doors, each leading to a new room you haven't visited yet. When you open one door and enter that room, new doors appear, leading to rooms that weren't accessible from your starting point. Innovation happens by exploring these new rooms, one door at a time. This concept explains why certain innovations occur when they do, not earlier or later. Consider modern computing: Charles Babbage designed the Analytical Engine in the 1830s, anticipating many features of modern computers, but it couldn't be built because the necessary components weren't available. The adjacent possible of the 1830s didn't include vacuum tubes or integrated circuits. Similarly, YouTube couldn't have succeeded in 1995 because internet bandwidth couldn't support video streaming and Flash hadn't been widely adopted. The adjacent possible also explains why multiple inventors often discover the same innovation simultaneously. When oxygen was discovered in the 1770s, three scientists identified it independently within a few years. The concept was "in the air" because previous discoveries had built the necessary foundation. These "multiples," as scholars call them, occur repeatedly throughout history because innovators are exploring the same frontier of possibility using the available building blocks of their time. In biology, the adjacent possible drives evolution. Life began with simple carbon-based molecules combining in early Earth's primordial soup. These molecules couldn't immediately form complex structures like DNA or cell membranes. Instead, simple combinations formed first, creating new building blocks that made more complex structures possible. Each innovation opened new doors in the adjacent possible. When fatty acids first formed spherical membranes, they created a division between inside and outside, allowing cells to develop. To enhance innovation in our own lives, we need to expand our access to the adjacent possible. This means exposing ourselves to diverse ideas, materials, and perspectives. The most innovative environments are those that allow for the free recombination of existing parts into new configurations. Like the engineers on Apollo 13 who had to build a carbon dioxide filter using only available items on the spacecraft, innovation often comes from inventively recombining what's already at hand.

Chapter 2: Liquid Networks: Social Environments for Good Ideas

Liquid networks represent the optimal environment for innovation – not too rigid like a solid, where elements are locked in place, but not too chaotic like a gas, where connections are too fleeting to be meaningful. In a liquid state, elements can interact randomly yet still maintain enough structure to preserve useful patterns. This metaphor helps explain why certain social and physical environments foster innovation better than others. The power of liquid networks is evident throughout history. When the first cities emerged in Mesopotamia, human innovation accelerated dramatically. Why? Because cities allow information to "spill over" between different minds. When thousands of people live in close proximity, ideas can more easily find their way into other brains and take root there. The growth of Renaissance cities like Florence and Venice created similar conditions, where ideas could flow between artists, scientists, and merchants, allowing innovations to spread rapidly. Modern research confirms this pattern. Kevin Dunbar, a McGill University psychologist, conducted a fascinating study where he set up cameras in molecular biology laboratories to observe how scientists actually make discoveries. Surprisingly, most breakthrough insights didn't occur when researchers were alone at their microscopes but during regular lab meetings where scientists discussed their work with colleagues. When experiments produced unexpected results, the group environment helped researchers reinterpret what might otherwise have been dismissed as errors. The physical architecture of innovation spaces matters tremendously. MIT's legendary Building 20, a "temporary" structure that lasted 55 years, became an extraordinary innovation hub precisely because its cheap, modifiable construction allowed occupants to reconfigure walls and ceilings as their projects evolved. It housed the beginnings of numerous breakthroughs, from linguistics to radar to early computing. Modern companies like Microsoft have tried to recreate this dynamic with flexible workspaces designed to encourage chance encounters and informal discussions. The most innovative networks maintain a balance between structure and freedom, connection and autonomy. They create what psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi calls "flow" – not just for individuals but for entire groups. A well-designed innovation space feels like a river, with ideas moving in a clear direction but with enough turbulence and eddies to create surprising combinations. Whether in cities, laboratories, or office spaces, liquid networks provide the ideal environment for ideas to connect, combine, and evolve.

