Ego is the Enemy

Ego is the Enemy Plot Summary

Introduction

Have you ever noticed how some highly talented people seem to self-destruct at the peak of their careers? Or how certain promising startups implode just as they're gaining traction? There's a silent saboteur at work in these situations – one that operates from within. It's not lack of skill or bad market conditions that derail many of us on our path to achievement. It's our own ego. When we achieve early success, ego whispers that we're special, different, and deserving of more. When we face setbacks, ego convinces us it's someone else's fault. And when we're climbing toward our goals, ego tempts us to talk instead of work, to seek validation instead of improvement. This destructive force operates at every stage of our journey. But there is another way. Through the stories of remarkable individuals who mastered their egos rather than being mastered by them, we discover how humility, reality-based confidence, and a focus on work rather than recognition can lead to lasting achievement. By learning to recognize and manage our ego, we can navigate the treacherous terrain of ambition, success, and failure with grace and effectiveness.

Chapter 1: The Silent Power of Humility: Lessons from Sherman's Ascent

In the midst of the American Civil War, one general stood apart from his peers in a remarkable way. William Tecumseh Sherman, unlike many ambitious military leaders of his time, repeatedly demonstrated an unusual quality: genuine humility paired with extraordinary competence. Early in his career, when offered a promotion that would have given him superior command, Sherman did something almost unthinkable. He approached President Lincoln and requested assurance that he would not have to accept the higher position. While every other general was clamoring for more rank and power, Sherman asked for less, believing he wasn't yet ready for such responsibility. "Would Lincoln give him his word on that?" Sherman asked. The president, surprised but impressed, happily agreed. This wasn't the only instance of Sherman's remarkable self-awareness. During the siege at Fort Donelson, though he technically outranked General Ulysses S. Grant, Sherman chose to waive his rank and support Grant instead of issuing orders. "This is your show," Sherman told him in a note accompanying supplies, "call upon me for any assistance I can provide." Together, they secured one of the Union's first victories in the war. As Sherman carved his path through the South in his famous march to the sea, he avoided traditional battles whenever possible. His entire theory of warfare rested on deliberately avoiding frontal assaults or shows of strength through pitched battles. He ignored criticism designed to bait a reaction and stuck to his plan. His realism allowed him to see a path that others thought impossible. One of Sherman's biographers captured the essence of what made him different: "Among men who rise to fame and leadership two types are recognizable—those who are born with a belief in themselves and those in whom it is a slow growth dependent on actual achievement." Sherman belonged to the latter category. His confidence was built on real accomplishments, not self-delusion or entitlement. He understood that if your belief in yourself isn't dependent on actual achievement, then it's dependent on nothing but ego. This is the paradox that defines truly effective people: they are confident but not egotistical, ambitious but patient, driven but grounded in reality. Like Sherman, they understand that restraint, self-awareness, and humility aren't weaknesses but strengths that enable lasting success. The question for all of us becomes: which type of person will you be?

Chapter 2: Action Over Words: Why Talking Undermines Achievement

In 1934, author and activist Upton Sinclair made an unusual move during his campaign for governor of California. Before the election, he published a short book titled "I, Governor of California and How I Ended Poverty," written in the past tense, describing the brilliant policies he had enacted as governor—an office he had not yet won. The book was a bestseller. The campaign, however, was a devastating failure, with Sinclair losing by more than a quarter million votes. What happened? As his friend Carey McWilliams later observed, "Upton not only realized that he would be defeated but seemed somehow to have lost interest in the campaign. In that vivid imagination of his, he had already acted out the part of 'I, Governor of California,'... so why bother to enact it in real life?" Sinclair's talk had gotten ahead of his campaign, and his will to bridge the gap collapsed. This pattern repeats itself in countless modern scenarios. Consider writer Emily Gould, who received a six-figure book deal but found herself stuck for over a year. Why? As she later admitted, "I can't really remember anything else I did in 2010. I tumbld, I tweeted, and I scrolled. This didn't earn me any money but it felt like work." She justified her online activities as "building her brand" and "creative acts," but they were actually substitutes for the real work of writing her novel. The technology platforms we use daily exacerbate this tendency. Facebook asks, "What's on your mind?" Twitter prompts us to "Compose a new tweet." These empty spaces beg to be filled with our thoughts, plans, and aspirations. Almost universally, what we share on social media is positive and forward-looking. It's rarely the truth: "I'm scared. I'm struggling. I don't know." Research shows that talking about our plans triggers the same satisfaction centers in our brain as actually accomplishing them. After spending time thinking, explaining, and talking about a task, we start to feel that we've gotten closer to achieving it. The more difficult the task and the more uncertain the outcome, the more we're tempted to talk rather than act. The baseball and football great Bo Jackson demonstrated the opposite approach. When he set two ambitious goals at Auburn—winning the Heisman Trophy and being taken first in the NFL draft—do you know who he told? Nobody but his girlfriend. Strategic flexibility isn't the only benefit of silence. It's also psychological. As the poet Hesiod noted, "A man's best treasure is a thrifty tongue." Talk depletes the very energy we need for action. Instead of announcing your intentions, protect them from the dissipating effects of premature talk. The greatest work and art comes from wrestling with the void, facing it instead of scrambling to make it go away with words. When faced with your particular challenge—whether researching in a new field, starting a business, producing a film, or advancing an important cause—will you seek the respite of talk or face the struggle head-on?

