Liars, Leakers, and Liberals

Liars, Leakers, and Liberals Plot Summary

Introduction

Politics in America has long been characterized by partisan divides, but rarely has there been such a coordinated effort to undermine a duly elected president as witnessed during the Trump administration. This unprecedented resistance came not just from political opponents but from what many have termed the "Deep State" – an entrenched bureaucracy with its own agenda, willing to subvert democratic processes. The election of Donald Trump represented a direct challenge to the established political order. His outsider status and promise to "drain the swamp" threatened powerful interests across Washington's political landscape. What followed was a sophisticated campaign to delegitimize and ultimately remove him from office, involving intelligence agencies, career bureaucrats, mainstream media outlets, and Hollywood celebrities. This conspiracy employed tactics ranging from strategic leaks and manufactured scandals to weaponized investigations, all designed to overturn the will of millions of American voters who sought change in 2016.

Chapter 1: The Anti-Trump Conspiracy: Origins and Operatives

The effort to undermine President Trump began even before he took office. Key figures in the intelligence community, particularly at the FBI, set the stage for what would become a years-long campaign to delegitimize his presidency. James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page emerged as central players in this drama, exchanging text messages that revealed their determination to prevent Trump's election and later to sabotage his administration. The conspiracy deepened with the infamous Steele dossier, a collection of unverified and salacious claims about Trump funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. This document, despite its questionable provenance and credibility, became the basis for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. The FBI, in its applications to the FISA court, failed to disclose the political origins of the dossier, effectively misleading judges about the reliability of their evidence. Barack Obama's administration played a significant role in setting the stage for these events. In his final days in office, Obama expanded the sharing of raw NSA intelligence across government agencies, making it easier to "unmask" American citizens caught in surveillance. Susan Rice, Obama's National Security Advisor, sent herself a peculiar email on Inauguration Day documenting a meeting about withholding information from the incoming administration. These actions suggest a coordinated effort to handcuff the Trump presidency before it began. John Brennan at the CIA and James Clapper as Director of National Intelligence pushed the Russian collusion narrative despite lacking substantive evidence. Their public statements and selective leaks to friendly media outlets created an atmosphere of suspicion around the president. When actual investigations failed to produce evidence of collusion, the focus shifted to allegations of obstruction of justice – effectively criminalizing the president's constitutional authority to manage the executive branch. The conspiracy reached its apex with the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, whose investigation targeted anyone associated with Trump. While finding no evidence of Russian collusion, the Mueller probe dragged on for nearly two years, hobbling the administration and providing constant fodder for negative media coverage. This was precisely the "insurance policy" Strzok had texted about – a means to cripple the Trump presidency should the unthinkable happen and he actually win the election.

Chapter 2: Liberal Media and the Propaganda Machine

The mainstream media abandoned any pretense of objectivity during the Trump era, transforming from news outlets into propaganda platforms. Before his political career, Donald Trump had enjoyed a generally positive relationship with the press. The New York Times, Washington Post, and television networks had routinely covered his business ventures and celebrity status favorably. This changed dramatically once he announced his candidacy. Media coverage of the Trump presidency was overwhelmingly negative – studies show that up to 90% of network news coverage portrayed him unfavorably, compared to just 20% negative coverage for Barack Obama. This wasn't simply aggressive reporting; it represented a fundamental shift in how journalists approached their craft. Anonymous sources became the norm, standards of verification deteriorated, and corrections for false stories were buried or never issued at all. The Russian collusion narrative dominated headlines for years despite the lack of supporting evidence. When the Mueller investigation finally concluded without charging any Americans with conspiracy, there was no media reckoning or acknowledgment of overreach. Instead, the focus simply shifted to new allegations. The pattern was consistent: report unverified claims as fact, amplify them across multiple platforms, then move on to new accusations when the original stories collapsed under scrutiny. CNN, MSNBC, and other networks saw their ratings soar during this period, creating a perverse financial incentive to maintain the anti-Trump hysteria. Former CNN president Jeff Zucker, who had previously launched Trump's television career with "The Apprentice," now oversaw wall-to-wall negative coverage. The New York Times and Washington Post similarly enjoyed subscription booms fueled by opposition to Trump. This "Trump bump" created a business model that rewarded increasingly hysterical coverage. Media figures also abandoned traditional boundaries between reporting and activism. Journalists openly expressed their disdain for Trump on social media, attended resistance marches, and framed their work as part of a moral crusade rather than objective reporting. When Trump labeled them "fake news," they responded with indignation while continuing practices that validated his criticism. Perhaps most tellingly, the media's treatment of identical actions varied dramatically based on which administration undertook them. Immigration policies, foreign policy decisions, and executive orders that generated minimal coverage under previous administrations suddenly became constitutional crises under Trump. This selective outrage revealed that the issue wasn't the policies themselves but who was implementing them.

