The House of Morgan

The House of Morgan Plot Summary

Introduction

In the autumn of 1907, as panic swept through Wall Street and banks failed across America, one man stood at the center of the financial storm. J. Pierpont Morgan, then 70 years old, summoned the nation's leading bankers to his library and locked them inside until they pledged enough money to save the financial system. With no central bank to provide emergency funds, this imposing private banker single-handedly decided which institutions would survive and which would perish. This extraordinary moment captures the essence of financial power that once resided not in government institutions but in private banking dynasties. The story of the House of Morgan reveals how banking evolved through three distinct eras: the "Baronial Age" when powerful banking families wielded unprecedented influence over nations and industries; the "Diplomatic Age" when bankers functioned as quasi-statesmen in international affairs; and finally the modern "Casino Age" when relationship banking gave way to complex global trading. Through economic panics, world wars, and regulatory battles, this narrative illuminates the fundamental tension between private financial power and public governance that continues to shape our world. For anyone seeking to understand how financial institutions both reflect and influence the course of history, this chronicle of banking's most influential dynasty offers invaluable insights into the evolution of global capitalism.

Chapter 1: The Baronial Age: J.P. Morgan's Rise to Financial Dominance (1838-1913)

The story of the House of Morgan begins not with J.P. Morgan himself, but with George Peabody, a Massachusetts merchant who established a London banking house in 1838. At that time, America was a developing nation hungry for European capital, and Peabody positioned himself as the perfect intermediary between British investors and American enterprises. When Junius Spencer Morgan joined Peabody's firm in 1854, he brought a stern New England character and uncompromising business ethics that would become hallmarks of the Morgan banking tradition. After Peabody's retirement in 1864, Junius renamed the firm J.S. Morgan & Co. and expanded its influence through careful relationship building with both European aristocracy and American industrialists. J. Pierpont Morgan, Junius's son, would transform this respected but modest firm into the most powerful financial institution in America. Physically imposing with piercing eyes and a bulbous, reddened nose (the result of a skin condition called rhinophyma), Pierpont commanded respect and fear in equal measure. His power grew through a series of financial crises where he demonstrated his ability to stabilize markets and rescue failing institutions. During the Panic of 1893, he organized a syndicate to supply gold to the U.S. Treasury, effectively saving the government from bankruptcy. In 1907, with no central bank in existence, he personally coordinated the response to a severe banking panic, deciding which institutions would be saved and which would be allowed to fail. Morgan's influence extended far beyond crisis management into industrial reorganization. The late 19th century American economy was plagued by chaotic competition, particularly in the railroad industry where overbuilding and rate wars frequently led to bankruptcy. Morgan pioneered a process that became known as "Morganization" – taking control of failed railroads, eliminating wasteful competition, installing professional management, and creating stable systems that attracted long-term investors. By 1900, Morgan partners sat on the boards of 112 companies with combined assets of $22.5 billion, creating an intricate web of influence that critics viewed as a dangerous concentration of economic power. The culmination of Morgan's industrial consolidation came in 1901 with the creation of United States Steel, the world's first billion-dollar corporation. By combining Carnegie Steel with other major producers, Morgan created a colossus that controlled more than half of America's steel production. When questioned about the enormous size of this new corporation, Morgan displayed his characteristic disregard for public opinion, famously remarking: "Think of it!" This attitude reflected the baronial mindset of the era – a belief that financial power should reside with a small elite who understood business better than politicians or the general public. This concentration of power inevitably provoked a political backlash. The 1912 Pujo Committee hearings investigated what was termed the "Money Trust," with Morgan as its perceived head. Though Pierpont testified with dignity and maintained that character, not collateral, was the basis of banking, the hearings revealed the extent to which a small group of financial houses controlled American industry. When Pierpont died in 1913, his son Jack inherited not only a financial empire but also growing public hostility toward Wall Street power. The same year saw the creation of the Federal Reserve System – a direct response to the dangers of relying on private bankers like Morgan to manage financial crises. The Baronial Age was ending, and a new era of financial regulation was beginning.