Chapter 3: Purpose Beyond Self: Choosing the Path of Meaningful Work

One of the most influential military strategists in modern warfare is someone most people have never heard of: John Boyd. Though he never published any books and wrote only one academic paper, Boyd transformed maneuver warfare across multiple branches of the armed forces. The F-15 and F-16 fighter jets were his pet projects. His primary influence came through legendary briefings where he taught nearly every major military thinker of a generation. Despite his profound impact, Boyd retired without much more than a small apartment and a pension to his name. He had more enemies than friends. No military bases or battleships bear his name. This unusual path—was it deliberate? Could it have made him more influential? The answer lies in a speech Boyd gave to promising young officers who came under his wing. Sensing a critical inflection point in one protégé's life, Boyd called him in for a meeting. "Tiger, one day you will come to a fork in the road," Boyd said, "And you're going to have to make a decision about which direction you want to go." Using his hands to illustrate, Boyd marked off two paths. "If you go that way you can be somebody. You will have to make compromises and you will have to turn your back on your friends. But you will be a member of the club and you will get promoted and you will get good assignments." Then Boyd paused to make the alternative clear: "Or you can go that way and you can do something—something for your country and for your Air Force and for yourself. If you decide you want to do something, you may not get promoted and you may not get the good assignments and you certainly will not be a favorite of your superiors. But you won't have to compromise yourself. You will be true to your friends and to yourself. And your work might make a difference." He concluded with words that would guide many for the rest of their lives: "To be or to do? Which way will you go?" This question cuts to the heart of purpose. Boyd understood that if we are not careful, we can easily find ourselves corrupted by the very occupation we wish to serve. The symbols of success—titles, recognition, perks—can become more important than the work itself. As Boyd would demonstrate to groups of officers, he'd write on the chalkboard in big letters: DUTY, HONOR, COUNTRY. Then he would cross those words out and replace them with: PRIDE, POWER, GREED. His point was that many systems and structures we navigate to get ahead can corrupt the very values we set out to serve. This is what ego does. It crosses out what matters and replaces it with what doesn't. It confuses being somebody with doing something meaningful. The question that Boyd puts before us comes down to purpose. What is your purpose? What are you here to do? If your purpose is something larger than yourself—to accomplish something, to prove something to yourself—then suddenly everything becomes both easier and more difficult. Easier because you know what is important to you. The other "choices" wash away as distractions. Harder because each opportunity must be evaluated along strict guidelines: Does this help me do what I have set out to do? This fork in the road isn't just for military officers. It appears before all of us, repeatedly, throughout our lives. To be or to do—which way will you go?