Chapter 3: Political Weaponization of Intelligence Agencies

The transformation of America's intelligence and law enforcement agencies into political weapons represents one of the most disturbing aspects of the anti-Trump conspiracy. Traditionally, these institutions maintained a careful separation from partisan politics. Under Obama's administration, however, the leadership of these agencies increasingly aligned with progressive political goals, setting the stage for unprecedented abuses of power. The FBI's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation demonstrates this politicization. When Clinton mishandled classified information on a private server, FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement exonerating her months before key witnesses were interviewed. The original language describing her actions as "grossly negligent" – the precise terminology in the relevant criminal statute – was changed to "extremely careless" to avoid triggering legal consequences. Meanwhile, FBI agent Peter Strzok texted his colleague Lisa Page that they would "stop" Trump from becoming president, revealing a clear political agenda. The surveillance of American citizens also expanded dramatically during this period. Using the dubious Steele dossier, the FBI obtained FISA warrants to monitor Carter Page, giving them access to communications across the Trump campaign. These warrant applications omitted crucial information that would have undermined their basis, including the dossier's political funding and the FBI's own assessment that portions were unverified. The FISA court, designed as a check on government surveillance powers, instead functioned as a rubber stamp, approving virtually all requests. The "unmasking" of American citizens caught in surveillance represents another abuse. When foreign targets are monitored, Americans who communicate with them are typically anonymized in intelligence reports. However, Obama officials requested unprecedented numbers of unmaskings in 2016-2017, particularly of Trump associates. Samantha Power, Obama's UN Ambassador, requested over 260 unmaskings in her final year – an extraordinary number for someone in her position – yet later claimed she didn't make most of those requests herself, suggesting someone was using her authority. The CIA under John Brennan similarly abandoned its traditional role. Brennan pushed the Russia collusion narrative despite limited evidence, briefed congressional leaders to create political pressure, and later leveraged his former position to become a media commentator attacking Trump. The intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference was produced by a small, handpicked group rather than following standard procedures that would have incorporated broader expertise and potentially dissenting views. These abuses extended beyond the campaign into Trump's presidency. After James Comey was fired, he leaked memos of his conversations with the president specifically to trigger the appointment of a special counsel. This manipulation succeeded, resulting in Robert Mueller's investigation. The resulting probe operated with few constraints, targeting Trump associates for process crimes and unrelated financial matters while failing to uncover evidence of the conspiracy theory that prompted its creation.

Chapter 4: The Mueller Investigation: Anatomy of a Witch Hunt

The appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel in May 2017 was heralded by Trump's opponents as the beginning of the end for his presidency. In reality, it represented the culmination of efforts by the intelligence community and Obama-era Justice Department officials to hamstring the administration through a seemingly legitimate investigative process. From its inception, the investigation was compromised by conflicts of interest and a predetermined narrative. Mueller assembled a team dominated by Democratic donors and former prosecutors known for aggressive tactics. Andrew Weissmann, who had previously been rebuked by the Supreme Court for prosecutorial overreach, became a key figure. Of the 16 lawyers eventually hired, 13 were registered Democrats, with several having made contributions to Hillary Clinton's campaign. This partisan composition undermined the investigation's credibility and suggested an outcome-oriented approach rather than an objective fact-finding mission. The investigation's tactics revealed its true nature. Rather than focusing narrowly on Russian interference in the election, Mueller's team cast a wide net, investigating Trump's business dealings, his family, and associates for matters entirely unrelated to Russia. They used dawn raids with CNN cameras conveniently present, pressured witnesses with financial ruin through legal fees, and threatened family members to extract plea deals. General Michael Flynn, who had served his country honorably for decades, was bankrupted and ultimately pleaded guilty to making false statements despite FBI agents initially believing he had not been deceptive. Throughout its 22-month duration, the investigation was marked by strategic leaks designed to damage the president politically. While Mueller himself remained silent, information damaging to Trump regularly appeared in the press, often misrepresenting the actual evidence. These leaks created a public perception of guilt that the final report could not substantiate. Meanwhile, exculpatory information remained sealed, creating an information asymmetry that served the interests of Trump's opponents. The conclusion of the investigation exposed its fundamental dishonesty. After exhaustive investigation involving 500 search warrants, 2,800 subpoenas, and interviews with 500 witnesses, Mueller's team found no evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Rather than clearly stating this conclusion, however, the report employed tortured language and declined to make traditional prosecutorial judgments about obstruction charges, leaving a cloud of suspicion despite the absence of charges. Perhaps most revealing was Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's statement when announcing indictments against Russian entities: "There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election." This admission, buried in a Friday news conference, confirmed what the president had maintained all along – there was no collusion.