Chapter 2: War and Diplomacy: Morgan's Role in Global Finance (1914-1929)

World War I transformed the House of Morgan from a powerful national bank into the central node of global finance. When war erupted in Europe in July 1914, the Morgan bank initially faced crisis as European investors rushed to liquidate American securities. However, this momentary panic quickly gave way to unprecedented opportunity. In January 1915, the British and French governments appointed J.P. Morgan & Co. as their exclusive purchasing agent in the United States. Under the leadership of Edward Stettinius Sr., the bank's "Export Department" became the single most important procurement operation in history, purchasing $3 billion in American supplies for the Allies – nearly half of all American supplies sold during the war. The war years witnessed the emergence of Thomas W. Lamont as the diplomatic face of the Morgan bank. Unlike the gruff Jack Morgan, Lamont was smooth, articulate, and politically adept. When America entered the war in 1917, Lamont served as a financial adviser to the American delegation at the Paris Peace Conference, helping to craft the financial clauses of the Treaty of Versailles. Throughout the 1920s, Lamont would function as a quasi-statesman, negotiating with governments from Japan to Italy, often with the tacit approval of the U.S. State Department. As Lamont himself acknowledged, "We did business where the State Department suggested we do business." The 1920s marked the zenith of the House of Morgan's global influence. With Europe devastated and in debt, America emerged as the world's banker, and the Morgan bank stood at the center of this new financial order. The firm orchestrated massive loans to rebuild war-torn economies, including a $100 million loan to France in 1924 and a $150 million loan to Japan after the devastating Tokyo earthquake of 1923. These financial operations were not merely commercial transactions but diplomatic initiatives that shaped international relations. When Germany struggled to meet its reparations payments, Morgan partners helped create the Dawes Plan of 1924, which restructured German debt and stabilized European finances. This period saw the Morgan bank operating in the gray area between business and politics, with partners regularly consulting with heads of state and central bankers. The firm maintained particularly close relationships with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Bank of England, creating an Anglo-American financial axis that dominated global markets. Morgan partners held positions of extraordinary influence – Russell Leffingwell advised the Treasury Department, Dwight Morrow served as Ambassador to Mexico, and Thomas Lamont negotiated directly with Mussolini and Japanese leaders. This blending of private banking and public diplomacy represented a new model of financial power. By the late 1920s, however, the foundations of this system were beginning to crack. The stock market boom fueled dangerous speculation, while Morgan partners, despite their conservatism, failed to recognize the growing bubble. The bank's close identification with international finance and the old European order became increasingly problematic as the world moved toward economic nationalism. When the crash came in October 1929, it revealed the fragility of the financial architecture they had constructed. The Diplomatic Age had reached its peak, and the House of Morgan would soon face its greatest challenge as the Great Depression engulfed the global economy.

Chapter 3: Depression and Regulation: The Divided House (1929-1940)

