You May Also Like

You May Also Like Plot Summary

Introduction

When you bite into your favorite food, listen to a song that moves you to tears, or find yourself drawn to a particular painting, have you ever wondered what's really happening in your brain? The experience of liking something feels deeply personal and intuitive, yet science reveals that our preferences are shaped by forces we rarely notice. From the foods we crave to the music we stream, our tastes are influenced by a complex interplay of biology, psychology, and social factors that operate largely beneath our conscious awareness. Our preferences aren't simply hardwired or random—they follow fascinating patterns that scientists have begun to decode. Research shows that our tastes are remarkably malleable, shaped by repeated exposure, social influence, and even our expectations. What we think of as our unique personal style is actually the product of countless invisible influences, from early childhood experiences to cultural trends. Understanding the science of taste not only helps explain why we like what we like, but also reveals how our preferences connect us to others, express our identities, and even predict our behaviors in surprising ways.

Chapter 1: The Psychology Behind Our Preferences

The human mind processes preferences through a fascinating blend of conscious reasoning and unconscious influences. While we often believe we know exactly why we like certain things, research consistently shows that our stated reasons rarely capture the full picture. Our brains make rapid, automatic judgments about what we like before conscious thought even begins. These snap decisions are influenced by evolutionary programming that originally helped our ancestors survive—we're naturally drawn to sweet tastes that signal caloric energy and instinctively repelled by bitter flavors that might indicate toxins. What's particularly intriguing is how our preferences are shaped by exposure and familiarity. Psychologist Robert Zajonc's groundbreaking research on the "mere exposure effect" demonstrated that simply encountering something repeatedly increases our liking for it, even without conscious awareness. This explains why initially challenging experiences—whether the bitter taste of coffee, the complex harmonies of jazz, or the unusual aesthetics of modern art—often become favorites with repeated exposure. Our brains find processing familiar stimuli more fluent and rewarding, creating a positive feedback loop where recognition itself generates pleasure. Context dramatically influences our preferences in ways we rarely notice. The same wine tastes better when poured from an expensive bottle, music sounds more appealing when we believe it's performed by renowned musicians, and food appears more delicious when artfully plated. These effects aren't merely suggestibility—brain imaging studies show that our expectations actually change neural responses to sensory experiences. When we believe we're consuming something high-quality, our brains literally process the experience differently, enhancing pleasure centers and diminishing critical evaluation. Memory plays surprising tricks on our preferences as well. Research shows that our remembered pleasure from experiences has little to do with their duration or average enjoyment. Instead, we primarily recall peak moments (the most intense parts) and endings (how things concluded). This "peak-end rule" explains why a brief, intensely pleasurable experience often creates stronger preference memories than longer, moderately enjoyable ones. Our preferences are shaped not by experiences themselves but by how we remember them—a distinction that marketers and experience designers increasingly understand and leverage. Our personal histories create unique preference landscapes through a process psychologists call "evaluative conditioning." When stimuli are repeatedly paired with positive or negative experiences, we develop automatic preferences or aversions. This explains why the smell of certain foods might trigger powerful nostalgia if associated with happy childhood memories, or why particular songs become lifelong favorites when connected to significant emotional events. These conditioned preferences operate largely outside conscious awareness but profoundly shape what we're drawn to throughout life.

