Why I Am a Hindu

Why I Am a Hindu Plot Summary

Introduction

Hinduism represents one of the world's oldest and most complex religious traditions, yet its essence often remains misunderstood in contemporary discourse. At its philosophical core, Hinduism embraces a remarkable pluralism that acknowledges multiple valid paths to spiritual truth—a stark contrast to the monolithic political identity promoted by modern Hindutva movements. This fundamental tension between Hinduism as a diverse spiritual tradition and Hindutva as a political ideology forms the central investigation of this exploration, examining how ancient theological principles have been selectively appropriated and transformed for contemporary political purposes. The significance of this analysis extends far beyond academic interest, touching on fundamental questions about religious identity, cultural nationalism, and democratic pluralism in the modern world. By distinguishing between Hinduism's philosophical sophistication and its political instrumentalization, we gain insight into broader patterns of religious nationalism emerging globally. Through careful examination of classical Hindu texts, historical developments, social contradictions, and contemporary political movements, a nuanced understanding emerges that challenges simplistic narratives while illuminating the continued relevance of Hindu philosophical wisdom for addressing contemporary challenges.

Chapter 1: The Pluralistic Foundation of Hindu Philosophy

Hinduism stands as one of the world's oldest religious traditions, yet it defies conventional categorization as a single religion. Unlike Abrahamic faiths with their emphasis on doctrinal uniformity, Hinduism represents a complex tapestry of philosophical systems, spiritual practices, and cultural traditions that have evolved over millennia. At its core lies a profound theological inclusiveness—the recognition that truth can be approached through multiple paths. This spiritual fluidity is captured in the ancient Rig Vedic declaration "Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti" (Truth is one, the wise call it by many names). This foundational principle establishes Hinduism not as a dogmatic system but as a philosophical framework that accommodates diverse interpretations of divinity and spiritual experience. The tradition embraces seemingly contradictory concepts: polytheism coexists with monotheism, which in turn merges with monism and even atheistic philosophical schools. This theological inclusiveness is not a modern adaptation but is embedded in ancient texts like the Upanishads, which present the concept of Brahman—the ultimate reality that transcends personification yet manifests in countless forms. The concept of dharma—often inadequately translated as "religion"—actually encompasses a broader understanding of cosmic order, ethical duty, and righteous living. Unlike religions defined by specific creeds or prophetic revelations, Hinduism offers a framework for understanding one's place in the universe and the ethical imperatives that follow. This explains why Hinduism has historically absorbed rather than rejected new philosophical ideas and spiritual practices. Hindu philosophy's approach to divinity reflects this inclusive perspective. While popular Hinduism features a pantheon of gods and goddesses, sophisticated philosophical traditions like Advaita Vedanta understand these deities as manifestations of a single transcendent reality. This perspective allows practitioners to worship personal deities while simultaneously acknowledging the ultimate unity of all existence. The concept of ishta-devata—one's chosen deity—exemplifies this approach, permitting individual spiritual relationships without imposing uniformity. The Hindu tradition's emphasis on direct spiritual experience rather than doctrinal adherence has fostered remarkable diversity within its boundaries. Mystical traditions like yoga and meditation provide methodologies for personal spiritual exploration, while elaborate ritual traditions offer communal expressions of devotion. This experiential emphasis explains why Hinduism has historically been more concerned with orthopraxy (correct practice) than orthodoxy (correct belief).