Chapter 5: Constitutional Crisis: Undermining Democratic Elections

The effort to overturn the results of the 2016 election represents an unprecedented assault on America's constitutional order. The peaceful transfer of power following elections has been a hallmark of American democracy since its founding. Yet powerful interests within government, media, and political establishments worked tirelessly to nullify the legitimate outcome of a presidential election simply because they disagreed with the voters' choice. This constitutional subversion operated through multiple channels. The first approach involved delegitimizing the election itself through claims of Russian interference. While Russia did attempt to influence the election through social media campaigns and hacking operations, the scale and impact of these efforts were grossly exaggerated. Studies showed that Russian-linked Facebook ads represented less than 0.1 percent of content on the platform, yet media coverage suggested a massive operation that somehow determined the election outcome. This narrative directly undermined the legitimacy of Trump's presidency while conveniently excusing Hillary Clinton's failed campaign. When Russian collusion allegations failed to produce impeachable offenses, Trump's opponents pivoted to claims of obstruction of justice. This new approach criminalized the president's exercise of his constitutional authority – specifically, his right to fire FBI Director James Comey. The theory required a tortured legal interpretation that effectively claimed a president could obstruct justice by taking actions explicitly authorized by the Constitution. This represented a direct attack on the separation of powers established by the framers. Perhaps most concerning was the behavior of unelected bureaucrats who openly worked to thwart the president's agenda. Anonymous officials boasted to the New York Times about being part of a "resistance" within the administration. Career diplomats and intelligence officials leaked classified information, undermined foreign policy initiatives, and slow-walked directives they personally opposed. This "administrative state" effectively claimed authority superior to the democratically elected president, inverting the constitutional order where power flows from the people through their elected representatives. The impeachment process similarly weaponized constitutional provisions for partisan purposes. Rather than identifying clear "high crimes and misdemeanors," Democrats pursued impeachment based on policy disagreements and manufactured controversies. The standard for this most serious constitutional remedy was lowered to serve immediate political goals, establishing dangerous precedents for future administrations of either party. Throughout this process, the judiciary was similarly politicized. District judges issued nationwide injunctions against presidential actions based on dubious legal reasoning, effectively giving individual judges veto power over the executive branch. These injunctions were frequently overturned by higher courts, but they succeeded in delaying implementation of key policies for months or years. This judicial activism represented another mechanism through which unelected officials could override the democratic process.

Chapter 6: Trump's Resilience and Policy Achievements

Despite the unprecedented resistance faced by his administration, President Trump managed to implement significant portions of his agenda and deliver tangible results for the American people. While the media fixated on manufactured scandals and investigations, the administration quietly achieved policy successes that benefited citizens across the economic spectrum. The Trump administration's economic policies produced remarkable results. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%, bringing the United States in line with global competitors and spurring business investment. Individual tax rates were also lowered across all income brackets, with the standard deduction doubled to benefit middle-class families. These changes, combined with aggressive deregulation efforts, created an economic boom. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment reached historic lows, including record-low unemployment for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans. Wage growth accelerated, particularly for lower-income workers, reversing decades of stagnation. Foreign policy achievements were equally impressive, though rarely acknowledged by mainstream media. The administration eliminated the ISIS territorial caliphate, a stark contrast to its expansion under previous policies. Trump's willingness to enforce red lines in Syria through targeted strikes restored American credibility without dragging the country into another Middle Eastern quagmire. Perhaps most significantly, the Abraham Accords represented the first major peace agreements between Israel and Arab nations in decades, creating a framework for regional stability that conventional wisdom had deemed impossible. Trade policy underwent a fundamental realignment under Trump's leadership. Decades of one-sided agreements that disadvantaged American workers were renegotiated or abandoned. NAFTA was replaced with the USMCA, incorporating stronger labor and environmental protections while addressing digital commerce issues. The administration took a firm stance against China's unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and forced technology transfers. While critics predicted economic disaster from these confrontations, the American economy continued to strengthen, and trading partners made significant concessions. Immigration enforcement, a cornerstone of Trump's campaign, saw meaningful progress despite congressional obstruction of border wall funding. The administration implemented Migrant Protection Protocols requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico during processing, reducing fraudulent claims and ending "catch and release" policies. Agreements with Central American countries addressed root causes of migration. These policies substantially reduced illegal border crossings before pandemic-related disruptions. Judicial appointments represent one of Trump's most enduring legacies. Working closely with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the administration appointed three Supreme Court justices and over 230 federal judges. These appointees, committed to constitutional originalism rather than judicial activism, will shape American jurisprudence for decades. The confirmation of these judges occurred despite unprecedented obstruction tactics, including character assassination attempts against nominees like Brett Kavanaugh. Trump's resilience in the face of relentless attacks demonstrated an essential quality often overlooked by his critics: genuine commitment to the promises he made to voters. Unlike typical politicians who campaign on bold agenda items only to abandon them once in office, Trump persistently pursued the policies he had advocated during his campaign, even when politically costly or opposed by members of his own party.