Chapter 3: The Slow Hunch: Incubating Creative Insights Over Time

The eureka moment – that dramatic flash of insight where a fully-formed idea appears in a brilliant instant – is largely a myth. Most groundbreaking ideas don't arrive suddenly but develop gradually over time as "slow hunches" that need months or years to mature. These partial ideas linger in the back of our minds, gradually connecting with other concepts until they finally become complete. Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection exemplifies this pattern. Although Darwin himself later described his insight as a moment of clarity that came while reading Malthus, his notebooks tell a different story. The key elements of his theory appear throughout his journals years before his supposed epiphany, developing incrementally with each observation and experiment. When Darwin finally published "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, it represented the culmination of more than two decades of slow, methodical thought. Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, describes a similar process. His idea wasn't born in a single flash of inspiration but accumulated gradually over ten years. It began in the 1980s with a simple program he created called "Enquire" to help track connections between people and projects at CERN. This evolved into a more ambitious vision for connecting documents across computers, eventually becoming the Web. As Berners-Lee puts it: "Inventing the World Wide Web involved my growing realization that there was power in arranging ideas in an unconstrained, weblike way." Keeping slow hunches alive requires specific environments and practices. Darwin kept meticulous notebooks where he recorded observations, sketched diagrams, and explored contradictions. These notebooks weren't just passive records but active thinking tools where he could revisit and connect ideas over decades. This practice echoes the "commonplace books" kept by thinkers throughout history – personal notebooks where they collected quotes, observations, and thoughts that could later cross-pollinate into new insights. Modern organizations can nurture slow hunches through practices like Google's famous "20% time," which allows engineers to spend one day a week on projects of their own choosing. This policy has produced significant innovations like Gmail and AdSense because it gives promising ideas time to develop outside immediate commercial pressures. The key is creating spaces where partial ideas can survive long enough to find their missing pieces – whether in a personal notebook, an organizational culture, or digital tools that help us track and connect our thoughts over time.

Chapter 4: Serendipity: The Lucky Encounters That Drive Discovery

Serendipity – the happy accident of finding something valuable while looking for something else – plays a crucial role in innovation. But true serendipity isn't just blind luck; it's about recognizing the significance of unexpected connections. When Alexander Fleming noticed that mold had contaminated his bacterial cultures and was killing the bacteria, the contamination was accidental, but his ability to see this as a breakthrough rather than a ruined experiment turned it into penicillin. Our brains are designed to facilitate serendipitous connections. Research by neuroscientist Robert Thatcher revealed that the most creative minds alternate between two distinct states: "phase-lock," where neurons fire in synchrony, and a more chaotic mode where connections become more random. In studies of children's brains, those who spent slightly more time in the chaotic state scored higher on IQ tests. This suggests our brains need periods of deliberate disorder to make innovative connections. Dreams represent an extreme form of this neural chaos. German chemist August Kekulé famously discovered the ring structure of benzene after dreaming of a snake biting its own tail. This wasn't pure coincidence – Kekulé had been puzzling over the molecule's structure for years, and his dreaming brain made a connection his conscious mind had missed. Similarly, Otto Loewi discovered the chemical transmission of nerve impulses after a dream suggested a crucial experiment. The dream state allows our brains to try unlikely neural connections without the constraints of waking logic. We can cultivate serendipity in our environments too. Cities have always been serendipity engines because they bring diverse people and ideas into close proximity. The modern web similarly enables unexpected connections, despite critics who claim that personalization and filtering reduce chance discoveries. Tools like Twitter and social bookmarking create more opportunities for serendipitous encounters than the limited browsing of physical libraries or newspapers ever could. Organizations can foster serendipity by creating spaces where people from different departments or disciplines regularly interact. The legendary Bell Labs deliberately designed its facilities with long hallways connecting different departments, forcing researchers from various specialties to bump into each other. Companies like Pixar and Google have similarly designed their offices to maximize chance encounters. The key is building environments that enable what network theorists call "liquid networks" – spaces where ideas can flow freely between different minds and different contexts.