Chapter 2: Hinduism's Historical Evolution: Adaptation Through Millennia

The historical development of Hinduism spans over four millennia, evolving from the ancient Vedic religion to the diverse traditions practiced today. The earliest phase, dating from approximately 1500 BCE, centered around elaborate fire sacrifices (yajnas) performed by specialized priests using hymns compiled in the Rig Veda. This early Vedic religion focused on propitiating natural forces personified as deities like Indra, Agni, and Varuna, with little emphasis on philosophical speculation or personal devotion. A profound transformation occurred around 800-600 BCE with the composition of the Upanishads, philosophical texts that shifted focus from external rituals to internal contemplation. The Upanishads introduced concepts that would become central to Hindu philosophy: Brahman (ultimate reality), Atman (the self), karma (action and its consequences), and moksha (liberation). This period also witnessed the emergence of heterodox traditions like Buddhism and Jainism, which challenged Vedic authority while sharing certain philosophical premises with emerging Hindu thought. The classical period (approximately 500 BCE to 500 CE) saw the systematization of Hindu philosophy into six orthodox schools (darshanas), each offering distinct approaches to understanding reality and achieving liberation. During this era, the great epics Mahabharata and Ramayana were compiled, embedding philosophical teachings within compelling narratives accessible to all social classes. The Bhagavad Gita, part of the Mahabharata, synthesized various philosophical approaches into a comprehensive spiritual system emphasizing devotion (bhakti), knowledge (jnana), and action (karma) as complementary paths. Medieval Hinduism (500-1500 CE) witnessed the flourishing of devotional movements that democratized spiritual practice beyond the Brahmin elite. Poet-saints like Mirabai, Tukaram, and the Alvars composed devotional hymns in regional languages, making spiritual teachings accessible to ordinary people. This period also saw the development of Tantra, which offered esoteric practices for spiritual transformation, and the refinement of philosophical systems by thinkers like Adi Shankara, who established Advaita Vedanta as a dominant intellectual tradition. Colonial encounters beginning in the 18th century prompted significant reformulations of Hindu thought. Faced with Christian missionary critiques and Western education, Hindu intellectuals like Ram Mohan Roy, Dayananda Saraswati, and Swami Vivekananda reinterpreted traditional teachings to address modern concerns. These reformers emphasized Hinduism's philosophical sophistication, ethical teachings, and compatibility with scientific thinking while critiquing practices like untouchability and gender discrimination that had developed over centuries. The modern period has witnessed both revitalization and politicization of Hindu traditions. While spiritual teachers like Ramana Maharshi and Sri Aurobindo developed contemplative approaches appealing to global audiences, political movements emerged that linked Hindu identity to national belonging. This tension between Hinduism as a universal philosophical tradition and as a marker of cultural-political identity continues to shape contemporary expressions of the tradition, revealing both the remarkable adaptability and the internal contradictions of this ancient yet ever-evolving religious complex.

Chapter 3: Social Contradictions: Caste, Gender, and Reform Movements

The Hindu tradition contains profound philosophical insights about human equality and spiritual potential, yet historical Hindu society developed rigid hierarchies that contradicted these inclusive ideals. The caste system, though not originally central to Vedic religion, gradually solidified into a complex social structure that assigned ritual status and occupational roles based on birth. By medieval times, the four-fold varna system (Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras) had expanded into thousands of endogamous jati groups, with those deemed "untouchable" facing severe discrimination despite performing essential social functions. This contradiction between spiritual universalism and social hierarchy created tensions within Hindu tradition itself. The Bhagavad Gita declares that the wise see the same divine essence in a Brahmin, a cow, an elephant, and even an outcaste, yet social practices often denied this fundamental equality. Reform movements repeatedly emerged to challenge these contradictions. Bhakti saints like Kabir, Ravidas, and Tukaram criticized caste discrimination, proclaiming that divine love transcended social boundaries. These poet-saints, many from lower castes themselves, created alternative spiritual communities where devotion rather than birth determined one's standing. Gender represents another domain where practice diverged from philosophical potential. Classical Hindu texts contain contradictory perspectives on women's spiritual and social status. The Upanishads include female sages like Gargi and Maitreyi, yet later dharmashastra texts often restricted women's religious and social roles. Tantric traditions recognized the divine feminine as the supreme power (Shakti), yet ordinary women faced numerous restrictions. This ambivalence allowed both patriarchal interpretations and feminist reclamations of Hindu traditions, with goddess worship providing symbolic resources for women's empowerment despite social limitations. The colonial period catalyzed systematic reform efforts addressing these contradictions. Raja Ram Mohan Roy founded the Brahmo Samaj in 1828, advocating monotheism, rational religion, and social reforms including opposition to sati (widow immolation) and support for women's education. Jyotirao Phule established the Satyashodhak Samaj to challenge Brahmin dominance and educate lower castes and women. Dayananda Saraswati's Arya Samaj promoted a return to Vedic authority while rejecting later accretions like untouchability and child marriage, arguing these practices contradicted authentic Hindu teachings. B.R. Ambedkar, himself born into an untouchable community, offered the most radical critique of caste hierarchy. After years attempting to reform Hinduism from within, Ambedkar ultimately concluded that untouchability was inseparable from the Hindu social system and led a mass conversion of his followers to Buddhism. His critique forced Hindu leaders to confront the contradiction between spiritual teachings and social practices, accelerating reform efforts while highlighting the depth of the problem. Contemporary Hindu communities continue grappling with these inherited contradictions. Progressive Hindu movements emphasize the tradition's philosophical universalism to challenge remaining discrimination, while conservative elements defend hierarchical practices as essential to Hindu identity. This ongoing tension reflects a fundamental question: whether Hinduism's essence lies in its philosophical insights about universal consciousness or in the social structures and practices that developed historically. The vitality of Hindu tradition may depend on its ability to align social realities with its highest philosophical ideals.