The Wall Street Crash of 1929 initially seemed manageable to the Morgan partners, who organized a bankers' pool to support the market – much as J. Pierpont Morgan had done in 1907. Thomas Lamont announced to the press, "There has been a little distress selling on the Stock Exchange," a statement that would come to symbolize Wall Street's initial failure to grasp the magnitude of the unfolding catastrophe. As the Depression deepened, the Morgan bank found itself in the uncomfortable position of both rescuer and victim. The firm organized bailouts for clients and fellow banks, but its own net worth dropped by half between 1929 and 1932, and its total assets fell from $704 million to $425 million. Public anger toward bankers intensified as unemployment reached 25 percent and thousands of banks failed across America. The Morgan bank became a lightning rod for this resentment, particularly after the Pecora hearings of 1933 revealed that J.P. Morgan Jr. and other partners had paid no income taxes in 1931 and 1932 by claiming investment losses. The hearings also exposed the bank's "preferred lists," which had allowed politicians and business leaders to purchase valuable stock offerings at below-market prices. These revelations devastated the bank's carefully cultivated image of probity and public service, fueling support for dramatic regulatory reform. The election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 heralded a new era of government regulation that would fundamentally challenge Morgan power. The Banking Act of 1933 (Glass-Steagall) forced the separation of commercial and investment banking, compelling the House of Morgan to split into two entities: J.P. Morgan & Co., which chose to remain a commercial bank, and Morgan Stanley, a new investment bank led by Henry S. Morgan (Jack's son) and Harold Stanley. This division shattered the integrated financial services model that had been central to Morgan's power. As partner Russell Leffingwell warned, "Our securities business is a necessary feeder to our banking business, and without it the banking business would in time dry up." The New Deal's broader regulatory framework further constrained the bank. The Securities and Exchange Commission, created in 1934, ended the era of unregulated securities markets. The Banking Act of 1935 shifted power from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where Morgan influence had been strong, to the Federal Reserve Board in Washington. The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 dismantled the utility empires that Morgan had helped build. Collectively, these reforms dramatically reduced the bank's ability to exercise the kind of unilateral power it had wielded in earlier decades. Jack Morgan and his partners viewed these changes with horror, seeing them as an attack not just on their bank but on the social order itself. Jack lamented that the country was "in the hands of its enemies" and feared that Roosevelt was leading America toward socialism. Thomas Lamont, however, proved more adaptable, gradually developing a working relationship with the Roosevelt administration despite his initial opposition to the New Deal. By 1940, the House of Morgan had been transformed from a financial colossus that could dictate terms to governments into a more conventional bank operating within strict regulatory boundaries. The era of private banker diplomacy had given way to a new age in which government, not private finance, would be the dominant force in economic management.

Chapter 4: Postwar Transformation: Adapting to a New Financial Order (1940-1970)

The death of J.P. "Jack" Morgan Jr. in March 1943 symbolically marked the end of the Morgan dynasty's direct control of the bank. His funeral at St. George's Church echoed his father's thirty years earlier, with flags at half-mast over the New York Stock Exchange. The Morgan bank that emerged from World War II faced a radically different financial landscape than the one Jack had inherited in 1913. The Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 established a new international monetary system based on fixed exchange rates and dollar convertibility to gold. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund – multilateral institutions rather than private banks – would now oversee global financial stability. Under the leadership of Henry Clay Alexander, who became chairman in 1955, J.P. Morgan & Co. began to adapt to the competitive realities of postwar banking. Alexander, a Southerner with a politician's charm, relaxed the bank's pontifical image while maintaining its focus on wholesale banking for blue-chip corporations. However, the bank's small size increasingly limited its ability to serve major corporate clients, who required larger loans than Morgan could legally provide. The solution came in 1959 with the merger with Guaranty Trust, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust Company. This combination of Morgan's prestige with Guaranty's capital produced a bank better positioned to compete in the increasingly global financial markets. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley established itself as America's premier investment bank under the leadership of Perry Hall. The firm dominated corporate securities underwriting, maintaining an aristocratic bearing that set it apart from competitors. Morgan Stanley partners maintained the old Morgan tradition of selectivity, refusing to compete for business and accepting only clients they deemed worthy. As partner Perry Hall once remarked, "We don't compete for business; we are chosen." This approach proved remarkably successful in the stable financial environment of the 1950s and early 1960s, though it would eventually be challenged by more aggressive competitors. In London, Morgan Grenfell continued as a traditional British merchant bank, maintaining close ties with both its American cousins while developing its own identity. Under the leadership of Edward Grenfell until his death in 1941, and later the Bicester and Catto families, the firm played a significant role in British corporate finance. During World War II, Morgan Grenfell's partners served in key government positions, strengthening the firm's establishment connections. After the war, it gradually expanded its activities but remained relatively small and traditional compared to its American relatives. The 1960s brought new challenges as financial markets became more competitive and globalized. The rise of institutional investors like pension funds and mutual funds diminished the power of commercial banks as intermediaries. Multinational corporations developed sophisticated treasury operations that reduced their dependence on bank financing. The emergence of the Eurodollar market – dollar deposits held in European banks, free from U.S. regulations – created alternatives to traditional banking channels. These developments forced the Morgan institutions to adapt, gradually moving away from their traditional relationship banking model toward more transaction-oriented approaches. By 1970, all three Morgan banks had been transformed from the partnership-based, relationship-focused institutions of the prewar era into more modern, corporate entities operating in an increasingly complex global environment.

