The Case for Trump

The Case for Trump Plot Summary

Introduction

The election of Donald Trump in 2016 represented a seismic shift in American politics that continues to reverberate through the nation's institutions and culture. This unprecedented disruption of political norms revealed deep fractures in American society that had been developing for decades but were largely unacknowledged by political and media elites. Trump's rise exposed fundamental divisions along lines of geography, education, cultural values, and economic experience that transcend traditional partisan categories and challenge conventional political analysis. At its core, the Trump phenomenon represents a populist revolt against globalization and its perceived beneficiaries - coastal elites, multinational corporations, and international institutions. By examining Trump's appeal through multiple lenses - cultural, economic, institutional, and ideological - we gain insight into the legitimate grievances that fueled his rise while also understanding the profound challenges his brand of politics poses to democratic norms and national unity. This multidimensional analysis moves beyond simplistic narratives of demagoguery or economic anxiety to reveal how Trump's presidency has fundamentally altered American political alignments in ways that will shape governance for generations to come.

Chapter 1: America's Cultural Divide: How Trump Exposed National Fractures

The 2016 election revealed a profound cultural divide in American society that transcended traditional political boundaries. This division manifested geographically as a split between coastal metropolitan areas and the interior heartland, but it represented something deeper than mere regional differences. It exposed competing visions of American identity, values, and the proper direction of the country that had been developing for decades but crystallized during Trump's candidacy. On one side stood what might be termed "elite coastal liberals" - predominantly urban, college-educated professionals concentrated in major metropolitan areas along the coasts. This demographic typically embraced globalization, diversity, and progressive social values. They viewed America's increasing pluralism as a strength and tended to support policies promoting international cooperation, environmental protection, and expanded rights for marginalized groups. Their worldview was cosmopolitan, emphasizing connections beyond national borders and skepticism toward traditional institutions and hierarchies. Opposing them were working-class and rural Americans, particularly in the Midwest, South, and Appalachia, who felt economically and culturally marginalized. Many had experienced the devastating effects of deindustrialization as manufacturing jobs disappeared overseas. They perceived rapid demographic and social changes as threats to their way of life and values. This group tended to emphasize national sovereignty, traditional social norms, and economic security. They often viewed coastal elites as condescending and out of touch with the realities of middle America. Education emerged as a particularly significant fault line in this cultural divide. College education increasingly correlated with Democratic voting patterns, while those without degrees gravitated toward Republicans. This split reflected not just differences in economic opportunity but divergent cultural values and life experiences. Universities, once seen as engines of upward mobility, became symbols of elitism and progressive indoctrination in the eyes of many working-class Americans. Trump's explicit appeals to the "forgotten Americans" and his willingness to violate norms of political correctness resonated with those who felt their voices had been silenced in mainstream cultural discourse. Media consumption patterns both reflected and reinforced these divisions. Americans increasingly inhabited separate information ecosystems, with conservatives gravitating toward Fox News and talk radio while liberals consumed MSNBC, NPR, and mainstream newspapers. Social media algorithms further entrenched these divisions by feeding users content that confirmed their existing beliefs. Trump exploited and exacerbated these divisions through his attacks on "fake news" and his direct communication with supporters via Twitter, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers entirely. Religion and secularism further demarcated these cultural camps. Rural and working-class communities often maintained stronger religious affiliations and traditional values, while coastal urban areas tended toward greater secularism and social liberalism. Issues like abortion, LGBTQ rights, and religious liberty became flashpoints in this cultural conflict, with each side viewing the other as fundamentally misguided or threatening to their core values. Trump, despite his personal history, successfully positioned himself as a defender of religious liberty and traditional values against progressive secular encroachment.

Chapter 2: Economic Nationalism: Challenging Globalist Consensus on Trade and Immigration