Chapter 4: Hindutva's Political Distortion of Hindu Theological Principles

Hindutva, or Hindu nationalism, represents a modern political ideology that claims to defend Hindu interests but fundamentally transforms Hindu theological principles in the process. Unlike traditional Hinduism's emphasis on spiritual pluralism, Hindutva reframes Hinduism primarily as a cultural and territorial identity. This ideological shift began with V.D. Savarkar's 1923 text "Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?" which defined Hindu identity not through religious belief but through three criteria: considering India as one's holy land (punyabhoomi), fatherland (pitribhoomi), and the cradle of one's religion. This definition deliberately excluded Muslims and Christians while including Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs as "Hindu" regardless of their theological distinctiveness. Savarkar, himself an atheist, was less concerned with spiritual matters than with creating a unified Hindu political identity to counter perceived threats from religious minorities. This marks a fundamental departure from traditional Hindu thought, which recognized diverse paths to truth rather than defining religious identity in opposition to an "other." M.S. Golwalkar, who led the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) from 1940 to 1973, further developed Hindutva ideology by explicitly modeling it after European ethnonationalism. In his writings, Golwalkar praised Nazi Germany's treatment of Jews as a model for handling minorities, suggesting that non-Hindus in India should either "adopt Hindu culture and language" or live "wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges." This exclusionary vision contradicts the inclusive ethos of classical Hindu thought, which historically accommodated diverse beliefs and practices. The theological distortion becomes evident in Hindutva's approach to sacred texts and traditions. While classical Hindu philosophy embraced interpretive diversity and acknowledged multiple valid paths, Hindutva selectively emphasizes elements that support nationalist narratives while downplaying universalist teachings. The Bhagavad Gita, traditionally interpreted as a text about spiritual duty and self-realization, is reframed primarily as a call to militant action in defense of dharma understood narrowly as Hindu cultural dominance. Hindutva's political expression manifests in campaigns that conflate religious symbolism with nationalist objectives. The movement to demolish the Babri Masjid and build a Ram temple in Ayodhya transformed Lord Rama from a divine exemplar of righteousness into a territorial marker of Hindu sovereignty. Similarly, cow protection movements elevate a traditional Hindu practice of non-violence toward cattle into a political weapon against religious minorities, particularly Muslims involved in the meat trade, despite historical evidence that beef consumption existed in ancient Hindu societies. Perhaps most significantly, Hindutva inverts Hinduism's traditional relationship to political power. Classical Hindu thought generally maintained a distinction between spiritual authority (brahma) and political power (kshatra), with the former ideally guiding the latter through ethical principles rather than direct rule. Hindutva, by contrast, seeks to capture state power directly to enforce a particular vision of Hindu identity, using religious symbolism to mobilize political support while implementing policies that often contradict Hindu ethical teachings about compassion and universal respect. This fusion of religious identity with political nationalism represents not a revival of traditional Hinduism but a modern ideological innovation that transforms the tradition it claims to defend.