Chapter 2: How Social Influence Shapes Our Tastes

Our preferences are far more social than we typically acknowledge. Humans are fundamentally social creatures, and our tastes function as powerful signals that help us connect with certain groups while distinguishing ourselves from others. The music we enjoy, the clothes we wear, and even the foods we eat serve as markers of our social identity. This explains why teenagers often adopt musical tastes that horrify their parents—it's less about sonic qualities and more about establishing independence and connection with peers. The power of social influence on our preferences is remarkably strong. Studies consistently show that when we see others enjoying something—whether it's a new food, music genre, or fashion style—we become more likely to enjoy it ourselves. This conformity isn't merely conscious imitation; our brains actually find experiences more rewarding when we know others approve of them. Brain imaging research reveals that when we consume something popular, reward centers activate more strongly than when we consume identical items believed to be unpopular. This neural response helps explain why social proof is such a powerful force in shaping preferences. Our desire to signal social status through taste creates fascinating dynamics. Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu famously argued that taste functions as a form of "cultural capital"—the aesthetic choices we make help establish and maintain social hierarchies. This explains why certain preferences are considered "highbrow" while others are deemed "lowbrow." Yet there's a constant tension between conformity and distinction in how we develop tastes. We simultaneously want to fit in with our chosen social groups while also expressing individuality, leading to what researchers call "optimal distinctiveness"—preferences that signal group membership while maintaining personal uniqueness. In our digital age, social influence on taste has accelerated dramatically. Online review platforms, recommendation algorithms, and social media have transformed how we discover and form preferences. When Netflix analyzed viewer behavior, they discovered something revealing: what people claim to enjoy often differs significantly from what they actually watch. Many users professed to love foreign films and documentaries but primarily watched mainstream comedies and dramas. This gap between stated and actual preferences highlights how we often present idealized versions of our tastes to appear more sophisticated or cultured. The internet has created new forms of taste communities that transcend geographic boundaries. From online forums dedicated to obscure music genres to social media groups focused on niche hobbies, people with unusual preferences can now find others who share their tastes. These digital taste communities provide not just information exchange but also validation and identity reinforcement. Finding others who appreciate what we like confirms that our preferences are legitimate and meaningful, even when they diverge from mainstream tastes.

Chapter 3: The Sensory Science of Flavor Perception

What we commonly call "taste" is actually a complex multisensory experience involving far more than just our taste buds. While the human tongue can detect five basic tastes—sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami (savory)—the rich complexity of flavor comes primarily from our sense of smell. When we eat, volatile compounds travel up the back of our throats to olfactory receptors, creating what scientists call "retronasal olfaction." This explains why food tastes bland when we have a cold and our nasal passages are blocked—we're experiencing taste without smell, which is like watching a movie without the soundtrack. Our perception of flavor is dramatically influenced by input from our other senses. Visual cues significantly impact taste expectations and experiences—red-colored beverages taste sweeter than clear ones with identical sugar content, and food appears more appetizing when artfully plated. Sound also plays a surprising role in flavor perception. The crunch of potato chips, the fizz of carbonation, or the sizzle of a hot dish all contribute to our enjoyment. Even background noise affects taste sensitivity—research shows that loud environments like airplane cabins diminish our ability to detect sweetness and saltiness, which explains why airline food often tastes bland despite chefs' best efforts. The tactile qualities of food—what food scientists call "mouthfeel"—form another crucial dimension of flavor perception. The creamy texture of ice cream, the crisp bite of an apple, or the tender pull of slow-cooked meat all contribute significantly to our enjoyment. These textural elements are processed by the trigeminal nerve, which detects physical sensations in the mouth. Texture preferences show interesting cultural variations—Japanese cuisine often celebrates slippery textures that Western diners might find challenging, while Americans typically prefer crunchier foods than those from many other cultures. Our flavor perceptions are remarkably individualized due to genetic differences. About 25% of people are "supertasters" who have more fungiform papillae (structures containing taste buds) and experience flavors with greater intensity. This explains why some people find vegetables unbearably bitter while others enjoy them—supertasters experience compounds like PROP (found in many vegetables) much more intensely. Other genetic variations affect specific taste receptors, like those for sweetness or umami, creating different baseline sensitivities across populations. These biological differences, combined with our unique histories of flavor exposure, help explain why taste preferences can vary so dramatically between individuals. The brain integrates all this sensory information through a process called "flavor binding," creating unified perceptions from disparate sensory inputs. This integration happens primarily in the orbitofrontal cortex, which receives signals from taste, smell, touch, vision, and even hearing pathways. What makes this process fascinating is how malleable it is—our expectations can literally change how our brains process flavor. When we believe we're drinking expensive wine, brain regions associated with pleasure show enhanced activity compared to when we drink the identical wine labeled as cheap. This demonstrates that flavor isn't simply what happens on our tongues but is actively constructed by our brains.