Chapter 5: Error: The Unexpected Paths to Breakthroughs

Mistakes and failures often pave the path to groundbreaking innovations. Consider the story of Lee de Forest, who invented the Audion vacuum tube – a device that made radio, television, and early computers possible. De Forest was completely wrong about how his invention worked; he thought gas inside the tube was detecting radio signals, when in fact his device worked better in a vacuum. As he later admitted, "I didn't know why it worked. It just did." His misunderstanding didn't prevent him from creating a world-changing technology. Error plays such a critical role in innovation because it forces us to question our assumptions and explore new directions. Thomas Kuhn, in his landmark work "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," showed that major scientific breakthroughs often begin when researchers encounter anomalies – experimental results that don't match their expectations. When Joseph Priestley placed a mint plant in an airless chamber, he expected it to die like animals did in the same environment. Instead, it thrived, leading him to discover photosynthesis and the plant's production of oxygen. Evolution itself depends on error. DNA replication occasionally produces mutations – mistakes in the genetic code. While most mutations are harmful or neutral, occasionally one proves beneficial in a changing environment. Human DNA has an error rate of roughly one in thirty million base pairs, resulting in about 150 mutations in each new child. This isn't a flaw in our biology; it's a feature. If our genetic code reproduced with perfect fidelity, evolution would grind to a halt. Without error, we wouldn't exist. Productive environments for innovation incorporate a certain tolerance for error. Psychologist Charlan Nemeth conducted fascinating experiments where she had groups evaluate colored slides, but secretly planted actors who deliberately misidentified the colors. Surprisingly, groups exposed to these "wrong" opinions generated more creative associations than groups receiving only accurate information. The erroneous inputs forced people to question their perceptions and consider alternative possibilities. Organizations that foster innovation build in space for productive error. Google famously encourages employees to "fail fast," recognizing that rapid experimentation with quick feedback cycles produces more breakthroughs than cautious perfectionism. The key distinction is between failures that provide new information and those that merely repeat known mistakes. As Benjamin Franklin observed, "Perhaps the history of the errors of mankind, all things considered, is more valuable and interesting than that of their discoveries."

Chapter 6: Exaptation: Repurposing Ideas for New Contexts

Exaptation occurs when an innovation developed for one purpose is repurposed for an entirely different function. The concept comes from evolutionary biology, where features evolved for one purpose later take on new roles. Bird feathers, for instance, originally evolved for temperature regulation but were later "exapted" for flight. This process accounts for many of nature's most remarkable innovations. The history of human innovation is similarly filled with exaptations. Johannes Gutenberg's printing press, one of history's most transformative inventions, repurposed the wine press. Gutenberg observed the screw-based presses used to extract juice from grapes in the Rhineland and realized this mechanism could apply uniform pressure to paper against inked type. He didn't invent an entirely new technology; he borrowed an existing one and applied it to a completely different domain. In modern times, Twitter exemplifies exaptation in action. Users, not the platform's creators, invented key features like hashtags (borrowed from IRC chat channels) and the @ symbol for replies. Even Twitter's search function was developed by a third party before being incorporated into the platform. The service was transformed by users finding unexpected applications for its basic components. Franco Moretti, a literary historian, has documented how genres in literature evolve through exaptation. The "stream of consciousness" technique first appeared in Edouard Dujardin's 1888 novel as brief introspective moments between plot points. Decades later, James Joyce exapted this technique in "Ulysses," transforming it into a powerful method for capturing the meandering thoughts of urban life. Dickens's Inspector Bucket character, intended to connect coincidental plot threads in "Bleak House," was later exapted into an entire detective fiction genre. Environments that encourage exaptation share certain characteristics. Cities excel at this because they nurture diverse subcultures that develop specialized knowledge, which can then spill over into unexpected applications. Sociologist Martin Ruef found that entrepreneurs with diverse, horizontal social networks spanning multiple fields were three times more innovative than those in uniform, vertical networks. When you bridge "structural holes" between different disciplines or communities, you gain access to ideas that can be repurposed in your own field. To foster exaptation in your own thinking, cultivate multiple hobbies and interests. Darwin studied coral reefs, bred pigeons, and researched earthworms alongside his evolutionary theories. Benjamin Franklin bounced between physics, politics, publishing, and invention. These diverse pursuits created mental networks where ideas from one domain could be exapted to solve problems in another. The most innovative minds are those that connect widely different fields, finding applications that specialists might miss.