Chapter 5: The Casino Age: From Relationship Banking to Global Trading (1970-1989)

The 1970s marked the beginning of what financial historians now call the "Casino Age" – a period of deregulation, innovation, and dramatically increased risk-taking across global financial markets. The collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, when President Nixon ended dollar convertibility to gold, ushered in an era of floating exchange rates and unprecedented market volatility. For the Morgan institutions, this new environment demanded fundamental transformation. No longer could they rely on traditional relationship banking and conservative practices; they needed to adapt to a world of rapid trading, complex financial instruments, and intense global competition. Morgan Guaranty, under the leadership of Lewis Preston and later Dennis Weatherstone, evolved from a traditional commercial bank into a sophisticated global trading operation. The bank developed expertise in foreign exchange, derivatives, and emerging markets, with its traders managing billions of dollars daily in the rapidly growing Euromarkets. This transformation was exemplified by Weatherstone himself – the son of a London transport worker who rose through the ranks as a foreign exchange trader rather than through traditional lending. By the late 1980s, Morgan Guaranty was earning more from trading and fee-based activities than from traditional lending spreads, a dramatic shift from its historical business model. Morgan Stanley underwent an even more radical metamorphosis. Under the leadership of Robert Baldwin in the 1970s and later S. Parker Gilbert, the firm expanded from a small, elite underwriting house into a global financial powerhouse. It developed major trading operations, created a mergers and acquisitions department under Robert Greenhill, and eventually moved into merchant banking and leveraged buyouts. The firm's headcount grew from about 200 in 1970 to over 6,000 by 1990, and it went public in 1986 to raise capital for its expanding activities. This transformation brought both profits and ethical challenges, as the firm's involvement in hostile takeovers and leveraged buyouts raised questions about conflicts of interest and social impact. Morgan Grenfell similarly transformed itself from a staid British merchant bank into an aggressive deal-making machine. Under Christopher Reeves, the firm became London's premier takeover adviser, involved in controversial battles including Guinness's acquisition of Distillers. However, this aggressive approach ultimately led to disaster when the firm became embroiled in the Guinness scandal of 1986, which revealed illegal share-support operations during the takeover. The scandal forced the resignation of key executives and ultimately led to Morgan Grenfell's acquisition by Deutsche Bank in 1989, ending its independence after 151 years. The 1987 stock market crash briefly interrupted the Casino Age but did not fundamentally alter its trajectory. Unlike in 1929, when the House of Morgan had orchestrated a private sector response, in 1987 the Federal Reserve quickly intervened to provide liquidity. This demonstrated how the financial system had evolved – central banks rather than private bankers now served as the ultimate backstop for financial markets. By 1989, all three Morgan institutions had been fundamentally transformed. They operated in a financial world characterized by enormous trading volumes, complex financial engineering, and global integration – a world very different from the relationship-based banking of earlier eras. The Morgan name still commanded respect, but it now represented a different kind of financial power – more technical, more transactional, and ultimately more fragile.

Chapter 6: Legacy and Lessons: Morgan's Impact on Modern Finance

The epic saga of the House of Morgan reveals the fundamental tension between private financial power and public governance that has shaped modern capitalism. From its origins as a conduit for European capital to America through its dominance of global finance during the Baronial Age, its fragmentation during the regulatory era, and its transformation during the Casino Age, the Morgan empire has both reflected and influenced the evolution of financial markets. At each stage, the balance between private initiative and public oversight shifted in response to crises, technological changes, and political pressures. The Morgan institutions demonstrated remarkable adaptability while maintaining certain core principles – relationship focus, emphasis on integrity, and commitment to excellence. The Morgan story offers crucial insights for understanding today's financial landscape. First, financial power inevitably concentrates unless deliberately constrained by regulation, as demonstrated by both the pre-Depression concentration and the post-1980s reconsolidation. Second, financial innovation creates both opportunities and systemic risks that require thoughtful oversight rather than either unfettered freedom or stifling restriction. Finally, the most enduring financial institutions are those that balance adaptation to changing conditions with consistency in core values. As global finance continues to evolve through technological disruption, geopolitical realignment, and environmental challenges, these lessons from the House of Morgan remain profoundly relevant for policymakers, financial professionals, and citizens seeking to harness financial power for productive purposes while preventing its potential abuses.

