Possible

Possible Plot Summary

Introduction

In today's world of increasing polarization and communication breakdowns, our ability to navigate difficult conversations has never been more critical. When tensions rise and perspectives clash, the natural tendency is to either fight back forcefully or withdraw completely—neither of which leads to meaningful resolution. What if there was a better approach, one that could transform contentious exchanges into opportunities for deeper understanding? The challenges we face in our relationships—whether personal or professional—often stem from our inability to truly hear one another. We listen to respond rather than to understand, we position ourselves on opposite sides of an issue, and we miss the opportunity to build connections that could lead to innovative solutions. By developing specific skills and adopting a mindset focused on bridging divides rather than widening them, we can create pathways to mutual understanding even in the most challenging circumstances.

Chapter 1: Pause Before Reacting

At the heart of constructive dialogue lies the crucial skill of pausing before reacting. This pause isn't merely a moment of silence, but a conscious decision to interrupt our automatic response patterns and create space for more thoughtful engagement. When faced with triggering words or actions, our brain's limbic system activates almost instantly, preparing us to fight or flee. The pause acts as a circuit breaker in this reactive process. William Ury, while mediating a high-stakes political negotiation in Venezuela, experienced this principle firsthand. During a late-night meeting with President Hugo Chávez, the leader suddenly launched into an angry tirade, shouting that Ury and other mediators were "big fools." The room tensed as cabinet ministers watched silently. Ury felt his face flush with embarrassment and anger rising within him. In that critical moment, he pinched his palm—a technique he had learned to create a moment of pause—took a deep breath, and remained silent instead of defending himself or responding with counter-accusations. Rather than escalating the confrontation, Ury continued listening as Chávez vented his frustrations. After about thirty minutes, having found no resistance to push against, the president's anger began to dissipate. His shoulders dropped slightly, and he let out a weary sigh before asking, "So, Ury, what should I do?" This subtle shift opened the door to a productive conversation about a possible Christmas truce that could ease tensions in the politically divided country. The pause creates a vital space between stimulus and response—what psychologists call the "moment of choice." In this space, we can access our rational thinking instead of being driven by emotional reactivity. To cultivate this ability, practice simple techniques like taking a deep breath, counting to ten, or physically stepping back from a heated situation. Notice the physical sensations that accompany your emotional triggers—a tightening chest, a clenched jaw, a racing heart—as these bodily signals can serve as early warning systems. When you sense these reactions beginning, explicitly name your emotions to yourself: "I'm feeling defensive right now" or "I notice I'm becoming angry." This simple act of labeling helps engage your prefrontal cortex, the brain region responsible for executive function and decision-making. Remember that pausing doesn't mean suppressing your emotions or avoiding difficult topics—it means responding from a place of choice rather than compulsion. The power of the pause lies in its simplicity yet profound impact. By creating even a few seconds of space between trigger and response, you gain the freedom to choose how you engage rather than being controlled by automatic reactions. This single practice—consistently applied—can transform your most challenging relationships and conversations from destructive confrontations into opportunities for understanding.

