Your Future Self

Your Future Self Plot Summary

Introduction

Walking through a dense forest, you suddenly find yourself in front of a wrought iron gate with a sign that reads "Pathway to the Future." Curious, you step through and find yourself face-to-face with an older version of yourself, twenty years in the future. What would you ask this future you? What insights might they share about your life choices, regrets, and accomplishments? Though this scenario sounds like science fiction, we engage in a similar process every day through what scientists call "mental time travel" – our mind's remarkable ability to project ourselves into the future. This capacity for mental time travel may be the defining feature of human intelligence, allowing us to make decisions today that benefit our future selves. Yet there's a fundamental disconnect: we often treat our future selves as strangers rather than as extensions of who we are now. This disconnect explains why we struggle with long-term decisions – why we choose the chocolate cake over the apple, spend rather than save, or skip the gym despite our best intentions. By understanding the psychology behind how we relate to our future selves, we can develop practical strategies to bridge this gap, making choices today that create the tomorrow we truly want. The journey through time begins not with a magical gate, but with recognizing that your future self is waiting for you to make the right decisions now.

Chapter 1: The Psychology of Future Self-Continuity

When you think about yourself ten years from now, who do you imagine? Research suggests that most people see their future selves as fundamentally different from their present selves – almost like strangers. This phenomenon, known as future self-discontinuity, occurs because our brains process information about our future selves using neural pathways similar to those we use when thinking about other people, not ourselves. In a revealing experiment, researchers placed participants in an MRI scanner and asked them to think about themselves now, themselves in the future, and other people. The brain activity when thinking about future selves looked remarkably similar to the patterns observed when thinking about strangers, and distinctly different from thinking about present selves. This neurological distance helps explain why we often make decisions that favor our present comfort over our future wellbeing. The concept of future self-continuity refers to how connected we feel to these future versions of ourselves. People with stronger connections to their future selves make more patient financial decisions, exercise more regularly, and generally engage in behaviors that benefit their long-term interests. In one study, researchers showed participants digitally aged photos of themselves. Those who saw these aged images allocated significantly more money to retirement accounts than those who only saw current images of themselves. This psychological distance isn't binary but exists on a spectrum. Some people naturally feel more connected to their future selves than others, and this connection can be strengthened through various techniques. Understanding this connection is crucial because it forms the foundation of our ability to make decisions that serve our long-term interests rather than just immediate gratification. Our relationship with our future self is ultimately about identity – do we see our future selves as extensions of who we are now, or as different people entirely? This question has profound implications for how we approach everything from saving for retirement to maintaining our health, and even to how we treat the environment and make ethical choices that affect others.

Chapter 2: Why We Disconnect from Our Future Selves

The disconnect we feel from our future selves stems from several psychological mechanisms. First, there's what researchers call the "end of history illusion" – our tendency to believe that while we've changed significantly in the past, we won't change much in the future. In one study, people in their twenties, thirties, and forties all predicted they would change far less in the next decade than people ten years older reported having actually changed. We recognize past changes but fail to anticipate future ones. Another factor is the vividness gap. Our present experiences are intensely vivid – we feel hunger, desire, exhaustion, and joy with immediate clarity. Future experiences, by contrast, are abstract and fuzzy. When faced with a delicious dessert now versus the abstract concept of better health later, the immediate temptation often wins because it feels more real. This explains why we might choose to watch Netflix instead of exercising, even though we know exercise will benefit us in the long run. Time perception also plays a crucial role. Research shows that we perceive time differently depending on whether we're looking forward or backward. A year in the future feels shorter than a year in the past, and this compressed perception of future time makes future rewards seem less valuable. When researchers asked people to mark on a line how long various time periods felt, a year in the future was perceived as much shorter than the same period in the past. Our emotional forecasting abilities are similarly flawed. We consistently underestimate how much our feelings and preferences will change over time. For instance, college students asked to predict how much they'd value certain music genres in ten years significantly underestimated how much their tastes would evolve. This poor emotional forecasting leads us to make decisions based on current preferences that our future selves may not share. These disconnects aren't just academic curiosities – they have real consequences for our lives. When we fail to connect with our future selves, we're more likely to engage in environmentally destructive behaviors, make unethical choices, accumulate debt, and neglect our health. Understanding these mechanisms is the first step toward developing strategies to overcome them and make better long-term decisions.