Chapter 4: The Student Mindset: Embracing Continuous Learning

In the early 1980s, a young guitarist named Kirk Hammett received the opportunity of a lifetime. He was invited to join Metallica, a rising thrash metal band, replacing their original guitarist Dave Mustaine. For many musicians, this would have been the moment to celebrate having "made it." But Hammett made a surprising decision that revealed his true character. Despite joining his dream group and literally turning professional, Hammett insisted that he needed more instruction—that he was still a student. He sought out Joe Satriani, a renowned guitar teacher who worked with musical prodigies. This was an unusual choice, as Satriani's playing style differed significantly from the thrash metal genre Hammett was pursuing. But that was precisely the point—Kirk wanted to learn what he didn't know, to firm up his understanding of fundamentals. Satriani later explained what separated Hammett from others: "He was a good student. Many of his friends and contemporaries would storm out complaining thinking I was too harsh a teacher." Satriani's system was clear: there would be weekly lessons that must be learned, and if they weren't, Hammett was wasting everyone's time. For two years, Kirk faithfully returned every week for objective feedback, judgment, and drilling in technique and musical theory—even as he was performing in front of thousands of fans. The power of being a student isn't just that it's an extended period of instruction. It also places ego and ambition in someone else's hands. There is a sort of ego ceiling imposed—one knows that he is not better than the "master" he apprentices under. You cannot fake or bluff your way through. An education can't be "hacked"; there are no shortcuts besides working at it every single day. This mindset isn't limited to music. The mixed martial arts champion Frank Shamrock has a system he calls "plus, minus, and equal." Each fighter, to become great, needs someone better to learn from, someone lesser to teach, and someone equal to challenge themselves against. The purpose is to get real and continuous feedback about what they know and don't know from every angle. "False ideas about yourself destroy you," Shamrock observed. "For me, I always stay a student. That's what martial arts are about, and you have to use that humility as a tool." A true student is like a sponge. Absorbing what goes on around them, filtering it, latching onto what they can hold. A student is self-critical and self-motivated, always trying to improve their understanding to move on to the next challenge. A real student is also their own teacher and critic. There is no room for ego there. The art of taking feedback—particularly harsh and critical feedback—is a crucial skill in life. We must not only take this feedback but actively solicit it, especially when our friends, family, and inner voice are telling us we're doing great. Ego avoids such feedback at all costs. It thinks it already knows how and who we are. It prefers its own assessment to reality. The question is: are you willing to put your ego aside and truly become a student of your craft?

Chapter 5: Passion with Boundaries: Finding Direction Through Purpose

"You seem to want that vivida vis animi which spurs and excites most young men to please, to shine, to excel," Lord Chesterfield once wrote. "Without the desire and the pains necessary to be considerable, depend upon it, you never can be so." Today, we hear a similar message everywhere: Find your passion. Live passionately. Inspire the world with your passion. People attend events like Burning Man, TED, and SXSW to find or rekindle their passion. But what if passion—at least in its unbounded form—is actually holding you back? Consider Eleanor Roosevelt's response when a visitor spoke of her "passionate interest" in a piece of social legislation, intending it as a compliment. "Yes," Roosevelt acknowledged that she supported the cause, "But I hardly think the word 'passionate' applies to me." As a genteel, accomplished woman, Roosevelt was above passion. She had purpose. She had direction. She wasn't driven by passion, but by reason. In contrast, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld were passionate about Iraq. Christopher McCandless was bursting with passion as he headed "into the wild." Robert Falcon Scott was bitten with "the Pole mania" as he set out to explore the Arctic. The inventors and investors of the Segway believed passionately they had a world-changing innovation. All were fervent believers in what they sought to do—and all were unprepared and incapable of grasping the objections and concerns of everyone around them. Passion is often a mask for weakness. Its breathlessness and impetuousness are poor substitutes for discipline, mastery, and perseverance. The basketball player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar described his famous coach John Wooden as "dispassionate." Wooden wasn't about rah-rah speeches or inspiration. He saw those extra emotions as a burden. His philosophy was about being in control and doing your job, never being "passion's slave." What matters in our ascent is purpose and realism. Purpose is like passion with boundaries. Realism is detachment and perspective. When we are young, or when our cause is young, passion runs strongest. It seems wrong to take it slow. But this is just our impatience, our inability to see that burning ourselves out isn't going to hurry the journey along. Purpose is about pursuing something outside yourself as opposed to pleasuring yourself. It deemphasizes the "I." More than purpose, we also need realism. Where do we start? What do we do first? What do we do right now? How are we sure that what we're doing is moving us forward? "Great passions are maladies without hope," Goethe once said. A deliberate, purposeful person operates beyond the sway of passion's sickness. They hire professionals and use them. They ask questions, they ask what could go wrong, they ask for examples. They plan for contingencies. Then they are off to the races, usually with small steps, completing them and looking for feedback on how the next set can be better. Is an iterative approach less exciting than manifestos, epiphanies, and dramatic gestures? Of course. Is it less glamorous than going all in and maxing out your credit cards because you believe in yourself? Absolutely. But passion is form over function. Purpose is function, function, function. Leave passion for the amateurs. Make it about what you feel you must do and say, not what you care about and wish to be. Remember Talleyrand's advice for diplomats: "Above all, not too much zeal." Then you will do great things.