Chapter 2: Listen to Understand, Not to Reply

Genuine listening—the kind that transforms relationships—goes far beyond merely waiting for your turn to speak. It requires a fundamental shift from listening to formulate a reply to listening with the sincere intention to understand another person's world. This deeper form of listening involves temporarily setting aside your own perspective to fully enter the reality of someone else. Dennis Rodman, the former NBA star known for his unconventional friendship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, provided an unexpected window into this principle. When tensions between North Korea and the United States reached dangerous levels in 2017, researcher William Ury recognized that Rodman might offer unique insights into Kim's psychology. After persistent efforts to arrange a meeting, Ury finally connected with Rodman at a Hollywood mansion. Though initially dismissive—greeting Ury with "Bad day, man" and hanging up the phone—Rodman eventually opened up over a poolside conversation. As Ury listened with genuine curiosity rather than judgment, Rodman shared revealing details about his interactions with Kim. "Kim took me home one time, and I held his baby," Rodman said with emotion. He explained how Kim had told him, "You're the only person who has ever kept his promise to me. You're a friend for life." Most significantly, Rodman revealed Kim's dream: "His dream is to walk down Fifth Avenue, go to Madison Square Garden, and watch the Bulls play the Knicks, sitting on the floor with me." This humanizing glimpse into Kim's aspirations provided Ury valuable psychological context that formal diplomatic channels had missed. True listening requires suspending our assumptions and preconceptions. When Ury met with a young Syrian rebel commander during the civil war, he initially saw only a bearded jihadist. But by asking open questions with genuine curiosity—"What was your occupation before the war?"—he discovered a poetry student from a family of poets who had won a national contest. The commander shared how torture at age sixteen and witnessing friends being killed had driven him to take up arms. By the conversation's end, the commander asked Ury to tell people in the West: "When they watch the news about Syria, they see us as numbers. Just ask them to imagine that your child, your wife, is one of those numbers. Every single one of us has a life and a soul." To practice this form of transformative listening, begin by creating proper conditions. Eliminate distractions, maintain eye contact, and adopt an open posture. Ask questions that invite deeper sharing: "What matters most to you about this?" or "Help me understand how you see this situation." Notice when your mind starts formulating arguments or judgments, and gently return to listening. Acknowledge what you're hearing through brief reflections like "It sounds like this has been really frustrating for you" without immediately steering the conversation back to your perspective. Remember that empathetic listening doesn't mean you must agree with everything you hear. Rather, it demonstrates that you value the person enough to truly understand their perspective before responding. This act of sincere attention often creates the psychological safety necessary for others to listen to you in return, establishing the foundation for genuine dialogue even amid deep disagreement.

Chapter 3: Identify Core Needs

Beneath the surface positions people take in conflicts lie deeper needs and interests that drive their behavior. Identifying these core needs transforms seemingly intractable situations by revealing possibilities that address what truly matters to everyone involved. Like an iceberg, what we initially see in conflicts—demands, accusations, rigid stances—represents only a small portion of what's actually motivating people. In 2011, a bitter business dispute erupted between Abilio Diniz, a prominent Brazilian entrepreneur, and his French business partner Jean-Charles Naouri over control of Brazil's leading supermarket chain, Pão de Açúcar. The conflict had become so toxic that it was described in the Financial Times as "perhaps the biggest cross-continental boardroom showdown in recent history." When mediator William Ury visited Diniz at his home, he found a man consumed by rage, frustration, and helplessness despite his wealth and status. Rather than diving into the details of competing business claims, Ury asked Diniz a simple but powerful question: "What do you really want from this negotiation?" Initially, Diniz recited his list of demands: convertible stock, elimination of non-compete clauses, company headquarters. Ury persisted: "But what do you really want?" After reflection, Diniz sighed deeply and said, "Liberdade. Freedom. I want my freedom." The emotional resonance in his voice revealed this was no ordinary answer—it touched something profound. When Ury asked what freedom meant to him, Diniz explained: "Time with my family, which is the most important thing in my life. And the freedom to make the business deals I love to make." This breakthrough revelation shifted the entire framework of the negotiation. Instead of battling over rigid positions, Ury could now focus on creating pathways for Diniz to reclaim his sense of freedom and autonomy, regardless of specific legal outcomes. To uncover core needs in your own conflicts, employ the "five whys" technique. When someone states their position, ask "Why is that important to you?" Then ask the same question about their answer, continuing several layers deep. For instance, when a sales director at a software firm complained about customers demanding free customizations, Ury asked why he wanted to say no. "To maintain revenues," the director replied. Ury continued asking why: Why maintain revenues? "To make a profit." Why make a profit? "So our company can survive." Why should the company survive? "So we can all have jobs." Why do you want a job? "So I can put food on my family's table!" With each question, the motivation became more fundamental and emotionally resonant. When exploring core needs, listen for emotional shifts in tone, body language changes, or phrases that seem to carry special significance. Basic human needs that often underlie conflicts include security, autonomy, belonging, dignity, and meaning. Unlike positions, which are often mutually exclusive, these fundamental needs can usually be satisfied simultaneously through creative solutions. Remember that identifying core needs doesn't mean abandoning legitimate concerns or compromising values. Instead, it expands the conversation beyond fixed positions to explore what truly matters, creating space for solutions that address everyone's fundamental interests. By focusing on these deeper motivations, even the most entrenched conflicts can transform into opportunities for mutual gain.