Chapter 3: Time Travel Mistakes: Missing the Flight

Imagine planning an elaborate vacation for months, only to miss your flight because you got distracted at the airport bar. This scenario perfectly illustrates the first major time-travel mistake we make: becoming so anchored in the present moment that we completely miss our journey to the future. Psychologists call this "present bias" – our tendency to give stronger weight to payoffs that are closer to the present time. This anchoring to the present manifests in countless daily decisions. When offered $100 today versus $120 in a month, most people choose the immediate reward, even though waiting offers a 20% return – far better than any investment. Yet interestingly, when both options are pushed into the future (like $100 in a year versus $120 in 13 months), people typically choose the larger, later amount. This preference reversal reveals how powerfully the present moment pulls at our decision-making. Why does this happen? One explanation involves the certainty of the present versus the uncertainty of the future. The present is knowable and guaranteed, while the future contains inherent risks. As an ancient proverb puts it, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." Our brains evolved in environments where immediate survival concerns trumped long-term planning, making present bias an adaptive trait that has become maladaptive in our modern world of retirement accounts and preventive healthcare. Another factor is what researchers call the "emotional magnifying glass" – our tendency to view present emotions as more intense and important than past or future ones. When we're hungry, tired, or excited, those feelings dominate our awareness, making it difficult to consider our future selves' needs. This explains why shopping while hungry leads to overfilled carts, and why important emails written in anger are best left in the drafts folder overnight. The brain systems involved in this process are well-documented. Our prefrontal cortex helps us think about the future and exercise self-control, while our dopamine system responds to immediate rewards. When the prefrontal system is taxed – through stress, distraction, or fatigue – the dopamine system tends to win, leading us to choose immediate gratification over long-term benefits. Recognizing when we're missing our flight to the future is the first step toward making better decisions. By understanding how present bias works, we can develop strategies to counteract it, ensuring we don't sacrifice our future wellbeing for momentary pleasures.

Chapter 4: Poor Trip Planning: Procrastination and Commitment

The second major time-travel mistake we make is poor trip planning – we think about the future, but not deeply or accurately enough. Procrastination exemplifies this error. When we procrastinate, we're not ignoring the future entirely; we're simply planning poorly for it, assuming our future selves will somehow be more motivated to tackle unpleasant tasks than we are now. Procrastination isn't mere laziness – it's a complex emotional regulation problem. When faced with a task that generates negative emotions (anxiety, boredom, frustration), we seek to alleviate those feelings by avoiding the task. The problem is that we fail to recognize that our future selves will experience those same negative emotions when confronted with the task later. As procrastination researcher Tim Pychyl puts it, "I know my future self isn't going to want to do this thing any more than my present self does." This poor planning extends beyond procrastination to what researchers call the "Yes/Damn effect." When asked to commit to future events – like giving a presentation next month or attending a social gathering – we often say yes because our calendars look empty and we imagine having abundant time and energy. But when that future date arrives, we find ourselves overwhelmed and regretful: "Yes, I'll do that thing. Damn! I wish I hadn't said yes." Why does this happen? Research shows we consistently underestimate how busy we'll be in the future. In one study, people rated their available time on a scale from 1 (more time available today) to 10 (more time available in a month). The average response was 8.2 – a dramatic overestimation of future time availability. We fail to account for the unexpected tasks, emergencies, and obligations that inevitably fill our days. Another factor is our difficulty simulating future emotional states. When we're rested and calm, it's hard to imagine how tired or stressed we might feel later. This "empathy gap" between our current and future emotional states leads us to make commitments that seem reasonable now but become burdensome later. Interestingly, research suggests we might make better predictions about our future experiences by listening to others rather than relying on our own simulations. In one study, women made more accurate predictions about how much they'd enjoy a speed date when they based their forecast on another woman's experience rather than their own imagination. This "surrogation" strategy – using others' experiences to predict our own – can help us plan more realistically for the future. By recognizing these planning pitfalls, we can make more thoughtful commitments, set more realistic deadlines, and develop strategies to help our future selves succeed rather than struggle.