Economic nationalism formed the cornerstone of Trump's policy agenda, representing a dramatic departure from decades of bipartisan consensus on globalization and free trade. Trump rejected the prevailing orthodoxy that free trade inevitably benefits all Americans, instead arguing that poorly negotiated agreements had devastated manufacturing communities and transferred wealth from middle America to coastal elites and foreign competitors. This perspective resonated powerfully with voters in deindustrialized regions who had experienced economic decline despite repeated assurances from both parties that globalization would ultimately benefit everyone. At the heart of Trump's economic vision was a fundamental skepticism toward multilateral trade agreements. He characterized deals like NAFTA and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership as "disasters" that prioritized abstract economic theories over the concrete interests of American workers. His administration withdrew from TPP negotiations, renegotiated NAFTA into the USMCA, and engaged in confrontational trade tactics with China, including the imposition of significant tariffs. These actions reflected Trump's belief that previous administrations had naively allowed other nations to take advantage of American markets while protecting their own industries. Immigration policy became inextricably linked with Trump's economic nationalism. His campaign promise to build a wall along the southern border symbolized his broader commitment to restricting immigration, which he portrayed as harmful to American workers' wages and job prospects. This stance represented a rejection of the business-friendly Republican approach that had previously favored relatively open immigration policies to ensure access to inexpensive labor. Instead, Trump aligned immigration restrictions with worker protection, arguing that limiting the supply of foreign labor would drive up wages for native-born Americans. Trump's approach to China represented his most significant break with establishment thinking on trade. Rather than viewing China's economic rise as an opportunity for mutually beneficial exchange, Trump portrayed it as an existential threat to American prosperity and security. He accused China of currency manipulation, intellectual property theft, and unfair trading practices. The resulting trade war, while causing short-term economic disruption, signaled a fundamental shift in how America engaged with its largest trading partner and reflected Trump's willingness to accept economic pain in pursuit of what he viewed as long-term strategic advantage. The intellectual foundations of Trump's economic nationalism drew from various traditions but represented a clear break from both conservative free-market orthodoxy and progressive internationalism. His approach echoed earlier American protectionist policies from the 19th century and drew inspiration from economic nationalists like Alexander Hamilton. By prioritizing national economic interests over global economic efficiency, Trump challenged fundamental assumptions that had guided American trade policy since the end of World War II. This shift forced economists and policy experts to reconsider the distributional consequences of trade policies that had previously been evaluated primarily on their aggregate effects. Trump's economic nationalism ultimately succeeded in shifting the Overton window on trade and immigration policy across the political spectrum. Even Democratic politicians began adopting more skeptical positions on free trade agreements and acknowledging the legitimate concerns of workers displaced by globalization. This realignment suggests that regardless of Trump's electoral fate, his challenge to globalist economic consensus has permanently altered American political discourse on these issues, forcing both parties to address the concrete impacts of trade and immigration policies on specific communities rather than relying on abstract economic theories.

Chapter 3: The Establishment's Failure: How Both Parties Lost Working-Class Voters

For decades prior to Trump's rise, both major political parties gradually disconnected from the concerns and interests of working-class Americans. The Democratic Party, once the champion of blue-collar workers, underwent a significant transformation beginning in the 1990s. Under Bill Clinton's leadership, Democrats embraced globalization, free trade, and financial deregulation—policies that benefited coastal professionals and financial interests while often harming manufacturing communities. This "New Democrat" approach prioritized college-educated professionals over the party's traditional working-class base. The shift continued under Barack Obama, whose administration emphasized identity politics and cultural progressivism while pursuing trade policies and immigration approaches that many working-class voters viewed as threatening their economic interests. Democratic rhetoric increasingly reflected the values and priorities of educated urban professionals rather than those of rural and working-class communities. Party leaders seemed more comfortable discussing climate change, gender identity, and racial justice than addressing the economic insecurity facing many American families. This cultural disconnect alienated traditional Democratic voters who felt the party no longer represented their interests or respected their values. Republicans, meanwhile, offered little meaningful alternative. The GOP establishment remained committed to free-market orthodoxy, advocating tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation, and free trade regardless of their impact on working communities. Despite rhetoric celebrating "Main Street values," Republican economic policies often benefited Wall Street and corporate interests at the expense of workers. The party's donor class consistently prioritized business interests over the economic concerns of their working-class voters. When workers lost jobs to outsourcing or automation, the Republican response typically emphasized retraining or relocation rather than questioning the economic model itself. On cultural issues, Republicans often paid lip service to traditional values while doing little to address the genuine concerns of religious and socially conservative voters. The party establishment seemed uncomfortable with the cultural grievances of its base, preferring to focus on tax policy and deregulation. This created a growing disconnect between GOP leaders and their voters, who increasingly felt that Republican elites were using cultural issues to win elections while governing primarily in the interests of donors and corporations. The bipartisan consensus on immigration further demonstrated the establishment's disconnect from working-class concerns. Both parties supported policies that increased labor market competition for less-educated workers while benefiting employers seeking cheaper labor. Democrats framed opposition to immigration as xenophobia, while Republicans dismissed economic concerns about immigration as protectionism. Neither party adequately addressed the legitimate economic and cultural anxieties that immigration policies generated among working-class voters. This dual abandonment created the political opening that Trump exploited. By rejecting both Democratic cultural progressivism and Republican economic orthodoxy, Trump offered a new political alignment that directly addressed working-class concerns. His willingness to challenge free trade, question immigration policies, and reject political correctness resonated with voters who felt betrayed by both parties. Trump's success revealed the profound failure of the political establishment to represent the interests and values of a significant portion of the American electorate, particularly those without college degrees who had suffered from economic dislocation and cultural marginalization.