Chapter 4: Create Win-Win Options

Creating win-win options requires shifting from an either-or mindset to a both-and approach—moving beyond rigid positions to explore solutions that satisfy everyone's core interests. This creative process demands that we escape the false dichotomy of "my way or your way" to discover "our way forward." It's about expanding possibilities rather than fighting over limited alternatives. In 2012, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos faced what seemed an impossible challenge: persuading FARC guerrillas who had been fighting for fifty years to lay down their weapons. The civil war had claimed 450,000 lives and produced 8 million victims. To develop a negotiating strategy, Santos assembled international advisors including Jonathan Powell (who had negotiated Northern Ireland's peace), Shlomo Ben-Ami (former Israeli foreign minister), and Joaquín Villalobos (a former guerrilla commander himself). The team gathered at a villa deep in the tropical forest outside Bogotá to generate creative options. William Ury facilitated a breakthrough exercise, asking the group to imagine what would make a successful outcome possible for both sides. He invited Enrique Santos, the president's brother who had connections to the guerrillas, to role-play as the FARC leader Timochenko: "Imagine that the FARC have accepted the government proposal... What could he possibly say to explain this decision to his fighters?" Enrique stepped forward and delivered an impromptu speech as Timochenko: "Compañeros! We have fought bravely now for almost fifty years for the sacred cause of social justice. Many have fallen, and we remember them in our hearts. Now we have a chance to continue our struggle for the rights of the people in a different way—through a struggle at the negotiating table and at the ballot box..." The exercise helped the team see the conflict through the guerrillas' eyes and identify what would make an agreement acceptable to them. Building on this insight, the group identified five agenda items that would address both sides' core interests: agrarian reform (addressing the original cause of the conflict), political participation (giving the guerrillas a peaceful path to power), personal security guarantees (addressing fears of assassination if they disarmed), drug trafficking solutions, and finally—only after progress on the other items—laying down weapons. This creative formula became the framework for what eventually became a historic peace agreement ending the fifty-year war. To generate win-win options in your own conflicts, start by separating the invention process from evaluation. First, brainstorm as many possibilities as possible without immediately judging their feasibility. Use prompts like "What if we..." or "How might we..." to stimulate creative thinking. Engage in collaborative ideation by building on others' suggestions rather than critiquing them—use phrases like "Yes, and..." instead of "Yes, but..." Look for opportunities to expand resources, satisfy different interests with different means, or find completely new approaches that transcend initial positions. Sometimes the breakthrough comes from changing the timing (phasing implementation), scope (addressing additional issues), or process (bringing in new stakeholders). Remember that creativity flourishes in relaxed environments—consider taking walks, changing locations, or using visual tools like drawing to stimulate new thinking. The power of this approach lies in its ability to transform seemingly zero-sum conflicts into positive-sum opportunities. When we move beyond the assumption that one side must lose for the other to win, we unlock our innate human creativity to craft solutions that work for everyone. As Mary Parker Follett wrote nearly a century ago: "We should never allow ourselves to be bullied by an either-or. There is often the possibility of something better than either of these two alternatives."