Chapter 5: Reclaiming Authentic Hinduism from Political Appropriation

The contest over Hinduism's meaning in contemporary India represents more than an academic theological debate—it reflects a profound struggle over India's identity and future. Reclaiming authentic Hindu traditions from political appropriation requires distinguishing between Hinduism as a spiritual tradition and Hindutva as a political ideology. This distinction centers on contrasting approaches to pluralism, which traditional Hindu thought embraced as a philosophical principle rather than a reluctant compromise. Classical Hindu texts consistently affirm the validity of multiple spiritual paths. The Rig Veda's declaration that "truth is one, the wise call it by many names" establishes diversity as intrinsic to spiritual understanding rather than a problem to overcome. Similarly, the Bhagavad Gita states, "In whatever way people approach me, in that same way I receive them; all paths ultimately lead to me." This theological pluralism provided the foundation for Hinduism's historical capacity to incorporate diverse beliefs and practices without demanding uniformity. Swami Vivekananda articulated this pluralistic vision to global audiences at the 1893 World Parliament of Religions, declaring: "We believe not only in universal toleration, but we accept all religions as true." This statement reflects not modern secularism but traditional Hindu understanding that diverse religious expressions represent different human responses to the same transcendent reality. Vivekananda explicitly rejected the notion that Hinduism should seek to convert others, instead advocating mutual respect among traditions. This spiritual pluralism contrasts sharply with Hindutva's political appropriation of Hindu symbols and traditions. Where traditional Hinduism recognized the validity of multiple paths, Hindutva establishes a hierarchy with "Hindu" identity at the apex and religious minorities relegated to subordinate status. Where Hindu philosophy embraced interpretive diversity within its own tradition, Hindutva demands conformity to particular cultural and political expressions of Hindu identity. This transformation replaces Hinduism's philosophical sophistication with simplistic slogans and symbols deployed for political mobilization. Reclaiming authentic Hindu traditions requires recovering neglected intellectual and spiritual resources within the tradition itself. The sophisticated philosophical systems developed by thinkers like Adi Shankara, Ramanuja, and Abhinavagupta offer nuanced approaches to understanding reality that transcend contemporary political divisions. Similarly, bhakti traditions emphasizing direct devotional experience provide spiritual practices accessible to all regardless of social status or educational background, challenging hierarchies that Hindutva often reinforces. Contemporary Hindu spiritual leaders like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Jaggi Vasudev (Sadhguru) have attempted to reclaim Hindu spiritual practices while distancing them from exclusionary politics. By emphasizing meditation, yoga, and philosophical inquiry as universal human resources rather than markers of exclusive identity, these teachers continue the tradition of making Hindu spiritual practices accessible across cultural and religious boundaries. Their approach, while sometimes criticized for oversimplification, represents an alternative to political appropriation of Hindu traditions.

Chapter 6: Hindu Wisdom's Relevance for Contemporary Global Challenges

Hindu philosophical perspectives offer distinctive resources for addressing contemporary global challenges, particularly in an era characterized by environmental crisis, technological transformation, and cultural polarization. Unlike dualistic worldviews that separate humanity from nature, Hindu thought generally perceives the natural world as permeated with divine presence. The Upanishadic concept of Brahman as the underlying reality of all existence provides a philosophical foundation for ecological ethics that recognizes intrinsic value in all life forms, not merely instrumental value for human purposes. This perspective appears in traditional practices like sacred groves (preserved forest areas associated with local deities) and reverence for rivers like the Ganges and Yamuna. While these traditions sometimes conflict with modern development imperatives, they offer conceptual resources for sustainable relationships with natural systems. Contemporary environmental movements in India have drawn on these traditions to resist extractive development models, demonstrating how ancient religious perspectives can inform modern ecological consciousness. Hindu approaches to knowledge and consciousness also offer valuable perspectives in an age of artificial intelligence and virtual reality. The tradition's sophisticated analyses of consciousness as foundational rather than derivative challenge materialist assumptions underlying much technological development. Patanjali's Yoga Sutras and Advaita Vedanta philosophy explore states of consciousness beyond ordinary perception, suggesting that reality exceeds what technological systems can model or manipulate. These traditions do not reject technological advancement but situate it within broader questions about human purpose and consciousness. In the realm of identity politics and cultural conflict, Hindu philosophical traditions offer nuanced approaches to difference. The concept of dharma as contextual ethical duty recognizes that appropriate action depends on specific circumstances rather than universal rules. This contextual ethics potentially transcends both rigid traditionalism and abstract universalism, acknowledging cultural particularity while seeking underlying ethical principles. Similarly, the tradition's recognition that ultimate reality transcends conceptual categories suggests possibilities for dialogue across seemingly incommensurable worldviews. Diaspora Hindu communities demonstrate both the challenges and opportunities of Hindu identity in global contexts. Approximately 15 million Hindus live outside India, with significant populations in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and throughout the Caribbean and Southeast Asia. These communities have developed distinctive adaptations of Hindu traditions, sometimes emphasizing philosophical universalism to engage with pluralistic societies, sometimes reinforcing cultural particularity to maintain identity across generations. Their experiences reveal Hinduism's capacity for cultural adaptation while maintaining continuity with traditional sources. The global spread of practices like yoga and meditation, now largely detached from their Hindu philosophical contexts, presents both opportunities and challenges. While these practices introduce millions to elements of Hindu tradition, their commercialization and decontextualization risk reducing rich philosophical traditions to wellness techniques. Some Hindu organizations have responded by reasserting the traditions' religious dimensions, while others embrace the opportunity for Hindu-derived practices to influence global culture beyond religious boundaries.