Chapter 6: Managing Success: The Dangers of Entitlement and Control

In 1924, Howard Hughes Sr., a successful inventor and tool magnate, died suddenly from a heart attack. His son, a quiet, reserved boy of just eighteen, inherited three-fourths of the private company, worth nearly $1 million. In a move of remarkable foresight, the young Hughes bought out his relatives to control the entire company himself. It was a bold move for someone with zero business experience. With similar boldness, Hughes went on to create one of the most embarrassing, wasteful, and dishonest business track records in history. Though undeniably gifted, visionary, and brilliant, his years at the helm of the Hughes empire resembled a deranged crime spree more than a capitalistic enterprise. After purchasing his father's tool company, Hughes abandoned it almost immediately except to repeatedly siphon off its cash. He moved to Los Angeles to become a film producer and celebrity. His most well-known movie, "Hell's Angels," took three years to make, lost $1.5 million on a budget of $4.2 million, and nearly bankrupted the tool company. He then entered aviation, creating Hughes Aircraft Company. Despite some personal achievements as an inventor, his company was a failure. The Spruce Goose—one of the biggest planes ever made—took more than five years to develop, cost roughly $20 million, and flew just a single time for barely a mile. There was a scene from Howard's slow descent into madness that bears illustrating. His biographers describe him sitting naked in his favorite white chair, unwashed, working around the clock to battle lawyers and investigations. One minute he would dictate some irrational memo about Kleenex or food preparation, and then turn around and seize upon a genuinely brilliant strategy to outrun his creditors. It was as if, they observed, "IBM had deliberately established a pair of subsidiaries, one to produce computers and profits, another to manufacture Edsels and losses." This image perfectly captures ego's destructive power: a man working furiously with one hand toward a goal and with the other working equally hard to undermine it. Hughes, like all of us, was not completely crazy or completely sane. His ego, fueled by physical injuries and various addictions, led him into a darkness that we can scarcely comprehend. Howard Hughes, like so many wealthy people, died in an asylum of his own making. He felt little joy. He enjoyed almost nothing of what he had. Most importantly, he wasted. He wasted so much talent, so much bravery, and so much energy. Without virtue and training, Aristotle observed, "it is hard to bear the results of good fortune suitably." We can learn from Hughes because he was so publicly unable to bear his birthright properly. His endless taste for the spotlight, no matter how unflattering, gives us an opportunity to see our own tendencies reflected back through his tumultuous life. As our power or talents grow, we like to think that makes us special—that we live in blessed, unprecedented times. With accomplishment comes a growing pressure to pretend that we know more than we do. But knowledge puffs up (scientia infla). That's the worry and the risk—thinking that we're set and secure, when in reality understanding and mastery is a fluid, continual process. Success is intoxicating, yet to sustain it requires sobriety. We can't keep learning if we think we already know everything. We cannot buy into myths we make ourselves, or the noise and chatter of the outside world. We must understand that we are a small part of an interconnected universe. The verdict on Hughes is in. Ego wrecked him. A similar judgment awaits us all at some point.