Chapter 4: Beyond Personality: Trump's Substantive Policy Achievements and Approach

While media coverage often focused on Trump's controversial personality and rhetoric, his presidency produced substantial policy changes that reflected his nationalist vision. Tax reform represented one of his most significant domestic achievements, delivering the largest corporate tax cut in American history while also reducing individual rates. This legislation aimed to stimulate economic growth, encourage business investment, and make American companies more competitive internationally. Combined with an aggressive deregulatory agenda that eliminated or modified hundreds of federal rules, these policies contributed to strong pre-pandemic economic performance, including record-low unemployment rates for multiple demographic groups. Trump's trade policies marked a decisive break from decades of bipartisan consensus. He withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, renegotiated NAFTA into the USMCA, imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, and threatened additional trade actions against European and Asian trading partners. These moves reflected Trump's transactional approach to international economic relations and his prioritization of manufacturing jobs over abstract free-trade principles. While economists debated their long-term impact, these policies signaled a fundamental shift in America's approach to global trade, one that emphasized bilateral negotiations and specific outcomes over multilateral frameworks and process. In foreign policy, Trump pursued a distinctive approach that combined assertiveness with restraint. He increased defense spending while avoiding new large-scale military interventions. His administration eliminated ISIS's territorial caliphate, conducted targeted strikes against adversaries like Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, and brokered the Abraham Accords between Israel and several Arab states. Simultaneously, Trump questioned traditional alliance structures, demanding greater contributions from NATO partners and initiating negotiations with North Korea. This approach reflected Trump's skepticism of open-ended foreign commitments and his preference for concrete results over diplomatic process. Immigration enforcement represented another area of significant policy change. The administration expanded border barriers, implemented stricter asylum policies, reduced refugee admissions, and increased interior enforcement actions. These measures aimed to reassert control over immigration flows and prioritize American workers' interests. While court challenges and congressional opposition limited some initiatives, the administration succeeded in reducing illegal border crossings and reorienting immigration policy toward greater selectivity and enforcement. Energy policy under Trump emphasized domestic production and regulatory relief. The administration approved pipeline projects, opened federal lands for energy development, and withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement. These actions reflected Trump's prioritization of energy independence and economic growth over environmental concerns. By the end of his term, the United States had become the world's largest producer of oil and natural gas, fundamentally altering its geopolitical position in energy markets. Judicial appointments constituted perhaps Trump's most lasting legacy. He appointed three Supreme Court justices and over 230 federal judges, transforming the judiciary for decades to come. These appointments generally reflected originalist and textualist legal philosophies that emphasized judicial restraint and constitutional limitations on government power. The conservative transformation of the federal judiciary represented the fulfillment of a key campaign promise and demonstrated Trump's ability to work effectively with Senate Republicans despite personal conflicts.

Chapter 5: Deep State Tensions: Bureaucracy vs. Democratic Accountability

The tension between unelected bureaucracy and democratic governance emerged as a central theme in Trump's political narrative. He popularized the term "deep state" to describe a permanent administrative apparatus that operates largely beyond democratic control. This concept resonated with many Americans who perceived government agencies as unresponsive to their concerns and unaccountable to elected officials. Trump argued that career bureaucrats in federal agencies often pursued their own institutional interests and ideological agendas rather than implementing the policies preferred by democratically elected leaders. This critique extended beyond typical conservative complaints about big government to encompass intelligence agencies, law enforcement, diplomatic corps, and regulatory bodies. Trump contended that these institutions had developed their own cultures, priorities, and methods of operation that made them resistant to direction from elected officials. The bureaucracy's ability to slow-walk, reinterpret, or effectively block presidential directives represented, in this view, a fundamental challenge to democratic governance. Career officials could use their expertise, institutional knowledge, and control over implementation to thwart policies they opposed, regardless of electoral outcomes. The intelligence community became a particular focus of this critique. Trump's supporters pointed to instances where intelligence agencies appeared to operate according to their own priorities rather than serving elected leadership. Controversies surrounding surveillance practices, intelligence leaks, and the origins of investigations into Trump's campaign reinforced perceptions of intelligence agencies as political actors rather than neutral public servants. The spectacle of former intelligence officials becoming media commentators critical of the administration further blurred the line between intelligence professionals and political activists. Regulatory agencies presented another dimension of the deep state challenge. Trump argued that unelected regulators had accumulated enormous power to make rules that affected everyday life without sufficient democratic oversight. The administrative state's growth had created a parallel system of governance where important decisions were made by career officials rather than elected representatives. Trump's deregulatory agenda thus represented not just an economic policy but an attempt to reassert democratic control over the regulatory apparatus. The justice system similarly featured in Trump's critique of unaccountable power. He contended that prosecutors and investigators wielded enormous discretion that could be used for political purposes. The special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election became, for Trump and his supporters, a prime example of the deep state in action—career officials using their authority to target political opponents. Whether these perceptions were accurate or not, they reflected a genuine concern about the tension between professional law enforcement and democratic accountability. Trump's confrontation with the administrative state highlighted fundamental questions about American governance. In a complex modern society, specialized expertise is necessary for effective governance, yet bureaucratic autonomy can undermine democratic control. Trump's presidency brought this tension into sharp relief, forcing a national conversation about the proper balance between professional administration and democratic responsiveness. His willingness to challenge established bureaucratic norms and procedures, while controversial, addressed legitimate concerns about the democratic deficit in modern administrative governance.