Chapter 5: Build Golden Bridges

Building a golden bridge means making it easy for others to move from their position to a mutually beneficial agreement. Rather than pushing them to accept your solution—which naturally creates resistance—you construct an attractive pathway forward that allows them to preserve their dignity and meet their core needs. This principle recognizes that the most challenging part of negotiation isn't always the substantive issues but helping people navigate the psychological journey from no to yes. In September 1978, President Jimmy Carter faced an apparently hopeless impasse at the Camp David peace talks between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. After thirteen days of negotiations, they were deadlocked over Israeli settlements in the Sinai Peninsula. Begin declared: "My right eye will fall out, my right hand will fall off, before I ever agree to the dismantling of a single Jewish settlement." Sadat responded immovably: "Never! If you do not agree to evacuate the settlements, there will be no peace." Both leaders told their teams to pack their bags. Instead of pressuring either leader to concede—which would have entrenched their resistance—Carter employed the "one-text" procedure. Rather than haggling over positions, he and his advisors crafted a proposal that addressed both sides' deepest concerns: security for Israel and sovereignty for Egypt. The draft proposed demilitarizing the Sinai, allowing Egyptian sovereignty while preventing military threats to Israel. When presenting the draft, Carter didn't ask for immediate acceptance or rejection. Instead, he invited criticism: "We are not asking you for a decision. Actually, we don't want a decision at this point. We just want you to let us know what you think of it." Through twenty-three drafts over a week, Carter incorporated suggestions and addressed concerns from both sides. When a final crisis emerged over Jerusalem, Carter recognized that Begin was reacting to perceived humiliation. He took a personal approach, bringing Begin photos of the three leaders that Begin had requested for his grandchildren. Carter had written each grandchild's name—"To Ayelet," "To Osnat"—causing Begin's lip to tremble with emotion. Carter said softly, "I wanted to be able to say, 'This is when your grandfather and I brought peace to the Middle East.'" This human connection helped Bridge build the psychological bridge Begin needed to move forward, ultimately resulting in the historic Camp David Accords. To build golden bridges in your own negotiations, start by understanding the obstacles preventing agreement. These typically include unmet needs, fear of losing face, perceived threats to identity, and concerns about implementation. Then create options that address these barriers: reassure others that their core interests will be satisfied, allow them to maintain dignity, and make the process of saying yes as simple as possible. Involve the other side in crafting the solution so they feel ownership rather than coercion. Use phrases like "Based on what you've told me is important to you..." or "I'm wondering if an approach like this might work..." rather than presenting finished proposals they must accept or reject. Break complex agreements into smaller steps to make progress more achievable, and consider whether symbolic gestures—like Carter's personalized photos—might address emotional needs that logical arguments cannot. The essence of building golden bridges lies in making others the hero of their own journey. By focusing on helping them solve their problem rather than imposing your solution, you transform what might have been a battle of wills into a collaborative effort. Remember that people resist being pushed but will often move willingly when they see a path that preserves their dignity and meets their essential needs.

Summary

The path to deeper understanding and more productive conflict resolution lies not in our natural tendencies to react, argue, and push, but in the intentional practices we've explored throughout these chapters. By pausing before reacting, truly listening to understand, identifying core needs beneath positions, creating win-win options, and building golden bridges, we transform how we engage with our differences. These skills work together synergistically—each one enhancing the effectiveness of the others. The most powerful insight from this exploration may be what William Ury discovered during his decades of conflict work: "What is made by us can be changed by us." Our conflicts are not inevitable forces of nature like earthquakes or tsunamis that we must passively endure. They are human creations that we can actively transform through conscious choice and practiced skill. As you move forward, remember that even small changes in how you approach difficult conversations can create ripple effects of positive transformation in your relationships, your community, and potentially our world. Start today by choosing just one principle—perhaps the pause, or deeper listening—and apply it deliberately in your next challenging interaction. The bridge to understanding begins with a single step.

About Author

Loading...

William Ury

William Ury is an American author, academic, anthropologist, and negotiation expert. He co-founded the Harvard Program on Negotiation. Additionally, he helped found the International Negotiation Network with former President Jimmy Carter. Ury is the co-author of Getting to Yes with Roger Fisher, which set out the method of principled negotiation and established the idea of the best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) within negotiation theory.

Read more

Related Books by William Ury

Loading...

Getting to Yes

William Ury

Negotiating an Agreement Without Giving In

★★★★☆4.3

Loading...

The Power of a Positive No

William Ury

How to Say No and Still Get to Yes

★★★★☆4.0