Summary

Hindu dharma represents one of humanity's most sophisticated approaches to perennial philosophical questions, offering a framework that accommodates diverse spiritual paths while maintaining coherent ethical principles. Its distinctive contribution lies not in dogmatic certainty but in embracing complexity—recognizing that ultimate reality transcends conceptual categories while still providing practical guidance for living. This philosophical sophistication explains why figures from Schopenhauer to Oppenheimer found inspiration in Hindu texts, discovering perspectives that Western philosophical traditions often overlooked. The tension between Hindu philosophy's universalist potential and its historical embodiment in particular social structures remains unresolved. This creative tension has generated both remarkable spiritual insights and problematic social hierarchies, both inclusive theological visions and exclusionary political movements. Rather than seeing this tension as a contradiction to resolve, we might understand it as reflecting the tradition's fundamental insight that truth manifests through multiple, sometimes conflicting expressions. Hindu dharma thus offers not a single answer to contemporary challenges but a methodology for engaging complexity with both intellectual rigor and spiritual depth—a capacity increasingly valuable in our fractured global discourse.

About Author

Loading...

Shashi Tharoor

Shashi Tharoor is a member of the Indian Parliament from the Thiruvananthapuram constituency in Kerala. He previously served as the United Nations Under-Secretary General for Communications and Public Information and as the Indian Minister of State for External Affairs.He is also a prolific author, columnist, journalist and a human rights advocate.He has served on the Board of Overseers of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He is also an adviser to the International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva and a Fellow of the New York Institute of the Humanities at New York University. He has also served as a trustee of the Aspen Institute, and the Advisory of the Indo-American Arts Council, the American India Foundation, the World Policy Journal, the Virtue Foundation and the human rights organization Breakthrough He is also a Patron of the Dubai Modern High School and the managing trustee of the Chandran Tharoor Foundation which he founded with his family and friends in the name of his late father, Chandran Tharoor.Tharoor has written numerous books in English. Most of his literary creations are centred on Indian themes and they are markedly “Indo-nostalgic.” Perhaps his most famous work is The Great Indian Novel, published in 1989, in which he uses the narrative and theme of the famous Indian epic Mahabharata to weave a satirical story of Indian life in a non-linear mode with the characters drawn from the Indian Independence Movement. His novel Show Business (1992) was made into the film 'Bollywood'(1994). The late Ismail Merchant had announced his wish to make a film of Tharoor’s novel Riot shortly before Merchant’s death in 2005.Tharoor has been a highly-regarded columnist in each of India's three best-known English-language newspapers, most recently for The Hindu newspaper (2001–2008) and in a weekly column, “Shashi on Sunday,” in the Times of India (January 2007 – December 2008). Following his resignation as Minister of State for External Affairs, he began a fortnightly column on foreign policy issues in the "Deccan Chronicle". Previously he was a columnist for the Gentleman magazine and the Indian Express newspaper, as well as a frequent contributor to Newsweek International and the International Herald Tribune. His Op-Eds and book reviews have appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, amongst other papers.Tharoor began writing at the age of 6 and his first published story appeared in the “Bharat Jyoti”, the Sunday edition of the "Free press Journal", in Mumbai at age 10. His World War II adventure novel Operation Bellows, inspired by the Biggles books, was serialized in the Junior Statesman starting a week before his 11th birthday. Each of his books has been a best-seller in India. The Great Indian Novel is currently in its 28th edition in India and his newest volume. The Elephant, the Tiger and the Cellphone has undergone seven hardback re-printings there.Tharoor has lectured widely on India, and is often quoted for his observations, including, "India is not, as people keep calling it, an underdeveloped country, but rather, in the context of its history and cultural heritage, a highly developed one in an advanced state of decay.". He has also coined a memorable comparison of India's "thali" to the American "melting pot": "If America is a melting pot, then to me India is a thali--a selection of sumptuous dishes in different bowls. Each tastes different, and does not necessarily mix with the next, but they belong together on the same plate, and they complement each other in making the meal a satisfying repast."

Read more