Chapter 5: Packing the Wrong Clothes: Projection Bias

The third major time-travel mistake occurs when we "pack the wrong clothes" for our journey into the future – we project our current feelings, preferences, and circumstances onto our future selves, failing to account for how we might change. Economists call this "projection bias," and it affects countless decisions in our lives. Imagine packing for a trip from snowy Chicago to sunny Miami in February. Feeling cold at the moment of packing, you might stuff your suitcase with sweaters and jackets, forgetting that Miami's 80-degree weather will make those items unnecessary. Similarly, we make life decisions based on current emotions that our future selves won't share. Shopping while hungry, buying convertibles on unusually warm winter days, or choosing a college major based on a 7:30 AM class experience – all reflect our tendency to overproject current states onto the future. Projection bias explains why we make regrettable purchases during emotional highs (like buying expensive concert tickets for an artist we're currently obsessed with) and why we make poor health decisions during emotional lows (like abandoning exercise routines during stressful periods). Research shows that even temporary states like hunger dramatically affect our choices: people asked to select snacks for future consumption while hungry chose far more unhealthy options than those who made selections after eating. This bias extends to major life decisions as well. Studies of college students found they were about 10% less likely to major in subjects they took during early morning classes – not because the subjects were less interesting, but because students misattributed their morning grogginess to the subject matter. Similarly, reformed smokers who felt confident in their ability to resist temptation were more likely to expose themselves to triggering situations, leading to higher relapse rates. Perhaps most concerning is how projection bias affects end-of-life planning. Only about one-third of Americans have completed advance directives specifying their wishes for end-of-life care. Among those who have, many fail to update these documents as their preferences change. Research shows that while only 10% of healthy respondents said they'd want aggressive chemotherapy for a three-month life extension, 42% of actual cancer patients chose this option. As we approach life's end, our values and priorities often shift in ways our younger selves couldn't anticipate. Understanding projection bias helps us recognize when we're making decisions based on temporary states rather than enduring preferences. By acknowledging that our feelings and circumstances will change, we can make choices that better serve our future selves across different emotional landscapes and life stages.

Chapter 6: Making the Future Closer: Visualization Techniques

One powerful strategy for improving our time-travel abilities is to make our future selves feel closer and more vivid. When our future selves feel like distant strangers, it's easy to discount their needs. But when we can vividly imagine and connect with them, we're more motivated to act on their behalf. Research demonstrates this principle through what psychologists call the "identifiable victim effect." We're more moved to action by the story of a single child in need than by statistics about millions suffering. This occurs because individual stories activate empathy and perspective-taking in ways that abstract numbers cannot. The same principle applies to our future selves – the more vividly we can imagine them, the more likely we are to care about their wellbeing. One innovative approach involves using age-progression technology to show people what they'll look like decades from now. In groundbreaking studies, researchers created digitally aged avatars of participants and allowed them to interact with these future selves in virtual reality environments. The results were striking: those who "met" their future selves allocated significantly more money to retirement accounts than those who saw only current images of themselves. This effect has been replicated in multiple studies and real-world settings, including with community college students and banking customers in Mexico. Another effective technique is writing letters to your future self. This practice, which dates back centuries, creates a tangible connection across time. In one study, college students who wrote letters to themselves twenty years in the future exercised more in the following week than those who wrote to themselves just three months ahead. The exercise works best when it's a two-way conversation – writing to your future self and then responding as that future self creates an even stronger bond. Time framing also matters significantly. Research shows that thinking about the future in terms of days rather than years makes it feel closer and more urgent. People asked to consider retirement starting in 10,950 days began saving four times sooner than those thinking about retirement in 30 years, even though these timeframes are identical. Days feel short and immediate, while years feel distant and abstract. Perhaps most surprisingly, mental time travel works better in reverse. Rather than starting in the present and imagining forward, try beginning in the future and working backward to the present. This "reverse time travel" technique increases the sense of connection between present and future selves, making the journey feel shorter and more navigable – similar to how the trip home from a new destination often feels quicker than the journey there. These visualization techniques aren't just psychological tricks – they're practical tools for strengthening the connection between our present and future selves, helping us make decisions today that create the tomorrow we want.