Chapter 4: Why Our Tastes Change Over Time

Our preferences are not static—they evolve throughout our lives in fascinating and sometimes unpredictable ways. This evolution happens both at the individual level, as we age and gain new experiences, and at the societal level, as cultural trends rise and fall. Understanding these patterns helps explain why the music we loved as teenagers often holds special emotional power, or why fashion styles cycle through periods of popularity and obscurity. One of the most powerful mechanisms driving taste change is repeated exposure. Contrary to the idea that familiarity breeds contempt, research consistently shows that repeated exposure to stimuli—whether foods, music, or visual art—generally increases our liking for them. This "mere exposure effect" explains why initially challenging flavors like coffee, beer, or spicy foods can become beloved favorites with time. Our brains process familiar stimuli more fluently, creating a positive feedback loop where recognition itself generates pleasure. However, this effect interacts with complexity in interesting ways—simple stimuli can quickly become boring with repeated exposure, while complex stimuli may continue to reveal new dimensions that sustain interest. Our preferences are shaped by what psychologists call "hedonic adaptation"—our tendency to quickly adjust to new pleasures until they become ordinary. This explains why the excitement of a new purchase or experience often fades quickly. Interestingly, adaptation happens faster for material goods than for experiences, which is why experiential purchases (concerts, travel) typically provide more lasting satisfaction than material ones (clothing, electronics). Variety and surprise help counteract adaptation, which explains why restaurants constantly update menus and fashion continuously cycles through new styles. Life stages dramatically influence our taste evolution. Research shows that our musical preferences often crystallize during late adolescence and early adulthood—around age 23.5 for most people. This isn't merely nostalgia; these formative years represent a time when we have both the freedom to explore music extensively and the need to forge identity through cultural choices. The preferences established during this period often remain emotionally significant throughout life, even as we develop new tastes. Similar patterns appear in other domains, with preferences formed during emotionally significant periods showing remarkable persistence. Social and cultural factors create broader patterns of taste evolution. When high-status individuals or groups adopt certain preferences, others often follow, creating cascading effects through society. This explains why fashion trends typically start with cultural elites before spreading to the mainstream. In our digital age, these taste shifts can happen with unprecedented speed, as social media allows new preferences to spread globally in days rather than years. Yet despite this acceleration, many preference patterns follow predictable cycles—what sociologists call "taste cycles"—where styles move from novel to mainstream to outdated before eventually becoming retro and desirable again. Perhaps most fascinating is how we typically underestimate how much our preferences will change in the future—a phenomenon psychologists call the "end of history illusion." When researchers ask people to reflect on how much their tastes have changed over the past decade and then predict how much they'll change in the coming decade, most acknowledge significant past changes but expect minimal future evolution. This cognitive bias leads us to believe our current preferences are somehow more authentic or permanent than previous ones, when in reality, our tastes will likely continue evolving throughout our lives.