Chapter 6: Redefining Conservatism: Trump's Transformation of Republican Politics

Trump's presidency catalyzed a profound transformation of American conservatism, challenging long-established orthodoxies and reconfiguring the Republican coalition. Traditional conservative principles of free trade, limited government, and robust international engagement gave way to economic nationalism, cultural populism, and skepticism toward global institutions. This ideological shift reflected Trump's intuitive understanding that many Republican voters, particularly those without college degrees, prioritized cultural identity and economic security over abstract free-market principles. The Republican Party's demographic composition underwent significant changes under Trump. The party accelerated its transition from a coalition dominated by business interests, suburban professionals, and religious conservatives to one increasingly centered on rural and working-class voters without college degrees. This shift manifested geographically as Republicans lost ground in affluent suburbs while gaining strength in previously Democratic rural areas and small manufacturing towns. These changes represented the culmination of longer-term trends but were dramatically accelerated by Trump's explicit appeals to working-class concerns and cultural grievances. Trump's presidency exposed tensions between different conservative factions that had previously maintained an uneasy alliance. Establishment conservatives, libertarians, and national security hawks found themselves increasingly marginalized as populist and nationalist voices gained prominence. Publications like National Review and The Weekly Standard, once considered authoritative voices of conservatism, lost influence to newer media platforms more aligned with Trump's approach. This realignment generated the "Never Trump" movement of conservative intellectuals and former officials who rejected Trump as fundamentally incompatible with conservative principles. The judiciary emerged as perhaps Trump's most enduring legacy for American conservatism. Working closely with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Trump appointed three Supreme Court justices and over 230 federal judges, dramatically reshaping the federal judiciary. These appointments, largely drawn from the Federalist Society's network of conservative legal talent, ensured that originalist and textualist approaches to constitutional interpretation would dominate for a generation. This judicial transformation fulfilled a key promise to religious conservatives who had initially been skeptical of Trump's personal morality. Trump's combative communication style fundamentally altered conservative political rhetoric. His willingness to directly attack opponents, use provocative language, and violate norms of civility created a template that many Republican candidates subsequently adopted. This approach prioritized emotional resonance and tribal loyalty over policy detail and ideological consistency. While critics viewed this shift as degrading political discourse, supporters saw it as necessary to counter progressive cultural dominance and media bias. Perhaps most significantly, Trump redefined the relationship between conservatism and populism in American politics. Rather than positioning conservatism as a philosophy of restraint and tradition opposed to popular passions, Trump presented it as a vehicle for expressing the legitimate grievances of ordinary Americans against elite institutions. This populist reframing helped Republicans appeal to voters who felt economically and culturally marginalized but did not necessarily embrace traditional conservative economic policies. The resulting synthesis of cultural conservatism, economic nationalism, and anti-elite rhetoric created a potent political formula that will likely influence Republican politics long after Trump's presidency.

Summary

The Trump phenomenon represents a pivotal moment in American political history that cannot be understood through conventional analytical frameworks. Trump's disruption of established norms, institutions, and coalitions revealed underlying tensions that had been building for decades but were largely unacknowledged by political and media elites. His presidency exposed fundamental divisions in American society along lines of geography, education, cultural values, and economic experience that transcend traditional partisan categories. The lasting significance of Trump's political impact lies not merely in policy achievements or failures, but in his fundamental reorientation of political discourse and party alignments. By challenging core assumptions about globalization, immigration, trade, and American leadership, Trump forced a reconsideration of ideas that had dominated both parties for generations. Whether his approach represents a temporary deviation or a permanent realignment remains uncertain, but the political landscape has been irrevocably altered. Future leaders will need to address the legitimate grievances Trump identified while developing more sustainable and unifying approaches to governance in an increasingly polarized nation.

About Author

Loading...

Victor Davis Hanson

Hanson was educated at the University of California, Santa Cruz (BA, Classics, 1975), the American School of Classical Studies (1978-79) and received his Ph.D. in Classics from Stanford University in 1980. He lives and works with his family on their forty-acre tree and vine farm near Selma, California, where he was born in 1953.

Read more

Related Books by Victor Davis Hanson

Loading...

The Dying Citizen

Victor Davis Hanson

How Progressive Elites, Tribalism, and Globalization Are Destroying the Idea of America

★★½☆☆2.8