Chapter 7: Commitment Devices: Staying the Course

Even with a vivid connection to our future selves, we still face temptations that can derail our best intentions. This is where commitment devices come in – strategies that help us "stay the course" by constraining our future choices in ways that benefit our long-term goals. The concept of commitment devices dates back centuries. In Homer's Odyssey, Odysseus had himself tied to the mast of his ship so he could hear the Sirens' song without being lured to his death. Similarly, Spanish explorer Hernán Cortés famously burned his ships upon arriving in Mexico, eliminating the possibility of retreat for his men. These historical examples illustrate the core principle: by removing future options to deviate from our plans, we can ensure better outcomes. Modern commitment devices range from simple to sophisticated. At the simplest level are "soft commitments" – psychological promises we make to ourselves or others. When you tell a friend you'll meet them at the gym at 7 AM, you're creating a soft commitment that makes it harder to back out. Research shows that even these basic commitments can be effective: employees who pre-committed to increasing their 401(k) contributions with future pay raises quadrupled their savings rates over four years. Stronger commitment devices physically remove temptations from our environment. The "Kitchen Safe" (now called KSafe) exemplifies this approach – a time-locked container that prevents access to tempting items for periods ranging from minutes to days. Once locked, the only way to access the contents before the timer expires is to break the container. Users report locking away everything from cookies and smartphones to credit cards and gaming controllers. The strongest commitment devices add punishments for deviating from our plans. Websites like Stickk.com allow users to set goals and attach financial penalties for failure – if you don't follow through, your credit card is charged and the money goes to a cause you oppose. Research shows that while only about one-third of users opt for accounts with monetary stakes, those who do are more than four times likelier to achieve their goals. The effectiveness of commitment devices depends on self-awareness. People who recognize their tendency to succumb to temptation benefit most from these strategies. In one study of a locked savings account program in the Philippines, the most self-aware consumers – those who acknowledged their self-control challenges – gained the most from the restrictive accounts. Commitment devices work best when the constraints are strong enough to be effective but not so severe that we avoid adopting them altogether. The ideal commitment device creates just enough friction to prevent impulsive decisions while still allowing us the flexibility to adjust to changing circumstances. By strategically limiting our future choices, we paradoxically increase our freedom to become the people we truly want to be.

Summary

Our relationship with our future self fundamentally shapes the quality of our lives. When we treat our future selves as strangers, we make decisions that prioritize immediate gratification over long-term wellbeing. But when we forge strong connections with these future versions of ourselves, we naturally make choices that create better outcomes across our lifespan. The strategies explored in this journey through time – from visualizing our aged selves and writing letters to our future selves, to creating commitment devices and reframing how we think about time – all serve to bridge the gap between who we are today and who we will become tomorrow. Yet perhaps the most profound insight is finding the right balance. While planning for the future is essential, living exclusively for tomorrow can rob us of present joy. The wisest approach recognizes that our future selves will value not just financial security and physical health, but also the memories, experiences, and relationships we cultivate along the way. By understanding the psychology of time travel, we can create lives that honor both our present needs and our future aspirations, ensuring that when we eventually become our future selves, we'll be grateful for the choices our past selves made.

About Author

Loading...

Hal Hershfield

Read more