Chapter 5: Expert Judgment vs. Popular Opinion

Professional critics and experts evaluate quality differently than everyday consumers. While ordinary people typically focus on whether they personally enjoyed an experience ("I liked this movie"), experts place experiences within broader contexts of history, technique, and innovation ("This film advances cinematic language through its innovative narrative structure"). This contextual evaluation explains why critics sometimes champion works that audiences initially reject—they're often evaluating different qualities than immediate pleasure or entertainment value. Expert judgment relies heavily on comparative assessment. Wine critics don't simply decide whether they enjoy a particular Cabernet; they evaluate it against other Cabernets from the same region, vintage, and price point. This comparative framework allows experts to detect subtle quality differences that might escape casual consumers. Studies show that even when blindfolded, professional musicians can identify higher-quality instruments through touch and sound alone, suggesting expertise creates genuine perceptual advantages through training and experience. The development of expertise follows predictable patterns. Psychologist K. Anders Ericsson's research on "deliberate practice" shows that developing true expertise typically requires around 10,000 hours of focused, feedback-rich practice. During this development, experts acquire specialized perceptual skills—sommeliers learn to detect subtle flavor notes, art appraisers recognize brushstroke patterns characteristic of specific artists. These specialized perceptual abilities explain why experts often notice qualities invisible to novices. However, expertise isn't simply about enhanced perception—it also involves developing rich mental frameworks that organize knowledge and guide attention to relevant features. Expert judgment isn't immune to biases and contextual influences. The famous "Judgment of Paris" in 1976, where California wines defeated French wines in a blind tasting by French judges, demonstrated how strongly expectations shape even expert evaluations. Similarly, when professional violinists were asked to play both modern violins and priceless Stradivarius instruments without knowing which was which, they consistently preferred the modern instruments—contradicting the conventional wisdom that Stradivari created objectively superior instruments. These findings suggest that even expert judgment contains elements of socially constructed value. The relationship between expert and popular opinion is complex and domain-specific. In some areas, like restaurants, expert ratings (Michelin stars) correlate reasonably well with consumer ratings (Yelp reviews). In others, like literature or film, the correlation is much weaker. When books win prestigious awards like the Pulitzer Prize, their ratings on sites like Goodreads actually tend to drop—a phenomenon researchers call "the paradox of publicity." The award attracts readers whose tastes don't align with the book's style, leading to more polarized reactions. This divergence raises fascinating questions about the nature of quality—is it objective and discoverable by trained experts, or fundamentally subjective and personal? The democratization of criticism through online platforms has created new tensions between traditional expert authority and crowd-sourced evaluation. Sites like Rotten Tomatoes now present both critic and audience scores side by side, acknowledging these perspectives often diverge. Rather than rendering expert judgment obsolete, this democratization has clarified its distinct value. Expert critics provide historical context, technical analysis, and comparative frameworks that complement but don't replace the immediate hedonic responses of everyday consumers. Both perspectives offer valuable but different information about quality.

Chapter 6: Taste as Personal Identity

Our tastes do more than reflect our preferences—they help constitute our sense of self. The music we love, the foods we enjoy, the aesthetic styles we appreciate all become woven into our identity narratives. We don't just like certain things; we become "the kind of person" who likes those things. This explains why people often react defensively when their tastes are criticized—such criticism feels like an attack on their identity rather than simply a disagreement about preferences. This connection between taste and identity begins forming in childhood but intensifies during adolescence, when young people actively use cultural preferences to establish independence from parents and connection with peers. The music, fashion, and slang that define teenage years often remain emotionally significant throughout life, serving as touchstones of identity even as actual preferences evolve. Research shows that the music we listen to between ages 15-25 tends to remain especially meaningful, likely because it's associated with formative life experiences and the development of adult identity. Our preferences serve as powerful social signals that help us connect with certain groups while distinguishing ourselves from others. When someone proudly displays their vinyl record collection, wears band merchandise, or posts about their favorite restaurants on social media, they're not just sharing information—they're signaling their membership in particular taste communities. These signals help us identify potential friends and partners with compatible values and interests. Studies show that people with similar taste profiles tend to form stronger social bonds and experience greater relationship satisfaction, suggesting our preferences help us find our "tribe." In our digital age, taste has become increasingly visible and performative. Social media platforms encourage us to curate and display our preferences, turning taste into a form of personal branding. The restaurants we visit, concerts we attend, and products we purchase are now routinely shared online, allowing others to witness and validate our taste choices. This visibility has intensified the identity aspects of taste, as our preferences become part of our public persona. Recommendation algorithms further reinforce this connection by suggesting content based on our past choices, creating digital environments that reflect and reinforce our taste identities. The relationship between taste and identity also explains why we often form communities around shared preferences. From book clubs to fan conventions to online forums dedicated to niche interests, humans naturally gather around common tastes. These "taste communities" provide not just social connection but also a sense of belonging and validation. When we find others who share our seemingly idiosyncratic preferences, we feel understood in a profound way. This connection between taste, identity, and community helps explain why our preferences matter so deeply to us—they're not just about what we like, but who we are and where we belong.