Chapter 7: Resilience in Failure: Turning Setbacks into Growth

For the first half of her life, Katharine Graham saw pretty much everything go right. Her father, Eugene Meyer, was a financial genius who made a fortune in the stock market. Her mother was a brilliant socialite. As a child, Katharine had the best of everything. When her father bought the Washington Post, she inherited it and handed over management to her impressive husband, Philip Graham. Then life took a turn. Phil's behavior became increasingly erratic. He drank heavily, made reckless business decisions, began having affairs, and publicly humiliated his wife. After a severe mental breakdown, he killed himself with a hunting rifle while she napped in the next room. In 1963, at forty-six years old, Katharine Graham, a mother of three with no work experience, found herself in charge of the Washington Post Company, a vast corporation with thousands of employees. She was unprepared, timid, and naive. This was just the beginning of a series of trying events that lasted nearly two decades. As she settled into leadership, Graham found the paper's conservative board was a constant obstacle. Against their advice, she replaced the well-liked executive editor with an unknown young upstart. When the Post received stolen government documents (the Pentagon Papers), she consulted the company's lawyers and the board. All advised against publishing—fearing it could sink the IPO or tie the company up in lawsuits. Torn, she decided to proceed anyway. Shortly thereafter, the paper's investigation of Watergate threatened to put the company permanently at odds with the White House. At one point, Nixon's attorney general threatened that Graham had so overreached that her "tit" was going to be "caught in a big fat wringer." The White House was explicitly strategizing how to hurt the Post. On top of that, the Post's stock price was less than stellar. In 1974, an investor began aggressively buying up shares, potentially signaling a hostile takeover. The following year, the paper's printers' union began a vicious strike. At one point, union members wore shirts that said, "Phil Shot the Wrong Graham." Despite these tactics, she decided to fight the strike. They fought back, sabotaging company machinery and setting a printing press on fire. Then, major investors began selling their stock positions in the Washington Post Company. Graham, pushed by the activist investor she'd met earlier (who turned out to be Warren Buffett), decided to spend an enormous amount of the company's money to buy back its own shares—a dangerous move that almost no one was doing at the time. Because of Graham's perseverance, it all worked out better than anyone could have predicted. The Pentagon Papers became one of the most important stories in journalism history. The Watergate reporting changed American history and won a Pulitzer Prize. Buffett became her business mentor and an enormous advocate. Her stock buybacks made the company billions. If you'd invested $1 in the Post's IPO in 1971, it would be worth $89 by the time Graham stepped down in 1993—compared to $14 for her industry and $5 for the S&P 500. Football coach Bill Walsh says, "Almost always, your road to victory goes through a place called 'failure.'" In order to taste success again, we've got to understand what led to this moment of difficulty, what went wrong and why. We must deal with the situation to move past it. Life isn't fair. Ego loves this notion, the idea that something is "fair" or not. Psychologists call it narcissistic injury when we take personally totally indifferent and objective events. Whether what you're going through is your fault or your problem doesn't matter, because it's yours to deal with right now. What did Graham need through all this? Not swagger. Not bluster. She needed to be strong. She needed confidence and a willingness to endure. A sense of right and wrong. Purpose. It wasn't about her. It was about preserving her family's legacy. Protecting the paper. Doing her job. When you face difficulty, particularly public difficulty, your ego will show its true colors. It will say: I knew you couldn't do it. Why did you ever try? It claims: This isn't worth it. This isn't fair. This is somebody else's problem. It adds self-injury to every injury you experience. Humble and strong people don't have the same trouble with these troubles that egotists do. There are fewer complaints and far less self-immolation. Instead, there's stoic—even cheerful—resilience.

Summary

The essence of mastering ego lies in a profound truth: ego is the enemy at every stage of our journey. In aspiration, it makes us talk instead of work, seek shortcuts instead of mastery, and chase validation instead of excellence. In success, it blinds us to our weaknesses, disconnects us from others, and makes us believe our own mythology. In failure, it prevents us from learning, adapting, and rising again with wisdom. Begin by practicing radical self-awareness—notice when you're seeking praise rather than progress, when you're choosing to talk rather than act, when you're blaming others rather than taking responsibility. Develop the habit of stepping back from your achievements to ask what you still don't know. Create systems to receive honest feedback, especially when things are going well. And when facing setbacks, train yourself to ask "What can I learn?" rather than "Why me?" Remember that ego demands the world conform to your expectations, while humility allows you to conform to reality. The path of lasting achievement isn't about becoming somebody; it's about doing something meaningful with the talents you've been given.

About Author

Loading...

Ryan Holiday

Ryan Holiday is media strategist for notorious clients like Tucker Max and Dov Charney. After dropping out of college at 19 to apprentice under the strategist Robert Greene, he went on to advise many bestselling authors and multi-platinum musicians. He is the Director of Marketing at American Apparel, where his work in advertising was internationally known. His strategies are used as case studies by Twitter, YouTube, and Google, and have been written about in AdAge, the New York Times, Gawker, and Fast Company. He is the author is *Trust Me, I'm Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator*, which is due out in July. He currently lives in New Orleans, with his rebellious puppy, Hanno.

Read more

Related Books by Ryan Holiday

Loading...

Stillness Is the Key

Ryan Holiday

Timeless Stoic and Buddhist philosophy

★★★★½4.6

Loading...

Discipline Is Destiny

Ryan Holiday

The Power of Self-Control

★★★★½4.7

Loading...

Lives of the Stoics

Ryan Holiday

The Art of Living from Zeno to Marcus Aurelius

★★★★☆4.4

Loading...

The Daily Stoic

Ryan Holiday

366 Meditations on Wisdom, Perseverance and the Art of Living

★★★★½4.7

Loading...

The Obstacle is the Way

Ryan Holiday

The Timeless Art of Turning Trials Into Triumph

★★★★½4.6