Chapter 7: Restoring America: The Trump Presidency's Impact

The Trump administration's accomplishments extend beyond specific policy initiatives to encompass a broader restoration of American confidence, independence, and prosperity. After years of managed decline and apologetic foreign policy, Trump reasserted American exceptionalism and pursued national interests without hesitation or equivocation. This fundamental shift in perspective produced tangible benefits both domestically and internationally. Energy independence, long considered impossible, became reality under Trump's leadership. By removing regulatory barriers to production and approving critical infrastructure like the Keystone XL pipeline, America became a net energy exporter for the first time in decades. This transformation strengthened national security by reducing dependence on Middle Eastern oil, created hundreds of thousands of high-paying jobs, and lowered energy costs for American families and businesses. The geopolitical implications were equally significant, reducing Russia's energy leverage over European allies and creating new export markets for American producers. The administration's commitment to American workers reversed decades of globalist policies that had hollowed out manufacturing communities. Prior to COVID-19, manufacturing employment grew at its fastest rate in decades. Companies repatriated overseas operations in response to tax incentives and regulatory reforms. The focus on trade enforcement and reciprocal agreements demonstrated that global commerce could benefit American workers rather than simply enriching multinational corporations and foreign competitors. This approach represented a decisive break from both parties' previous embrace of unrestricted globalization. In healthcare, Trump pursued reforms focused on increasing transparency and consumer choice rather than government control. Executive orders requiring hospitals to publish prices for common procedures introduced market forces into a system long insulated from competition. The elimination of the individual mandate penalty restored freedom of choice while association health plans expanded options for small businesses and their employees. These incremental improvements avoided the disruption of more radical proposals while addressing specific pain points in the healthcare system. The administration's approach to education emphasized local control and parental choice over federal mandates. Support for charter schools, vocational training, and school choice initiatives provided alternatives to failing public schools, particularly in underserved communities. The restoration of due process protections on college campuses corrected overreach from previous administrations that had undermined fundamental fairness. These reforms recognized that educational decisions are best made by families and communities rather than distant bureaucrats. Perhaps most significantly, the Trump administration reasserted American sovereignty in international affairs. Rather than subordinating national interests to multilateral institutions and global governance structures, Trump evaluated each engagement based on its benefits for American citizens. The withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord and Iran nuclear deal demonstrated willingness to reject arrangements that imposed disproportionate burdens on the United States while providing minimal benefits. Similarly, demands that NATO allies meet their defense spending commitments strengthened the alliance by ensuring more equitable burden-sharing. This restoration of American independence extended to challenging the unaccountable administrative state domestically. Trump's executive order requiring the elimination of two existing regulations for each new one introduced imposed accountability on bureaucratic agencies accustomed to expanding their authority without constraint. Similarly, the relocation of federal agencies from Washington to affected communities reconnected government with the citizens it serves while reducing the concentration of power in the capital.

Summary

The concerted effort to undermine President Trump reveals the existence of entrenched power structures willing to subvert democratic processes when their interests are threatened. The weaponization of intelligence agencies, mainstream media, and the judicial system against a democratically elected president represents a fundamental challenge to constitutional governance. When unelected bureaucrats can effectively nullify election results through selective leaks, politically motivated investigations, and administrative resistance, the foundational principle that government derives its power from the consent of the governed is placed at risk. Despite these unprecedented challenges, the Trump administration achieved significant policy successes that benefited ordinary Americans. Economic revitalization, energy independence, judicial appointments, peace agreements, and trade reforms demonstrated that meaningful change remains possible even in the face of determined opposition from established powers. This resilience offers hope that dedicated reformers can overcome institutional resistance when supported by citizens demanding accountability from their government. The struggle between democratic self-governance and rule by unelected elites continues, with the outcome determining whether America will remain a constitutional republic or transform into something its founders would not recognize.

About Author

Loading...

Judge Jeanine Pirro

Read more