Summary

The science of taste reveals that our preferences are far more complex than simple likes and dislikes—they emerge from a fascinating interplay of biology, psychology, and social forces. Our tastes are simultaneously deeply personal and profoundly social, shaped by everything from our genetic makeup to our cultural environment. What feels like an intuitive, individual choice is actually influenced by exposure effects, social signaling, sensory integration, and identity formation. This understanding transforms how we view our own preferences, revealing them as dynamic, evolving aspects of ourselves rather than fixed traits. This exploration of taste science raises intriguing questions about authenticity and choice. If our preferences are shaped by so many invisible influences, how much agency do we really have in developing our tastes? Can we deliberately cultivate new preferences, and if so, which ones might enrich our lives? Perhaps the most valuable insight is recognizing that our tastes are not merely passive reactions but active expressions of who we are and who we aspire to become. By understanding the science behind our preferences, we gain not just fascinating insights into human psychology but also a deeper appreciation for the complex ways we connect with the world and each other through what we choose to like.

About Author

Loading...

Tom Vanderbilt

Tom Vanderbilt writes on design, technology, science, and culture, among other subjects, for many publications, including Wired, Outside, The London Review of Books, The Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Wilson Quarterly, Artforum, The Wilson Quarterly, Travel and Leisure, Rolling Stone, The New York Times Magazine, Cabinet, Metropolis, and Popular Science. He is contributing editor to Artforum and the design magazine Print and I.D., contributing writer of the popular blog Design Observer, and columnist for Slate magazine.His most recent book is the New York Times bestseller Traffic:Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K. and territories, and by publishers in 18 other countries. He is also the author of two previous books: Survival City: Adventures Among the Ruins of Atomic America (Princeton Architectural Press, 2002; published in PB by the University of Chicago Press in 2010), an offbeat architectural travelogue of the nation’s secret Cold War past; and The Sneaker Book (The New Press, 1998), a cultural history of the athletic shoe (published in Italian and Swedish editions). His early writings for The Baffler have been collected in two anthologies, Commodify Your Dissent and Boob Jubilee (W.W. Norton, eds. Thomas Frank and Matthew Weiland), and he has also contributed essays to a number of books, including New York Stories: The Best of the City Section of the New York Times (New York University Press); Supercade: The Visual History of the Video Game Age (The MIT Press), Else/Where: Mapping (The University of Minnesota Press, 2006),Quonset Hut: Metal Living for a Modern Age (Princeton Architectural Press, 2005), The World and the Wild (The University of Arizona Press), and The Thinking Fan’s Guide to the World Cup (Harper Perennial, 2006).He has consulted for a variety of companies, from ad agencies to Fortune 500 corporations, and has given lectures at a variety of institutions around the world, from the Eero Saarinen Lecture at Yale University’s School of Architecture to the Australasian Road Safety Conference in Canberra. He has appeared on a wide variety of radio and television programs around the world, including NBC’s Today Show, ABC News’ Nightline, NPR’s Morning Edition, Fresh Air with Teri Gross, the BBC’s World Service and The One Show, MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Fox Business, and CNN’s Business Today, among many others. He is a Visiting Scholar at New York University’s Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management, and has received fellowships from the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visiting Arts, the Design Trust for Public Space, and the Canadian Centre for Architecture. He is also a member of the U.S. Department of Interior’s Cold War Advisory Committee, a group studying the identification of sites and resources significant to the Cold War. Courtsey : http://www.tomvanderbilt.com/bio/

Read more

Related Books by Tom Vanderbilt

Loading...

Beginners

Tom Vanderbilt

The Joy and Transformative Power of Lifelong Learning

★★★½☆3.7

Loading...

Traffic

Tom Vanderbilt

Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us)

★★★½☆3.7