Summary

The House of Morgan's journey through three centuries illuminates the cyclical nature of financial power and regulation. During the Baronial Age, J.P. Morgan wielded authority that would be unimaginable for any private banker today, single-handedly stabilizing markets during crises and reshaping entire industries. The Depression-era backlash against this concentration of power produced regulations that fragmented the Morgan empire and constrained banking activities for decades. Yet by the 1980s, deregulation and globalization had enabled a new concentration of financial power, albeit in a different form – less visible but potentially more destabilizing through complex trading strategies and global interconnections. This historical progression offers profound lessons for navigating today's financial challenges. First, neither completely unfettered markets nor stifling regulation produces optimal outcomes; the most productive financial systems balance innovation with stability through thoughtful oversight. Second, financial institutions must cultivate both adaptability and core values – the Morgan banks that thrived longest were those that evolved with changing conditions while maintaining their commitment to integrity and client service. Finally, financial power must ultimately serve broader economic and social purposes to maintain its legitimacy. When banking becomes disconnected from the real economy, as happened in both the 1920s and 2000s, crisis inevitably follows. By understanding these patterns from the Morgan saga, we can better design financial systems that harness the productive power of capital while protecting against its potential excesses.

About Author

Loading...

Ron Chernow

Ron Chernow was born in 1949 in Brooklyn, New York. After graduating with honors from Yale College and Cambridge University with degrees in English Literature, he began a prolific career as a freelance journalist. Between 1973 and 1982, Chernow published over sixty articles in national publications, including numerous cover stories. In the mid-80s Chernow went to work at the Twentieth Century Fund, a prestigious New York think tank, where he served as director of financial policy studies and received what he described as “a crash course in economics and financial history.”Chernow’s journalistic talents combined with his experience studying financial policy culminated in the writing of his extraordinary first book, The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance (1990). Winner of the 1990 National Book Award for Nonfiction, The House of Morgan traces the amazing history of four generations of the J.P. Morgan empire. The New York Times Book Review wrote, “As a portrait of finance, politics and the world of avarice and ambition on Wall Street, the book has the movement and tension of an epic novel. It is, quite simply, a tour de force.” Chernow continued his exploration of famous financial dynasties with his second book, The Warburgs (1994), the story of a remarkable Jewish family. The book traces Hamburg’s most influential banking family of the 18th century from their successful beginnings to when Hitler’s Third Reich forced them to give up their business, and ultimately to their regained prosperity in America on Wall Street.Described by Time as “one of the great American biographies,” Chernow’s Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. (1998) brilliantly reveals the complexities of America’s first billionaire. Rockefeller was known as a Robber Baron, whose Standard Oil Company monopolized an entire industry before it was broken up by the famous Supreme Court anti-trust decision in 1911. At the same time, Rockefeller was one of the century’s greatest philanthropists donating enormous sums to universities and medical institutions. Chernow is the Secretary of PEN American Center, the country’s most prominent writers’ organization, and is currently at work on a biography of Alexander Hamilton. He lives in Brooklyn Heights, New York.In addition to writing biographies, Chernow is a book reviewer, essayist, and radio commentator. His book reviews and op-ed articles appear frequently in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. He comments regularly on business and finance for National Public Radio and for many shows on CNBC, CNN, and the Fox News Channel. In addition, he served as the principal expert on the A&E biography of J.P. Morgan and will be featured as the key Rockefeller expert on an upcoming CNBC documentary.

Read more

Related Books by Ron Chernow

Loading...

Titan

Ron Chernow

The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.

★★★★☆4.2

Loading...

Alexander Hamilton

Ron Chernow

The bestselling inspiration for the hit Broadway musical

★★★★☆4.2