Chapter 7: Platforms: Building Foundations for Further Innovation

Platforms are environments that enable innovations to stack upon one another, creating ever more complex and powerful systems. In nature, coral reefs exemplify this principle. These marine structures support an astonishing diversity of life – while occupying less than one-tenth of one percent of the ocean floor, they host nearly a quarter of all marine species. The coral polyps build calcium structures that become platforms for countless other organisms to inhabit, each adding new capabilities to the ecosystem. The most powerful technological innovations often function as platforms. The Internet itself is a platform that enabled Tim Berners-Lee to build the World Wide Web on top of it. The Web then became a platform for Google, Facebook, and countless other innovations. This stacking effect creates an exponential growth in possibilities – each new platform unlocks doors to many more innovations than would otherwise be possible. Government agencies can function as powerful innovation platforms as well. The Global Positioning System (GPS) began in the 1950s when scientists at Johns Hopkins University discovered they could track Sputnik's orbit by analyzing its radio signals. This insight was then "flipped" to use satellites of known position to determine locations on Earth. Initially developed for military applications, GPS was later opened to civilian use, enabling countless innovations from mobile mapping applications to location-based social networks that its creators never imagined. Platforms succeed by lowering barriers to innovation. They provide standard components that others can build upon without reinventing fundamental technologies. The modern Web exemplifies this approach through APIs (application programming interfaces) that allow developers to integrate services like mapping, payment processing, or social networking into new applications. When Twitter designed its platform, it made the unconventional choice to build the API first and the website second, enabling thousands of third-party developers to create applications the original team never envisioned. The platform approach can transform even traditional institutions. Vivek Kundra, while serving as Washington D.C.'s chief technology officer, launched "Apps for Democracy," inviting developers to build applications using government data. The contest generated 47 useful applications in just 30 days at a fraction of what traditional government procurement would have cost. This "government as platform" model represents a fundamental shift from governments trying to solve all problems internally to providing resources that enable citizens to create solutions. Successful platforms share key attributes: they're open enough for experimentation, they provide stable building blocks others can rely on, and they benefit from network effects where each new innovation makes the entire ecosystem more valuable. Whether in nature, technology, or institutions, platforms demonstrate that sometimes the most powerful innovation isn't a single breakthrough but a foundation that enables thousands of others.

Summary

The history of innovation reveals surprising patterns that recur across different domains and time periods. Good ideas rarely emerge from isolated flashes of genius or competitive markets alone. Instead, they flourish in environments that allow for connection, exploration, and recombination – what Johnson calls "the fourth quadrant" of non-market, decentralized innovation. From Darwin's coral reefs to the collaborative networks of the internet, the most innovative spaces share characteristics that we can deliberately cultivate. The key insight is that we can actively design environments to make breakthroughs more likely. By creating liquid networks where ideas can flow freely, giving slow hunches time to develop, embracing serendipity and even error, allowing concepts to be repurposed across domains, and building platforms that others can build upon – we dramatically increase our innovative potential. Whether in our personal lives, organizations, or communities, understanding these patterns gives us practical tools to nurture the next generation of world-changing ideas. As Johnson reminds us, chance favors the connected mind.

About Author

Loading...

Steven Johnson

Steven Johnson is the bestselling author of twelve books, including Enemy of All Mankind, Farsighted, Wonderland, How We Got to Now, Where Good Ideas Come From, The Invention of Air, The Ghost Map, and Everything Bad Is Good for You.He's the host of the podcast American Innovations, and the host and co-creator of the PBS and BBC series How We Got to Now. Johnson lives in Marin County, California, and Brooklyn, New York, with his wife and three sons.

Read more